A Design-based Research Approach to Developing a Freshman EMI Compulsory Course: Selection and Application of Teaching Materials
Author: Shu-Hua Tang (Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, National Taiwan Normal University), Sung-Yen Yang (School of Teacher Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Yichung Huang (Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 71, No. 2
Date：June 2026
Pages：137-170
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0005
Abstract：
Research Motivation and Purpose
As English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) becomes central to global higher education, Taiwan’s Bilingual 2030 policy also aims to enhance students’ English proficiency and international competitiveness. However, implementing EMI presents considerable challenges, particularly for freshmen with limited English skills. This study seeks to explore the selection and application of teaching materials in a compulsory freshman EMI course, employing a design-based research (DBR) approach to iteratively improve instructional design and enhance student learning outcomes.
Literature Review
Prior research highlights cognitive, linguistic, and emotional challenges in EMI contexts, including foreign language anxiety, limited comprehension of academic texts, and reduced classroom participation. Theoretical underpinnings include comprehensible input (Krashen, 1982), translanguaging (Cenoz & Gorter, 2021), multimodal learning (Lin, 2016), and flipped classroom strategies (Al-Samarraie et al., 2020). Teachers’ beliefs, material design, and focus on student needs are critical for EMI success.
Research Method
The study employed a three-phase DBR framework, with each phase comprising preparation, design, implementation, and revision stages. Data were collected through student needs surveys, course evaluations, interviews, reflective journals, learning portfolios, and institutional course evaluations. The research team utilized coding, thematic analysis, and triangulation to ensure analytical rigor.
Research Results
Phase 1 (2022, Fall):
- Preparation: Selected an open-access English textbook without Mandarin translation;
- Design: Planned weekly topics and employed lecture-based methods;
- Implementation: Provided pre-recorded videos and bilingual glossaries;
- Revision: Added Mandarin explanations and simplified key concepts in slides after students reported comprehension difficulties.
Phase 2 (2022, Spring):
- Preparation: Introduced flipped learning and multimodal materials;
- Design: Combined text annotations, videos, and local case examples;
- Implementation: Delivered mixed-language guided videos and connected theory to local issues;
- Revision: Reduced reading load, integrated student feedback, and encouraged reflective thinking.
Phase 3 (2023, Fall):
- Preparation: Collaborated with a team to adopt a thematic, multimodal curriculum;
- Design: Created online quizzes, student-led reading groups, and integrated AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT);
- Implementation: Used simplified slides with visual cues and facilitated student-led discussions;
- Revision: Uploaded lecture slides post-class, supported independent learning, and refined assignments based on student needs.
Discussion and Suggestions
This study highlights that flexible material selection, multimodal resources, and translanguaging strategies effectively reduce students’ cognitive overload and enhance engagement in EMI classrooms. Through continuous reflection and collaboration, the teaching team designed a course that helped students gradually progress from dependence on scaffolds toward greater autonomy in learning.
To build on these findings, several suggestions are offered. First, instructors should carefully select thematic, multimodal, and locally relevant materials that align with students’ needs and interests. Providing bilingual scaffolding and clear explanations of key concepts is essential to support comprehension. Incorporating flipped classroom approaches and collaborative tasks can further foster active student engagement and participation. Additionally, integrating generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, offers new opportunities for enhancing learning interactions and deepening understanding. Prioritizing teacher professional development in EMI pedagogy remains critical for sustaining high-quality instruction. Finally, future research should explore the long-term impacts of these strategies on students’ language proficiency, disciplinary knowledge, and their ability to become autonomous learners.
Limitations and Contributions
Since this study focused solely on a first-year compulsory course related to education, the findings may not be generalizable to EMI courses in other colleges or universities. In particular, this research primarily concentrated on the selection and application of teaching materials; therefore, topics such as course design or pedagogical approaches fall outside the study’s scope and represent its limitations. Future studies could explore various intervention strategies tailored to EMI courses across different disciplines, student year levels, and subject characteristics.
