How Is It Possible to Turn Over a New Leaf: Moral Epiphany and the Potential Role of Character Education
Author: Yi-Lin Chen (Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 71, No. 1
Date:March 2026
Pages:291-318
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202603_71(1).0010
Abstract:
Contemporary character education is primarily grounded in Aristotelian virtue ethics, emphasizing the cultivation of appropriate moral habits from an early age. However, it remains largely silent on how moral transformation might occur when this crucial developmental period is missed, resulting in individuals of corrupt character. While Aristotle explicitly acknowledges the possibility of moral reformation, he does not elaborate on how such transformation might take place. Addressing this theoretical gap, neo-Aristotelian scholar Kristján Kristjánsson, drawing inspiration from Platonic ideas, introduces the concept of “moral epiphany” as a potential breakthrough. This concept not only fills a theoretical void but also offers a practical pathway for moral education. Against this backdrop, this study asks: In cases where individuals lack early moral habituation, the guidance of moral friends, or sufficient intellectual virtue for contemplative self-reflection, how can moral epiphany– a moment of profound moral awakening– still occur? This question is particularly relevant to cases of radical moral transformation, including instances of moral reformation among individuals of corrupt character. Accordingly, this study explores the nature of epiphany, its various types and attributes, and how character education might facilitate moral epiphanies.
It is worth addressing in advance why moral epiphany has been largely overlooked in past (character) education research. Although education, as an endeavor aimed at cultivating individuals, inherently involves transformation and becoming, it is typically conceived as a gradual, long-term process– an undertaking that requires patience and persistence, akin to the proverbial “hundred-year project” of nurturing a person. The transformative power of education is generally understood as incremental, akin to water gradually wearing away stone, emphasizing slow and steady change rather than abrupt shifts. In contrast, epiphany represents a sudden, drastic, and often profound transformation, occurring in a moment of radical insight. This stark difference renders epiphany an anomaly in the discourse on education, often leading to its exclusion from mainstream academic discussions on educational transformation.
This research falls within the domain of philosophy of education and employs conceptual analysis to examine the notion of moral epiphany. By analyzing various cases of epiphany, this study identifies its key attributes and elucidates how education might foster such transformative experiences.
Through a comparative analysis of different types of epiphanies– such as intellectual, aesthetic, religious, and moral epiphanies– this paper focuses specifically on moral epiphany. Unlike the paradigmatic case of Paul on the road to Damascus, moral epiphany differs in at least three key respects. First, moral insight gained through epiphany does not guarantee immediate or complete moral transformation. Second, moral epiphany does not necessarily presuppose the existence of a transcendent being, such as a deity or spirit. Third, moral epiphany is inherently connected to ethical values and has the potential to inspire a fundamental shift in one’s mode of being.
Overall, moral epiphany possesses six defining characteristics. First, it is a sudden, immediate, and sometimes even catastrophic turning point. Second, it involves a spontaneous and dramatic awakening, often accompanied by a radical reconfiguration of one’s psychological framework. Third, the events or factors that trigger moral epiphany are typically unplanned or fortuitous. Fourth, moral epiphany is usually accompanied by intense emotional experiences, such as awe or moral elevation. Fifth, it often entails a radical transformation of the self. Sixth, moral epiphany generally leads to positive moral progress rather than moral deterioration– although the latter possibility cannot be entirely dismissed.
In essence, epiphany represents an extraordinary moment of insight that induces a Gestalt shift in one’s cognitive perspective. In the case of moral epiphany, this newfound moral vision is marked by penetrating clarity, allowing the individual to perceive ethical value. This experience is typically accompanied by powerful emotional responses, such as awe or moral elevation, which awaken a deep yearning to embody a new mode of existence. As a catalyst for moral transformation and awakening, moral epiphany, when followed by proper moral re-habituation, has the potential to facilitate radical self-transformation.
