Construction of Professional Performance Guidelines for Preschool Educators
Author: Liang-Chen Sun (Department of Early Childhood Education, National Tsing Hua University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 71, No. 2
Date：June 2026
Pages：201-231
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0007
Abstract：
Preschool educators serve as the primary caregivers for young children and play a critical role in shaping their cognitive, emotional, and skill development. Given the significant impact of educators’ professional performance on preschoolers’ growth, it is essential to construct comprehensive professional performance guidelines. These guidelines not only support educators in demonstrating professional competence but also enhance their professional identity and perceived value. This study aims to identify the core components of professional performance among preschool educators, develop a structured set of performance guidelines, and examine the impact of these guidelines on the overall quality of preschool educators’ professional practice.
Based on relevant documents from international sources, preschool education organizations, and the Ministry of Education, the professional performance guidelines for preschool educators were structured around four major domains. First, in the domain of Foundational Educational Philosophies and Contemporary Issues, preschool educators are expected to possess sound educational competence, understand the developmental characteristics of young children, and stay informed about current reforms and issues in early childhood education. Second, within the domain of Implementation of Preschool Educational Activities, educators are responsible for designing developmentally appropriate curricula, employing diverse teaching strategies, creating enriching learning environments, ensuring the health and safety of children, and fostering collaborative relationships with parents and the broader community. Third, the domain of Classroom Management and Child Guidance, emphasizes the creation of a harmonious classroom atmosphere, the cultivation of positive teacher–child relationships and classroom norms, the use of guidance and counseling strategies to address behavioral issues, and the support of children’s social interaction and learning outcomes. Finally, in the domain of Professional Ethics, educators are expected to comply with regulations that protect children’s rights, engage in ongoing professional development, and demonstrate passion and commitment to their roles. These four domains are further divided into 12 sub-domains and comprise a total of 40 performance indicators.
Based on four focus group interviews with 27 experts– including university professors, preschool teachers, kindergarten principals, and principals of elementary school-affiliated kindergartens– the professional performance guidelines for preschool educators were revised to include five major domains: (1) children’s rights and contemporary issues, (2) preschool educational activities, (3) health, safety, and caregiving, (4) classroom management and child guidance, and (5) professional commitment. These domains are further divided into 12 sub-domains and encompass a total of 36 performance indicators.
A total of 23 experts– including 11 early childhood education scholars and 12 preschool practitioners– were invited to review the professional performance standards for preschool educators using the Delphi method. Among the 36 performance indicators, 33 achieved a mode of 6, while the remaining 3 had a mode of 5. The overall mean scores ranged from 5.0 to 5.9, with standard deviations between 0.24 and 0.69. The finalized professional performance standards consist of five domains, 12 sub-domains, and 36 performance indicators.
The finalized professional performance standards were converted into a questionnaire and distributed to 907 respondents, of which 486 valid responses were returned and used for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The results indicated an acceptable model fit: χ²/df = 2.65, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .058, standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) = .048, goodness of fit index (GFI) = .841, comparative fit index (CFI) = .921, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .913, parsimonious goodness of fit index (PGFI) = .723, private nonresidential fixed investment (PNFI) = .798, and critical N (CN) = 202. The standardized factor loadings for the 36 indicators ranged from .65 to .90, all exceeding the .60 threshold. The squared multiple correlation (SMC) values ranged from .50 to .81, all above .50. The composite reliability (CR) for 12 first-order latent variables ranged from .76 to .87, while 5 second-order latent variables had CR values between .86 and .87, all above the .60 threshold. The average variance extracted (AVE) for 12 first-order latent variables ranged from .51 to .70, while 5 second-order latent variables had AVE values between .77 and .93, all above the .50 threshold. This indicated that the observed variables are able to respond to the latent traits of the common constructs and possess excellent convergent validity.