Nonetheless, as this study adopted a design-based research approach to examine the selection, support, and application of course materials, it yielded two main contributions through its three-phase process:
Firstly, we shifted from using a full English-language textbook to a theme-based course design, emphasizing quality over quantity to reduce students’ cognitive load. This approach effectively integrated reading materials, alleviated reading pressure, and enhanced learning outcomes by promoting the understanding of core concepts. To support learning, we replaced audio-based previews with multimedia videos that included visual aids and highlighted key points. This combination of visual and auditory elements facilitated intuitive comprehension and further improved learning outcomes.
Secondly, the study recommends that EMI instructors implement supportive strategies before, during, and after class to enhance students’ comprehension of course materials. For instance, assessing students’ preparedness for asynchronous self-study can encourage independent thinking and proactive questioning. Incorporating AI-assisted interactive design promotes higher-order thinking and metacognitive strategies, enabling instructors to tailor instruction to learners’ needs while fostering autonomy and critical thinking skills.
In the classroom, lectures were divided into mini-lectures, each followed by interactive group discussions. These sessions provided opportunities for students to exchange ideas, reflect on the content, and raise questions, thereby deepening their understanding and preparing them for English oral expression. This approach fostered active engagement and deeper learning. Instructors also incorporated diverse formats such as role-plays and case studies to increase engagement and participation.
Presentation materials were redesigned to incorporate multimodal resources and translanguaging strategies, enhancing both classroom interaction and content comprehension. By combining visual and auditory cues with Chinese annotations, students were better able to grasp key concepts and reduce anxiety related to English comprehension. Small group-led reading activities further built a sense of learning community and promoted peer interaction, increasing engagement and deepening understanding through shared discussions.
For post-class assignments, we replaced the full-term learning portfolio with weekly reflection worksheets, which reduced the overall workload and clarified the weekly course structure. This adjustment helped students better organize the course content and supported knowledge retention through structured review and reflection.
While these findings provide valuable insights for EMI instruction, the research team recommends further exploration of instructional materials and learning supports. For example, a multimedia repository or website with organized content by topic or unit– featuring guided previews and summaries– could help students access and use relevant materials more efficiently. Generative AI could also be used to produce practice questions, quizzes, and summaries to support students’ comprehension and retention. In addition, AI could generate differentiated texts based on learners’ proficiency levels, enabling personalized learning paths within EMI contexts.
Future practices should aim to further integrate multimedia tools to encourage self-directed learning and incorporate task-based activities with built-in feedback mechanisms to increase engagement. Exploring real-time feedback systems may also enhance teacher-student interaction and provide scaffolding for English language production. Finally, assessment strategies should be continuously refined based on student feedback and learning outcomes to ensure ongoing improvement in instructional quality.
Keywords：
the selection and application of EMI teaching material, English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI), multimodal learning, design-based research, translanguaging strategy
《Full Text》
References：林秀娟（2021）。在臺灣英語文課程使用英語授課：理論與實踐。國立臺灣師範大學雙語教學研究中心。
【Lin, H.-C. (2021). Teaching English through English in Taiwan: Theory & practice. NTNU Bilingual Education Research Center.】
