Pride and Shame: Examining the Reciprocal Casual Relationship Between the 2 × 2 Achievement Goals and Academic Outcome Emotions
Author: Shu-Ling Peng (Center of Teacher Education, National Cheng Kung University), Biing-Lin Cherng (Institute of Education, National Cheng Kung University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 71, No. 2
Date:June 2026
Pages:335-370
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0011
Abstract:
Research Motivation
Academic emotions are integral to students’ motivation, engagement, and academic outcomes (Pekrun, 2006). Among these, pride and shame– self-conscious emotions linked to achievement outcomes– are particularly salient yet underexplored. According to Control-Value Theory (CVT) (Pekrun, 2006; Pekrun & Perry, 2014), students’ emotional experiences in learning are shaped by their appraisals of control and value. Achievement goals, as distal motivational beliefs, influence these appraisals and thereby indirectly affect emotions (Pekrun et al., 2002). Importantly, CVT also posits that emotions reciprocally influence motivational beliefs over time, forming dynamic feedback loops (Pekrun et al., 2006). However, empirical evidence testing these bidirectional processes remains scarce– especially among early adolescents and in non-Western educational contexts. To address these gaps, this study examines the longitudinal, reciprocal associations between four achievement goals and two key outcome emotions– pride and shame– among Taiwanese junior high school students.
Literature Review
1. Academic Outcome Emotions: Pride and Shame
Pride and shame play central roles in learning. Pride is a positive, activating emotion that arises when success is attributed to internal, controllable causes and is personally valued. In contrast, shame is a negative, activating emotion triggered by perceived failure and low controllability– even when failure is attributed to a lack of effort (Pekrun et al., 2023). Empirical research links pride to increased motivation, self-regulation, and academic achievement, whereas shame predicts maladaptive outcomes such as avoidance, helplessness, and disengagement (Butz et al., 2016; McGregor & Elliot, 2005).
2. Four-dimensional Achievement Goals
Achievement goals– the reasons students engage in academic tasks– are key motivational constructs. The 2×2 framework of achievement goals (Elliot & McGregor, 2001) classifies goals along two dimensions: the definition of competence (mastery vs. performance) and motivational valence (approach vs. avoidance). This yields four goal types: mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance. A meta-analysis by Huang (2012) demonstrated this framework’s superior predictive power for academic outcomes. Subsequent studies have used it to examine relationships between achievement goals and emotional, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes across cultural and developmental contexts (Demirbag & Bahcivan, 2022; Peng, 2019; Putwain, Larkin et al., 2013; Putwain, Sander et al., 2013).
3. Linking Achievement Goals with Emotions
Within CVT, achievement goals shape students’ emotional experiences by guiding control-value appraisals. Performance goals, emphasizing normative evaluation, often evoke pride or shame. Mastery goals, typically tied to learning-focused emotions, can also trigger pride or shame depending on students’ internal standards and outcome interpretations (Putwain, Larkin et al., 2013). Prior studies suggest that performance-approach goals are positively linked to pride, while avoidance goals– both mastery-avoidance and performance-avoidance– are associated with shame, especially under low perceived control (Goetz et al., 2016; Pekrun et al., 2009). Yet few studies have tested whether these emotions reciprocally influence future motivational orientations.
4. The Present Study
Building on this foundation, the present study examined the reciprocal, longitudinal relations between four achievement goals and the outcome emotions of pride and shame among Taiwanese seventh-grade students. Mathematics was chosen as the target domain due to its emotional salience and academic importance in East Asian contexts (Gladstone et al., 2018; OECD, 2016). Gender and prior academic achievement were included as control variables due to their known associations with goal endorsement and emotional responses (Pekrun et al., 2009; Watt, 2006).
Method
This study adopted a three-wave longitudinal design to examine the reciprocal relations between achievement goals and academic emotions among Taiwanese junior high school students. A regionally stratified convenience sampling approach was used to recruit 835 Grade 7 students from 17 schools across northern, central, and southern Taiwan. After removing inattentive or incomplete responses, a final sample of 792 students (354 boys, 438 girls) completed all three waves of data collection over one academic year, with approximately six-month intervals.
Two cross-lagged panel models (CLPMs) were estimated using structural equation modeling (SEM) with LISREL 8.50 and maximum likelihood estimation. Each model included four types of achievement goals (mastery-approach, mastery-avoidance, performance-approach, performance- avoidance) and two academic emotions (pride and shame). Gender and prior math achievement– indexed by three midterm exam scores from the second semester and standardized within classrooms– served as control variables. All measures were administered in validated, abbreviated formats with demonstrated internal consistency across waves (Cronbach’s α = .79-.92). To account for clustering effects due to nested data, all variables were standardized at the classroom level prior to model estimation.