This study argues that while educators cannot guarantee the occurrence of epiphany, and while epiphanies alone are insufficient without subsequent habituation, educators can nevertheless create conditions conducive to epiphany. Specifically, they can strategically invoke strong emotional responses, such as awe or moral elevation, to trigger cognitive shifts. Following the Socratic approach, educators may also cultivate moments of confusion or disorientation, disrupting students’ conventional experiences and thereby creating opportunities for epiphany. These transformative experiences, in turn, can lay the groundwork for moral re-habituation, increasing the likelihood of long-term moral growth.
This study posits that the Aristotelian model of character education– centered on moral habituation and the support of moral friends– represents the “royal road” to virtue. However, given its limitations in accounting for real-life cases of moral transformation, this paper explores moral epiphany as an alternative “winding path” to character development. This metaphor underscores two key ideas: first, that this pathway is not a direct or straightforward route; second, that it is not the norm for most individuals, but rather a relatively rare and unconventional experience. Yet, the scarcity of discourse on moral epiphany in educational scholarship may itself be a reason why this pathway remains underexplored and underutilized. This study, therefore, seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of moral epiphany and its potential applications in education.
The significance of this research is twofold. First, it addresses a theoretical gap in Aristotelian character education by proposing moral epiphany as a complementary concept. Second, by analyzing real-life cases of moral transformation, it explores the potential triggers and mechanisms that facilitate epiphanies, offering insights that educators may leverage in practice.
After understanding the attributes of epiphany and its potential applicability in education, future research should further explore concrete pedagogical strategies for fostering moral epiphany in character education. Specifically, scholars may investigate how educators can deliberately create conditions conducive to epiphany cultivation, ensuring that transformative moral insights are not left to chance. This includes designing structured interventions, crafting meaningful learning experiences, and identifying key triggers that facilitate moral awakening. A more in-depth and comprehensive discussion on the systematic implementation of epiphany cultivation in educational practice would significantly enhance both theoretical and practical contributions to character education.
Keywords:turn over a new leaf, character education, habituation, awe, epiphany
《Full Text》
References:辛彩娜(2021)。導讀:《都柏林人》:一個城市的畫像。載於J. Joyce,都柏林人(辛彩娜,譯)(頁7-18)。時報。
【Xin, C.-N. (2021). Introduction: Dubliners– A portrait of a city. In J. Joyce, Dubliners (C.-N. Xin, Trans., pp. 7-18). China Times Publishing Company.】
使徒行傳(和合本),第二十二章(無日期)。2024年9月9日,取自https://springbible.fhl.net/ Bible2/cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=1040&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0
【Chinese Union Version. (n.d.). Acts 22. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://springbible.fhl.net/Bible2/ cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=1040&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0】
馬太福音(和合本),第二章(無日期)。2024年9月9日,取自https://springbible.fhl.net/ Bible2/cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=931&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0
【Chinese Union Version. (n.d.). Matthew 2. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://springbible.fhl.net/Bible2/ cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=931&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0】