沈毓敏（2003，5月）。大專院校學生英文原文書閱讀障礙因素之探討（研討會論文）。2003年全國英語教學學術研討會，雲林縣，臺灣。
【Shen, Y.-M. (2003, May). An investigation into factors affecting college students’ reading difficulties with English textbooks [Paper presentation]. The meeting of the 2003 National Conference on English Teaching and Learning, Yunlin, Taiwan.】
周宛青（2018）。高等教育全英語課堂教學個案研究。教學實踐與創新，1（1），155-191。https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492018030101004
【Chow, W.-C. (2018). English-medium instruction in higher education: A case study. Journal of Teaching Practice and Pedagogical Innovation, 1(1), 155-191. https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492018030101004】
周宛青（2025）。臺灣高等教育全英語教學的挑戰：學習者的心聲。臺灣教育研究期刊，6（1），73-109。
【Chow, W.-C. (2025). The challenges of English-medium instruction in Taiwanese higher education: Voices of learners. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 6(1), 73-109.】
翁穎哲、譚克平（2008）。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育月刊，307，15-30。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003
【Weng, Y.-Z., & Tan, K.-P. (2008). Introduction to design-based research and its applications in educational research. Science Education Monthly, 307, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003】
» More
一、中文文獻
林秀娟（2021）。在臺灣英語文課程使用英語授課：理論與實踐。國立臺灣師範大學雙語教學研究中心。
【Lin, H.-C. (2021). Teaching English through English in Taiwan: Theory & practice. NTNU Bilingual Education Research Center.】
沈毓敏（2003，5月）。大專院校學生英文原文書閱讀障礙因素之探討（研討會論文）。2003年全國英語教學學術研討會，雲林縣，臺灣。
【Shen, Y.-M. (2003, May). An investigation into factors affecting college students’ reading difficulties with English textbooks [Paper presentation]. The meeting of the 2003 National Conference on English Teaching and Learning, Yunlin, Taiwan.】
周宛青（2018）。高等教育全英語課堂教學個案研究。教學實踐與創新，1（1），155-191。https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492018030101004
【Chow, W.-C. (2018). English-medium instruction in higher education: A case study. Journal of Teaching Practice and Pedagogical Innovation, 1(1), 155-191. https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492018030101004】
周宛青（2025）。臺灣高等教育全英語教學的挑戰：學習者的心聲。臺灣教育研究期刊，6（1），73-109。
【Chow, W.-C. (2025). The challenges of English-medium instruction in Taiwanese higher education: Voices of learners. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 6(1), 73-109.】
翁穎哲、譚克平（2008）。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育月刊，307，15-30。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003
【Weng, Y.-Z., & Tan, K.-P. (2008). Introduction to design-based research and its applications in educational research. Science Education Monthly, 307, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003】
高郁婷、陳慧琴（2022）。跨語言溝通策略於臺灣高教英語授課之應用。載於鄒文莉、高郁婷、林律君（主編），臺灣高教英語授課教學資源書—全球在地化課程設計與教學實踐（頁59-74）。書林。
【Gao, Y.-T., & Chen, H.-Q. (2022). Cross-linguistic communication strategies in English-medium instruction in Taiwan higher education. In W.-L. Zou, Y.-T. Gao, & L.-J. Lin (Eds.), A resource book for university EMI in Taiwan: A glocalized design & practice (pp. 59-74). Bookman.】
高實玫、林彥良、陳慧琴（2022）。多模態設計在臺灣雙語教學的應用（EMI with Multimodality）。載於鄒文莉、高郁婷、林律君（主編），臺灣高教英語授課教學資源書—全球在地化課程設計與教學實踐（頁37-58）。書林。
【Kao, S.-M., Lin, Y.-L., & Chen, H.-C. (2022). Applications of multimodal design in bilingual education in Taiwan (EMI with Multimodality). In W.-L. Tsou, Y.-T. Kao, & L.-C. Lin (Eds.), A resource book for university EMI in Taiwan: A glocalized design & practice (pp. 37-58). Bookman.】
張春興（2011）。張氏心理學辭典（簡明版）。東華書局。
【Chang, C.-H. (2011). Chang’s dictionary of psychology (Concise edition). TungHua.】
教育部（2021）。大專校院學生雙語化學習計畫。
【Ministry of Education. (2021). The program on bilingual education for students in college.】
教育部（2022）。大專校院學生雙語化學習計畫全英語授課（EMI）指引。
【Ministry of Education. (2022). Guidelines for English-Medium Instruction (EMI) in the college and university student bilingual learning program.】
許瑛玿、莊福泰、林祖強（2012）。解析設計研究法的架構與實施：以科學教育研究為例。教育科學研究期刊，57（1），1-27。
【Hsu, Y.-S., Chuang, F.-T., & Lin T.-C. (2012). Exploring the framework and implementation of the design research method in science education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(1), 1-27.】