Results and Discussion
The results revealed evolving reciprocal relations between achievement goals and academic emotions. Mastery-approach goals initially predicted increases in pride, but this relation became reciprocal over time, indicating that pride not only stems from adaptive goal pursuit but also reinforces subsequent mastery-approach motivation. In contrast, mastery-avoidance and performance-avoidance goals showed stable mutual reinforcement with shame– students who adopted avoidance goals felt greater shame, which in turn intensified avoidance motivation. This pattern reflects a maladaptive cycle of emotional vulnerability and motivational withdrawal.
Moreover, performance-avoidance goals were found to suppress pride over time; paradoxically, pride later predicted greater endorsement of performance-avoidance goals. This asymmetrical relation suggests that even positive emotions, when experienced under high-stakes evaluative pressure, can feed self-protective motivational tendencies. Additionally, the initially one-way association between performance-avoidance and shame evolved into a reciprocal loop, indicating that emotional distress may gradually shape motivational orientations.
Conclusions
These findings offer robust empirical support for the CVT model, highlighting the dynamic, bidirectional nature of motivation-emotion processes. They underscore the importance of early interventions that reduce avoidance goals and foster adaptive emotional regulation– especially in high-pressure academic contexts like mathematics. Cultivating pride through mastery-oriented goals and equipping students to manage shame in the face of difficulty may help break maladaptive cycles and promote more resilient, engaged learning trajectories.
Keywords:
cross-lagged panel modeling (CLPM), achievement goal, pride, shame, academic emotion
《Full Text》
References:林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報,39(2),173-194。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070423
【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2007). The latent change analysis among individual goal orientation, classroom goal structures and self-regulated learning strategies. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 39(2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070423】
林宴瑛、程炳林(2014)。超越四向度:六向度目標導向模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報,46(1),117-140。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20140120
【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2014). Beyond 4 dimension: The verification and analysis of 6-dimensional goal orientation model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20140120】
教育部(2019)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
【Ministry of Education. (2019). General guidelines of the 12-year basic education curriculum. https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%A
A%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf】
彭淑玲(2019)。知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標、學業自我效能與無聊之關係:中介效果與條件化間接效果分析。教育心理學報,51(1),83-108。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0004
【Peng, S.-L. (2019). Perceived teacher feedbacks, personal achievement goals, and academic self-efficacy on boredom: The mediation effect and conditional indirect effect. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(1), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0004】
彭淑玲、程炳林(2022)。國中生逃避策略使用的改變及其與知覺的課室目標結構、羞愧的改變之關係。教育心理學報,53(3),665-686。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202203_53(3).0007
【Peng, S.-L., & Cherng, B.-L. (2022). Use of avoidance strategies in Taiwanese junior high school students and such strategies’ relationship to classroom goal structure and feeling of shame. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 665-686. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202203_53(3).0007】
» More
一、中文文獻
林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報,39(2),173-194。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070423
【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2007). The latent change analysis among individual goal orientation, classroom goal structures and self-regulated learning strategies. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 39(2), 173-194. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20070423】
林宴瑛、程炳林(2014)。超越四向度:六向度目標導向模式之驗證與分析。教育心理學報,46(1),117-140。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20140120
【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2014). Beyond 4 dimension: The verification and analysis of 6-dimensional goal orientation model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20140120】
教育部(2019)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
【Ministry of Education. (2019). General guidelines of the 12-year basic education curriculum. https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%A
A%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf】
彭淑玲(2019)。知覺教師回饋、個人成就目標、學業自我效能與無聊之關係:中介效果與條件化間接效果分析。教育心理學報,51(1),83-108。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0004
【Peng, S.-L. (2019). Perceived teacher feedbacks, personal achievement goals, and academic self-efficacy on boredom: The mediation effect and conditional indirect effect. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(1), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.201909_51(1).0004】
彭淑玲、程炳林(2022)。國中生逃避策略使用的改變及其與知覺的課室目標結構、羞愧的改變之關係。教育心理學報,53(3),665-686。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202203_53(3).0007
【Peng, S.-L., & Cherng, B.-L. (2022). Use of avoidance strategies in Taiwanese junior high school students and such strategies’ relationship to classroom goal structure and feeling of shame. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 665-686. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202203_53(3).0007】
彭淑玲、黃博聖、陳學志(2019)。學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係:以學業自我效能為調節變項。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),87-113。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0004
【Peng, S.-L., Huang, P.-S., & Chen, H.-C. (2019). Personal achievement goals and the acceptability of cheating in an academic context: The moderating role of academic self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0004】
程炳林(2003)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報,48(1),15-40。https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200304.0002
【Cherng, B.-L. (2003). Study of the model of 4 dimensions goal orientations. Journal of Taiwan Normal University Education, 48(1), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200304.0002】
程炳林(2012)。國中生課業情緒的測量、發展與領域特定性(I)(NSC101-2410-H006-09)。科技部。https://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/:127013
【Cherng, B.-L. (2012). The measurement, development, and domain specificity of junior high school students’ academic emotions (I) (NSC101-2410-H006-095). Ministry of Science and Technology. https://ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/:127013】
二、外文文獻
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6, Pt.1), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Boehme, K. L., Goetz, T., & Preckel, F. (2017). Is it good to value math? Investigating mother’s impact on their children’s test anxiety based on control-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.05.002
Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Jensen, J. L., & Harsell, D. M. (2016). The impact of emotions on student achievement in synchronous hybrid business and public administration programs: A longitudinal test of control-value theory. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(4), 441-474. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12110
Camacho-Morles, J., Slemp, G. R., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., Hou, H., & Oades, L. G. (2021). Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 1051-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09585-3
Chao, T.-Y., Sung, Y. T., & Tseng, F. L. (2024). High-stakes test anxiety among Taiwanese adolescents: A longitudinal study. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2321019
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge University Press.