This study yielded several key findings. First, the domain “Children’s Rights and Contemporary Issues” aligns with the principles of child protection outlined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and reflects the Department for Education (DfE, 2023) emphasis on the role of preschool educators in safeguarding children’s welfare and rights. Secondly, preschool educational activities should encompass curriculum and lesson design, teaching implementation, learning environment planning, and assessment. These components align with the guidelines set forth by Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2017), the Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI, 2011), the Council of Europe (2019), the Department for Education (DfE, 2023), the Government of Singapore (2022), and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC, 2020). Moreover, within the domain of “Health, Safety, and Caregiving,” preschool educators should plan activities that prioritize the safety and health of preschoolers. This is consistent with the guidelines set by the Department for Education (DfE, 2023) and the Government of Singapore (2022). In the domain of “Classroom Management and Child Guidance,” preschool educators utilize classroom management strategies to support preschoolers’ learning (Ministry of Education, 2016a, 2016b; ACEI, 2011; Government of Singapore, 2022). Finally, within the domain of “Professional Commitment,” preschool educators demonstrate a willingness to adhere to professional ethical standards and commit to the education and care of preschoolers. This concept of professional commitment is in line with Anitha and Krishnaveni’s (2013) notion of educators’ dedication to their roles, as well as with the commitment emphasized by Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2017), Ministry of Education (2016a, 2016b), the Department for Education (DfE, 2023), the Government of Singapore (2022), and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC, 2020).
Based on the findings of this study, several suggestions were made. First, preschool educators can use the professional performance guidelines to assess their own professional performance and as a reference for enhancing preschool education. Second, teacher education programs can utilize the guidelines to evaluate the comprehensiveness of pre-service training curricula. Third, these guidelines can add value to institutional evaluation processes. Finally, the guidelines can serve as a foundation for developing specialized education and vocational training programs.
Keywords：
professional standards, preschool educators’ professional performance, Delphi method, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)
《Full Text》
References：王文科、王智弘（2009）。教育研究法。五南。
【Wang, W.-K., & Wang, C.-H. (2009). Educational research method. Wu-Nan Book.】
日本文部科學省（2017）。幼稚園教育要領。https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1384661_3_2.pdf
【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. (2017). Early childhood education guidelines. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1384661_3_2.pdf】
行政院兒童及少年福利與權益推動小組（2019）。中華民國（臺灣）兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查會議結論性意見（定稿）。行政院。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Document/5334-%E7%B5%90%E8%AB%96%E6%80%A7%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B-%E4%B8%AD
%E6%96%87%E7%89%881071001.pdf
【Children and Youth Welfare and Rights Promotion Group, Executive Yuan. (2019). Concluding observations on the first report of the ROC/Taiwan on the implementation of the UN convention on the rights of the child. Executive Yuan. https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Document/5334-%E7%B5%90%E8%AB%96%E6%80%A7%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B-%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E7%89%881071001.pdf】
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。高等教育。
【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Higher Education.】
吳明隆（2007）。結構方程模式：AMOS的操作與應用。五南。
【Wu, M.-L. (2007). Structural equation modeling: AMOS operation and application. Wu-Nan Book.】
» More
一、中文文獻
王文科、王智弘（2009）。教育研究法。五南。
【Wang, W.-K., & Wang, C.-H. (2009). Educational research method. Wu-Nan Book.】
日本文部科學省（2017）。幼稚園教育要領。https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1384661_3_2.pdf
【Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. (2017). Early childhood education guidelines. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1384661_3_2.pdf】
行政院兒童及少年福利與權益推動小組（2019）。中華民國（臺灣）兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查會議結論性意見（定稿）。行政院。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Document/5334-%E7%B5%90%E8%AB%96%E6%80%A7%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B-%E4%B8%AD