陳浩然、鄭雅双、郭亭吟、林欣儀（2020）。東北亞四國英語教育政策之比較。教育科學研究期刊，65（1），1-26。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1). 0001
【Chen, H.-J., Cheng, Y.-S., Kuo, T.-Y., & Lin, H.-Y. (2020). Comparison of English education policies in east Asian countries. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202003_ 65(1).0001】
陳廉偉、譚寧君（2010）。發展國小資優兒童之數學教學方案—以面積概念爲例。數理學科教學知能，2，45-67。https://doi.org/10.6614/pck.2010.2.45
【Chen, L.-W., & Tan, N.-C. (2010). A study of designing and implementing conceptual teaching program for gifted students: Area concept. PCK in Science and Mathematics, 2, 45-67. https://doi.org/10.6614/pck.2010.2.45】
黃玉（2000）。大學學生事務的理論基礎—臺灣大學生心理社會發展之研究。公民訓育學報，9，161-200。https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2000(9)07
【Huang, Y. (2000). A theory foundation in college student affairs-psychosocial development of college students in Taiwan. Bulletin of Civic and Moral Education, 9, 161-200. https://doi.org/10.6231/CME.2000(9)07】
黃韞臻、林淑惠（2014）。大一新生學校生活適應量表之發展。測驗學刊，61（2），259-281.
【Huang, Y.-C., & Lin S.-H. (2014). An inventory of school adaptation for college freshmen. Psychological Testing, 61(2), 259-281.】
鄒文莉、高郁婷（2022）。全球在地化臺灣高教英語授課教學。載於鄒文莉、高郁婷、林律君（主編），臺灣高教英語授課教學資源書—全球在地化課程設計與教學實踐（頁1-16）。書林。
【Tsou, W.-L., & Kao, Y.-T. (2022). Glocalization of English-medium instruction in Taiwan higher education. In W.-L. Tsou, Y.-T. Kao, & L.-C. Lin (Eds.), A resource book for university EMI in Taiwan: A glocalized design & practice (pp. 1-16). Bookman.】
劉美慧、鄭景澤（2024）。大學推動全英語課程的挑戰與展望：從學生觀點分析。教育研究月刊，358，18-32。https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602024020358002
【Liu, M.-H., & Cheng, C.-T. (2024). Challenges and prospects of implementing EMI courses in the university: An analysis from students’ perspectives. Journal of Education Research, 358, 18-32. https://doi.org/10.53106/ 168063602024020358002】
鍾智林（2021）。以混成學習精進英語授課課程之行動研究。大學教學實務與研究學刊，5（1），71-103。https://doi.org/10.6870/JTPRHE.202106_5(1).0003
【Chung, C.-L. (2021). Action research on improvement of EMI courses by blended learning. Journal of Teaching Practice and Research on Higher Education, 5(1), 71-103. https://doi.org/10.6870/JTPRHE.202106_5(1). 0003】
二、外文文獻
Al Zumor, A. Q. (2024). Challenges of using EMI in teaching and learning university scientific disciplines: Student voice. International Journal of Language Education, 5(3), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i3p1
Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as a medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: The gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77, 1125-1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0323-5
Ajoke, A. R. (2017). The importance of instructional materials in teaching English as a second language. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 6(9), 36-44.
Al-Samarraie, H., Shamsuddin, A., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2020). A flipped classroom model in higher education: A review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1017-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09718-8
An, J., Macaro, E., & Childs, A. (2021). Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference? System, 98, Article 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102482
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
Andrade, M. S. (2006). International students in English-speaking universities: Adjustment factors. Journal of Research in International Education, 5(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/147524 0906065589
Ariyan, M. A., & Pavlova, L. V. (2019, February). An English language textbook: A friend or a foe [Paper presentation]. The meeting of the International Conference Going Global through Social Sciences and Humanities, Tomsk, Russia.
Belhiah, H., & Elhami, M. (2015). English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When students and teachers speak. Language Policy, 14, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9336-9
Bilikozen, N. (2019). The case of “underdeveloped” academic literacy skills of undergraduates: Contrasting perspectives. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 11(2), 197-223.