Demirbag, M., & Bahvivan, E. (2022). Psychological modeling of preservice science teachers’ argumentativeness, achievement goals, and epistemological beliefs: A mixed design. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37, 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00558-w
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143-179). JAI Press.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Elliot, A. J., & Pekrun, R. (2007). Emotion in the hierarchical model of approach-avoidance achievement motivation. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 57-74). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50005-8
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632-648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Gladstone, J. R., Hafner, I., Turci, L., Kneiβler, H., & Muenks, K. (2018). Associations between parents and students’ motivational beliefs in mathematics and mathematical performance: The role of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.009
Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. (2016). Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach. Learning and Instruction, 41, 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.10.007
Heckel, C., & Ringeisen, T. (2019). Pride and anxiety in online learning environments: Achievement emotions as mediators between learners’ characteristics and learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12367
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106(4), 766-794. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
Huang, C. (2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 48-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026223
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_2
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Marsh, H. W., Martin, A. J., & Jackson, S. (2010). Introducing a short version of the physical self description questionnaire: New strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(4), 438-482. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.4.438
McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 577-605. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2005). The shame of failure: Examining the link between fear of failure and shame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 218-231. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167204271420
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825
Meuleman, B., & Billiet, J. (2009). A Monte Carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM? Survey Research Methods, 3(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2009.v3i1.666
Oades-Sese, G. V., Matthews, T., & Lewis, M. (2014). Shame and pride and their effects on student achievement. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 246-264). Taylor and Francis.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Education at a glance 2016: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2016-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). PISA 2018 results (Volume VI): Are students ready to thrive in an interconnected world? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d5f68679-en
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013383
Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120-141). Taylor & Francis.
Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2012). Academic emotions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 3-31). American Psychological Association.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H. W., & Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653-1670. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12704
Pekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., Elliot, A. J., Stockinger, K., Perry, R. P., Vogl, E., Goetz, T., & van Tiburg, W. A. P. (2023). A three-dimensional taxonomy of achievement emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 145-178. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000448
Peng, S. L., Cherng, B. L., & Chang, L. Y. (2024). Is academic anxiety good or bad for students? Investigating the moderating effects of anxiety on the reciprocal relations between self-efficacy and achievement in mathematics. Motivation and Emotion, 48, 484-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-024-10072-3
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press.
Putwain, D. W., Larkin, D., & Sander, P. (2013). A reciprocal model of achievement goals and learning related emotions in the first year of undergraduate study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.003
Putwain, D. W., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Using the 2 × 2 framework of achievement goals to predict achievement emotions and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.006
Robinson, K. A., Lee, Y.-K., Bovee, E. A., Perez, T., Walton, S. P., Briedis, D., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2019). Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 1081-1102. https://doi. org/10.1037/edu0000331
Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., & Tebb, S. S. (2001). Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(4), 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0804_06
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Recent advances in the empirical study of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist, 38, 1132-1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764295038008008
Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The nature of pride. In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research (pp. 263-282). Guilford.
Turner, J. C., Husman, J., & Schallert, D. L. (2003). The importance of students’ goals in their emotional experience of academic failure: Investigating the precursors and consequences of shame. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3802_3
Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765562
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
Widaman, K. F., Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., & Sawalani, G. (2011). On creating and using short forms of scales in secondary research. In K. J. Collins (Ed.), Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists (pp. 39-61). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12320-003
Zeidner, M. (2014). Anxiety in education. In R. Pekrun & E. A. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 265-288). Taylor & Francis.