陳伊琳(2022)。亞里斯多德觀點下的友愛/友誼與幸福人生。生命教育研究,14(2),1-33。https://doi. org/10.53106/207466012022121402001
【Chen, Y.-L. (2022). On philia/friendship and happiness: An Aristotelian perspective. Journal of Life Education, 14(2), 1-33. https://doi. org/10.53106/207466012022121402001】
陳伊琳(2025)。道德美感與電影欣賞教學:以《辛德勒的名單》為例。載於李崗(主編),美學思考與欣賞教學(頁147-174)。五南。
【Chen, Y.-L. (2025). Moral aesthetics and film appreciation teaching: A case study of Schindler’s List. In K. Lee (Ed.), Aesthetic thinking and appreciation teaching (pp. 147-174). Wu-Nan Book.】
» More
一、中文文獻
辛彩娜(2021)。導讀:《都柏林人》:一個城市的畫像。載於J. Joyce,都柏林人(辛彩娜,譯)(頁7-18)。時報。
【Xin, C.-N. (2021). Introduction: Dubliners– A portrait of a city. In J. Joyce, Dubliners (C.-N. Xin, Trans., pp. 7-18). China Times Publishing Company.】
使徒行傳(和合本),第二十二章(無日期)。2024年9月9日,取自https://springbible.fhl.net/ Bible2/cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=1040&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0
【Chinese Union Version. (n.d.). Acts 22. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://springbible.fhl.net/Bible2/ cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=1040&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0】
馬太福音(和合本),第二章(無日期)。2024年9月9日,取自https://springbible.fhl.net/ Bible2/cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=931&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0
【Chinese Union Version. (n.d.). Matthew 2. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://springbible.fhl.net/Bible2/ cgic201/read201.cgi?na=0&chap=931&ver=&ft=0&temp=-1&tight=0】
陳伊琳(2022)。亞里斯多德觀點下的友愛/友誼與幸福人生。生命教育研究,14(2),1-33。https://doi. org/10.53106/207466012022121402001
【Chen, Y.-L. (2022). On philia/friendship and happiness: An Aristotelian perspective. Journal of Life Education, 14(2), 1-33. https://doi. org/10.53106/207466012022121402001】
陳伊琳(2025)。道德美感與電影欣賞教學:以《辛德勒的名單》為例。載於李崗(主編),美學思考與欣賞教學(頁147-174)。五南。
【Chen, Y.-L. (2025). Moral aesthetics and film appreciation teaching: A case study of Schindler’s List. In K. Lee (Ed.), Aesthetic thinking and appreciation teaching (pp. 147-174). Wu-Nan Book.】
魯迅(2022)。一件小事。載於魯迅經典小說集:吶喊(二版,頁 66-68)。好讀。
【Lu, X. (2022). A small incident. In Classic novels of Lu Xun: Call to arms (2nd ed., pp. 66-68). Haodoo.】
Dickens, C.(2002)。小氣財神(正中書局編輯部,譯)。正中。(原著出版於1843年)
【Dickens, C. (2002). A Christmas carol (Cheng Chung Bookstore Editorial Department, Trans.). Cheng Chung Book. (Original work published 1843)】
Frankl, V.(2003)。追尋生命的意義(何忠強、楊鳳池,譯)。新華。(原著出版於1946年)
【Frankl, V. (2003). Man’s search for meaning (Z.-Q. He & F.-C. Yang, Trans.). Xinhua. (Original work published 1946)】
Netflix(n.d.)。聖誕頌歌:查爾斯.狄更斯經典童話[影片]。Netflix。2024年9月9日,取自https://www.netflix.com/title/81230004
【Netflix. (n.d.). Scrooge: A Christmas Carol [Film]. Netflix. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www.netflix. com/title/81230004】
二、外文文獻
Aldridge, D. (2014). Three epiphanic fragments: Education and the essay in memory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 512-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2012.762503
Aristotle (1984). Categories. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 1, pp. 3-24). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vjv4w.6 (Original work published n.d.)
Aristotle. (2009). The Nicomachean Ethics (W. D. Ross, Trans., L. Brown, Rev.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published n.d.)
Arnold, K. (2003). Anti-epiphany and the Jungian Manikin: Toward a theory of prepsychotic perceptual alterations. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33(2), 245-275. https://doi. org/10.1163/15691620260622912
Ballard, W. W. (2023). Epiphany as a pragmatic response to claims of indoctrination in public schools. Theory and Research in Education, 21(3), 304-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785 231206342
Bidney, M. (1997). Patterns of epiphany: From Wordsworth to Tolstoy, Pater and Barrett Browning. Southern Illinois University Press.