Bolton, K., Botha, W., & Lin, B. (2024). English-Medium Instruction in higher education worldwide. In K. Bolton, W. Botha, & B. Lin (Eds). The Routledge handbook of English-Medium Instruction in higher education (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
Briggs, J. G., Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Comparing teacher beliefs in secondary and tertiary education. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 673-696. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.7
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2021). Pedagogical translanguaging. Cambridge University Press.
Chalapati, S., Leung, R., & Chalapati, N. (2018). Exploring factors affecting first-year students’ learning experiences: A case study of a private university in Taiwan. Student Success, 9(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v9i4.651
Chapple, J. (2015). Teaching in English is not necessarily the teaching of English. International Education Studies, 8(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p1
Clinton, V. (2018). Savings without sacrifice: A case report on open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 177-189. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02680513.2018.1486184
Çoban, M., & Razı, S. (2022). Questioning the metacognitive reading strategies in an English-Medium Instruction (EMI) setting. In Y. Kirkgöz & A. Karakaş (Eds.), English as the medium of instruction in Turkish higher education (pp. 217-231). Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88597-7_11
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. In S. A. Barab & K. Squire (Eds.), Design-based research (pp. 15-42). Psychology Press.
Costa, F., & Coleman, J. A. (2012). A survey of English-medium instruction in Italian higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.676621
De Clercq, M., Roland, N., Brunelle, M., Galand, B., & Frenay, M. (2018). The delicate balance to adjustment: A qualitative approach of student’s transition to the first year at university. Psychologica Belgica, 58(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.409
Dearden, J. (2015). English as a medium of instruction– A growing phenomenon. British Council.
Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121.
Edwards, H., Wesche, M., Krashen, S., Clement, R., & Kruidenier, B. (1984). Second-language acquisition through subject-matter learning: A study of sheltered psychology classes at the University of Ottawa. Canadian Modern Language Review, 41(2), 268-282.
Ekoç, A. (2020). English Medium Instruction (EMI) from the perspectives of students at a technical university in Turkey. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0309877X.2018.1527025
Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. John Wiley & Sons.
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses, revised and updated. John Wiley & Sons.
Funk, H. (2012). Four models of language learning and acquisition and their methodological implications for textbook design. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(1), 298-311.
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2021). English medium instruction and the English language practitioner. ELT Journal, 75(1), 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa063
Griffiths, C. (2023). The practice of EMI around the world: An overview. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), The practice of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) around the world (pp. 7-12). Springer.
Griggs, R. A., & Jackson, S. L. (2013). Introductory psychology textbooks: An objective analysis update. Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 163-168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313487455
Grissett, J. O., & Huffman, C. (2019). An open versus traditional psychology textbook: Student performance, perceptions, and use. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 21-35. https://doi. org/10.1177/1475725718810181
Hamid, M. O., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Baldauf, R. B. (2013). Medium of instruction in Asia: Context, processes and outcomes. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14664208.2013.792130
Hauptman, P. C., Wesche, M. B., & Ready, D. (1988). Second‐language acquisition through subject‐matter learning: A follow‐up study at the University of Ottawa. Language Learning, 38(3), 433-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00419.x
Hellekjær, G. O. (2010). Lecture comprehension in English-medium higher education. HERMES- Journal of Language and Communication in Business, 45, 11-34. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb. v23i45.97343
Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: A review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 573-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9434-9
Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000071
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317
Howard, V. J., & Whitmore, C. B. (2020). Evaluating student perceptions of open and commercial psychology textbooks. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article139. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc. 2020.00139
Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction at a Chinese University: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9298-3
Huang, Y. P. (2009). English-only instruction in post-secondary education in Taiwan: Voices from students. Hwa Kang Journal of English Language and Literature, 15, 145-157. https://doi.org/ 10.7109/HKJELL.200906.0145
Huang, Y. P. (2018). Learner resistance to English-medium instruction practices: A qualitative case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017. 1421629
Ismailov, M., Chiu, T. K., Dearden, J., Yamamoto, Y., & Djalilova, N. (2021). Challenges to internationalisation of university programmes: A systematic thematic synthesis of qualitative research on learner-centred English Medium Instruction (EMI) pedagogy. Sustainability, 13(22), 12642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212642
Kim, K. R. (2011). Korean professor and student perceptions of the efficacy of English-medium instruction. Linguistic Research, 28(3), 711-741. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.28.3.201112. 013
Kök, I. (2023). The practice of EMI around the world: A metaview. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), The practice of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) around the world (pp. 227-244). Springer.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
Lafayette, R. C., & Buscaglia, M. (1985). Students learn language via a civilization course– A comparison of second language classroom environments. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005568
Landrum, R. E., & Hormel, L. (2002). Textbook selection: Balance between the pedagogy, the publisher, and the student. Teaching of Psychology, 29(3), 245-248.