%E6%96%87%E7%89%881071001.pdf
【Children and Youth Welfare and Rights Promotion Group, Executive Yuan. (2019). Concluding observations on the first report of the ROC/Taiwan on the implementation of the UN convention on the rights of the child. Executive Yuan. https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Document/5334-%E7%B5%90%E8%AB%96%E6%80%A7%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B-%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87%E7%89%881071001.pdf】
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS的應用。高等教育。
【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Higher Education.】
吳明隆（2007）。結構方程模式：AMOS的操作與應用。五南。
【Wu, M.-L. (2007). Structural equation modeling: AMOS operation and application. Wu-Nan Book.】
吳清山（2018）。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），261-293。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009
【Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009】
吳清山、王令宜（2017）。教師專業標準的理論與應用。教育行政，108，98-118。https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002017030108005
【Wu, C.-S., & Wang, L.-Y. (2017). Theory and application of professional standards for teachers. School Administrators, 108, 98-118. https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002017030108005】
林清章（2012）。幼兒園教師專業能力指標之建構。幼兒教保研究期刊，8，53-79。https://doi.org/10.6471/JECEC.201202.0053
【Lin, C.-C. (2012). Establishing the professional competency indicators of kindergarten teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Education & Care, 8, 53-79. https://doi.org/10.6471/JECEC.201202.0053】
孫良誠（2019）。教保服務人員教學專業表現量表編製研究。教育行政與評鑑學刊，25，35-66。
【Sun, L.-C. (2019). The study of developing an evaluation scale of teaching professional performance for preschool educators. Journal of Educational Administration and Evaluation, 25, 35-66.】
高家斌、蔡秋桃、鄭博真、蘇玲慧（2013）。教師教學專業表現及其發展策略之探討—以三位幼兒教師的訪談分析為例。華醫學報，38，59-80。
【Kao, C.-P., Tsai, C.-T., Jeng, B.-J., & Su, L.-H. (2013). An investigation on the professional performance and developmental strategy for teaching– An analysis of the interviews with three preschool teachers. Bulletin of Chung Hwa University of Medical Technology, 38, 59-80.】
堀田諭（2018）。第10章日本。載於猿田祐嗣（主編），諸外国の教員養成における教員の資質・能力スタンダード（頁85-91）。平成29年度プロジェクト研究調查研究報告書。https://nier.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1789
【Horita, Y. (2018). Chapter 10 Japan. In Yūji Saruta (Ed.), Standards for teacher qualifications and abilities in teacher training in various countries (pp. 85-91). Research Report of the Project Study Investigation for the Fiscal Year 2017. https://nier.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/1789】
教育部（2016a）。中華民國教師專業標準指引。
【Ministry of Education. (2016a). Guidelines for teacher professional standards of the Republic of China.】
教育部（2016b）。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。
【Ministry of Education. (2016b). ECEC curriculum framework.】
教育部（2023）。中華民國教師專業素養指引—師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準修正規定。
【Ministry of Education. (2023). Teacher professional competences guidelines: Revised regulation for pre-service teacher education program standards.】
張瓊文、鍾志從（2016）。幼兒對人性的人際知覺與其同儕社會地位的關聯。人類發展與家庭學報，17，27-49。https://doi.org/10.6246/JHDFS.201611_(17).0002
【Chang, C.-W., & Jong, J.-T. (2016). The association of young children’s interpersonal perception in the philosophy of human nature and social status. Journal of Human Development and Family, 17, 27-49. https://doi.org /10.6246/JHDFS.201611_(17).0002】
黃嘉莉、陳學志、王俊斌、洪仁進（2020）。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），1-35。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001
【Huang, J.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wang, C.-P., & Hung, J.-C. (2020). Construction and application of teacher professional standards and curriculum baseline for preservice teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001】
劉馥夢、陳殷哲（2016）。教保服務人員工作壓力與情緒勞務關聯性之研究。學校行政，105，85-110。https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002016090105005
【Lin, F.-M., & Chen, Y.-C. (2016). Correlation between preschool educators’ job stress and emotional labor. School Administrators, 105, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002016090105005】
二、外文文獻
Anitha, J., & Krishnaveni, R. (2013). Professional characteristics of an educator: A survey of literature. Journal of Management and Development Studies, 25(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10. 3126/jmds.v25i1.24934
Association for Childhood Education International. (2011). ACEI global guidelines assessment (GGA) (3rd ed.). https://www.scribd.com/document/954197805/Acei-Global-Guideline-Assess
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2018). Australian professional standards for teachers.
Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2013). The COACTIV model of teachers’ professional competence. Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers, 8, 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_2
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013). Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium InTASC model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0: A resource for ongoing teacher development.
Council of Europe. (2019). Global education guideline: Concepts and methodologies on global education for educators and policy makers. https://rm.coe.int/prems-089719-global-education- guide-a4/1680973101
Demirkasımoğlu, N. (2010). Defining “teacher professionalism” from different perspectives. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2047-2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010. 12.444
Department for Education. (2021). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and soverning bodies. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/38315/1/Teachers__Standards_2021_update.pdf
Department for Education. (2023). Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage: Setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/39980/1/EYFS_framework_from_September_2023.pdf
Diamond, F., & Bulfin, S. (2023). Care of the profession: Teacher professionalism and learning beyond performance and compliance. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(2), 503-521. https://doi. org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2239820
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 249524
Donaldson, G. (2013). The twenty-first century professional. In V. V. Vidović & Z. Velkovski (Eds.), Teaching profession for the 21st century (pp. 13-23). Centre for Education Policy.
Education International, & United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2019). Global framework of professional teaching standards. https://www.ei-ie.org/en/item/25734:global-framework-of-professional-teaching -standards
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3151312
Government of Alberta. (2018). Alberta education teaching quality standard. https://open.alberta.ca/ publications/alberta-education-teaching-quality-standard
Government of Singapore. (2022). Skills framework for early childhood. https://www.skillsfuture. gov.sg/docs/default-source/skills-framework/skills-framework-for-early-childhood.pdf
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.
Jorif, M., & Burleigh, C. (2022). Secondary teachers’ perspectives on sustaining growth mindset concepts in instruction. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 15(1), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-04-2020-0020
Jung, H. Y., & Reifel, S. (2011). Promoting children’s communication: A kindergarten teacher’s conception and practice of effective mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(2), 194-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2011.555496
Kulgemeyer, C., & Riese, J. (2018). From professional knowledge to professional performance: The impact of CK and PCK on teaching quality in explaining situations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1393-1418. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21457
Mockler, N. (2013). Teacher professional learning in a neoliberal age: Audit, professionalism and identity. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(10), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte. 2013v38n10.8
National Association for the Education of Yong Child. (2020). Professional standards and competencies for early childhood educators. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-shared/downloads/PDFs/resources/position-statements/naeyc_standards_and_competencies_ps_final.pdf
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2016). What teachers should know and be able to do. https://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/what_teachers_should_know.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012a). Starting strong III: A quality toolbox for early childhood education and care.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012b). Education at a glance 2012: OECD indicator.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Teacher professionalism. Teaching in Focus, 14, 1-4. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2016/02/teacher-professionalism_g17a2763/5jm3xgskpc40-en.pdf
Seaton, F. S. (2018). Empowering teachers to implement a growth mindset. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2017.1382333
United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2018). World Teachers’ Day 2018: The right to education means the right to a qualified teacher. https://unevoc.unesco.org/home/World+Teachers+Day+2018
Wu, Y., Lian, K., Hong, P., Liu, S., Lin, R. M., & Lian, R. (2019). Teachers’ emotional intelligence and self-efficacy: Mediating role of teaching performance. Social Behavior and Personality, 47(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7869
Zhang, Q., Wu, W., & Jiang, K. (2022). Standardising professional standards: A self-assessment scale for Chinese kindergarten teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(4), 730-748. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2022.2124913