Chappell, S. G. (2019). Introducing epiphanies. Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie, 2, 95-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-019-00029-4
Chappell, S. G. (2022). Epiphanies: An ethics of experience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192858016.001.0001
Chilton, J. M. (2015). Transformation from within: A concept analysis of epiphany. Creative Nursing, 21(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.21.1.15
Dostoyevsky, F. M. (2017). The dream of a ridiculous man (C. Garnett, Trans.). CreateSpace. (Original work published 1877)
Epiphany. (n.d.). In Online etymology dictionary. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www. etymonline.com/word/epiphany
Gary, K., & Chambers, D. (2021). Cultivating moral epiphanies. Educational Theory, 71(3), 371-388.
https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12487
Haidt, J. (2000). The positive emotion of elevation. Prevention & Treatment, 3(1), 1-5. https://doi. org/10.1037/1522-3736.3.1.33c
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. The Modern Library.
Jonas, M. E. (2015). Education for epiphany: The case of Plato’s Lysis. Educational Theory, 65(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12094
Jonas, M. E., & Nakazawa, Y. (2021). A Platonic theory of moral education: Cultivating virtue in contemporary democratic classrooms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429276255
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17(2), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930302297
Knight, G. R. (1982). Issues & alternatives in educational philosophy. Andrews University Press.
Kotsonis, A. (2023). Moral exemplarism as a powerful indoctrinating tool. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 57, 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-021-09844-8
Kristjánsson, K. (2006). Habituated reason: Aristotle and the “paradox of moral education”. Theory and Research in Education, 4(1), 101-122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878506060699
Kristjánsson, K. (2014). Undoing bad upbringing through contemplation: An Aristotelian reconstruction. Journal of Moral Education, 43(4), 468-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240. 2014.902809
Kristjánsson, K. (2015). Aristotelian character education. Routledge.
Kristjánsson, K. (2019). Epiphanic moral conversions: Going beyond Kohlberg and Aristotle. In J. A. Frey & C. Vogler (Eds.), Self-transcendence and virtue: Perspective from philosophy, psychology, and theology (pp. 15-38). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469572-2
Kristjánsson, K. (2020). Flourishing as the aim of education: A neo-Aristotelian view. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429464898
Kupperman, J. J. (1991). Character. Oxford University Press.
Lickona, T. (1998). Foreword. In M. M. Murphy, Character education in America’s Blue Ribbon schools: Best practices for meeting the challenge (pp. xiii-xv). Technomic.
Mason, S. (2007). The role of epiphanies in moral reflection and narrative thinking: Connectedness and good teaching. Interchange, 38(4), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-007-9036-x
McDonald, M. G. (2008). The nature of epiphanic experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(1), 89-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167807311878
Miller, W. R. (2004). The phenomenon of quantum change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(5), 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20000
Miller, W. R., & C’de Baca, J. (1994). Quantum change: Toward a psychology of transformation. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 253-280). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10143-011
Miller, W. R., & C’de Baca, J. (2001). Quantum change: When epiphanies and sudden insights transform ordinary lives. The Guilford Press.
Mishra, V. K., & Mishra, B. (2012). Aesthetic experience and epiphany in Bildungsroman: A reading of James Joyce’s a portrait of the artist as a young man. The Atlantic Critical Review, 11(3), 31-43.
Sanderse, W. (2015). An Aristotelian model of moral development. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 49(3), 382-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12109
Sanderse, W. (2020). Does Aristotle believe that habituation is only for children? Journal of Moral Education, 49(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2018.1497952
Sherman, N. (1999). The habituation of character. In N. Sherman (Ed.), Aristotle’s ethics: Critical essays (pp. 231-260). Rowman & Littlefield.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
Yacek, D. (2021). The transformative classroom: Philosophical foundations and practical applications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367853174
Yacek, D. W., & Gary, K. (2020). Transformative experience and epiphany in education. Theory and Research in Education, 18(2), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878520957276
Yu, J. (2007). The ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of virtue. Routledge. https://doi.org/10. 4324/9780203940327