Li, N., & Wu, J. (2018). Exploring assessment for learning practices in the EMI classroom in the context of Taiwanese higher education. Language Education & Assessment, 1(1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.29140/lea.v1n1.46
Lin, A. M. Y. (2016). Language across the curriculum and CLIL in English as an additional language contexts: Theory and practice. Springer.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teacher, 51(1), 36-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0261444817000350
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Learning compass 2030. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/concept-notes/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_concept_note.pdf
Phuong, Y. H., & Nguyen, T. T. (2019). Students’ perceptions towards the benefits and drawbacks of EMI classes. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 88-100.
Pun, J. K. H., & Thomas, N. (2020). English medium instruction: Teachers’ challenges and coping strategies. ELT Journal, 74(3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa024
Richards, J. C., & Pun, J. (2022). Teaching and learning in English medium instruction: An introduction. Routledge.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Rose, H. (2021). Students’ language-related challenges of studying through English: What EMI teachers can do. In D. Lasagabaster & A. Doiz (Eds.), Language use in English-medium instruction at university (pp. 145-166). Routledge.
Rose, H., & Galloway, N. (2019). Global Englishes for language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2018). Japan’s English-medium instruction initiatives and the globalization of higher education. Higher Education, 75, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s107 34-017-0125-1
Rose, H., Macaro, E., Sahan, K., Aizawa, I., Zhou, S., & Wei, M. (2023). Defining English medium instruction: Striving for comparative equivalence. Language Teaching, 56(4), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000483
Schoenfeld, A. (2006). Design experiments. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Setyowati, Y., Astutik, A., & Shanty, A. Y. P. S. (2023). Need analysis course design: ESP textbook evaluation in the psychology faculty. Edulitics Journal, 8(2), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.52166/ edulitics.v8i2.5205
Shao, L., & Rose, H. (2024). Teachers’ experiences of English-medium instruction in higher education: A cross case investigation of China, Japan and the Netherlands. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(7), 2801-2816. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01434632.2022.2073358
Soruç, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). English as a medium of instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx017
Tomlinson, B. (2008). Language acquisition and language learning materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), English language learning materials (pp. 3-13). Continuum.
Tsui, C. (2018). Teacher efficacy: A case study of faculty beliefs in an English medium instruction teacher training program. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 15(1), 101-128. https://doi.org/10.30397/ TJTESOL.201804_15(1).0004
Warming, E. O., & Baber, E. C. (1980). Touchstones for textbook selection. Phi Delta Kappan, 61(10), 694-695.
Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT Journal, 37(3), 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/37.3.251
Yang, M., O’Sullivan, P. S., Irby, D. M., Chen, Z., Lin, C., & Lin, C. (2019). Challenges and adaptations in implementing an English-medium medical program: A case study in China. BMC Medical Education, 19, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1452-3
Yeh, C. C. (2014). Taiwanese students’ experiences and attitudes towards English-medium courses in tertiary education. RELC Journal, 45(3), 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214555358
Zhang, X. (2017). A critical review of literature on English language teaching textbook evaluation: What systemic functional linguistics can offer. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 5(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2017-0005