(Special Issue) Traversing the Interface Between Mind and Culture: An Educational Reflection on J. Bruner’s Theory of Representation
Author: Jin Huang (School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University; Committee on Basic Theory of Early Childhood Education, China National Society of Early Childhood Education (CNSECE)), Ying-hui Yang (School of Education Science, Nanjing Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 71, No. 1
Date：March 2026
Pages：103-128
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202603_71(1).0004
Abstract：
Motivation from the Initial Literature Review
The influential role of Bruner’s theory of representation in inspiring technological innovations– most notably Alan Kay’s development of the Graphical User Interface (GUI) – highlights a profound yet insufficiently examined interplay between cognitive theory, technological design, and educational practice. Despite the extensive discussion of Bruner’s ideas in education and psychology, the translational link between theoretical insight and practical or technological realization remains largely unexplored. This study aims to address this gap.
The Purpose of the Study Was Confirmed by a Further Literature Review
The intellectual lineage of the concept of “representation” can be traced from its epistemological foundations in modern philosophy to its pivotal role in educational thought. Descartes’ mind–body dualism established the core representationalism premise that knowledge arises from the mind’s internal representation of external reality– a view later refined by rationalist and empiricist traditions, which collectively reinforced the modern subject-object dichotomy. In educational psychology, this paradigm first manifested in associationist and behaviorist theories, which framed learning as a process of passive reception or external reinforcement, portraying knowledge as a mere reflection of an objective world. In contrast, genetic epistemology, particularly as developed by Piaget, emphasized the active and developmental nature of thought. While both Piaget and Bruner shared a deep concern with how children’s representational capacities emerge through interaction with the world, their theoretical trajectories diverged significantly. In order to uncover the value and significance of Bruner’s theory of representation, this study addresses three interrelated questions: (1) How has the concept of representation evolved within the intellectual tradition of developmental psychology? (2) How has it inspired and shaped technological and educational practices? (3) What is its contemporary intellectual and educational significance?
Methodology
The methodological approach of this study is grounded in textual analysis and interpretive intellectual history, exploring the trajectory of the concept of representation across philosophical, psychological, and educational thought. A comparative analysis of seminal works by Piaget and Bruner– particularly The Language and Thought of the Child (1923), Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood (1945), Studies in Cognitive Growth (1966), Toward a Theory of Instruction (1966), and Acts of Meaning (1990)– forms the core of this inquiry, highlighting their theoretical divergences regarding cognitive development, cultural understanding, and pedagogy. This analysis is further informed by the scholarship of Alan Kay, David Olson, and Howard Gardner, as well as biographical materials, to examine the broader impact of Bruner’s theory of representation within technological and educational domains, ultimately framing it as a generative interface between mind and culture.
Finding One: Bruner’s Inheritance and Extension of Piaget’s Theory
Piaget conceived representation as the logical form of cognitive structure, emphasizing its developmental progression from sensorimotor schemas to symbolic representation and ultimately to abstract logical reasoning. His work sought to uncover the internal mechanisms through which children abstract general concepts and logical structures from concrete operational activity. In Piaget’s view, the sensorimotor stage constitutes a pre-representational phase in which the child has not yet developed genuine representational capacity. He maintained that as biological maturation proceeds and experience with the external world accumulates, the individual’s mental structures are gradually constructed in a stagewise manner, enabling the continuous evolution and expansion of representational functions within mental activity. Bruner inherited this developmental orientation but transcended Piaget’s biological determinism and rigid stage theory by proposing that representation has both cultural and symbolic dimensions. Through the parallel systems of enactive, iconic, and symbolic representation, Bruner reconceived cognition not as isolated mental computation but as meaning-making through cultural tools and social interaction. In doing so, he shifted the theory of representation from an internal cognitive mechanism to a psychological-cultural process of co-construction..
Finding Two: Theoretical Inspiration for Graphical Interface Technology
This study finds that Bruner’s representational theory provided a foundational framework for the development of the Graphical User Interface (GUI), notably influencing pioneers such as Alan Kay. Kay operationalized Bruner’s continuum of enactive, iconic, and symbolic representation by transforming abstract command-line operations into a visual and directly manipulable interface. This design, grounded in the bodily and intuitive aspects of enactive and iconic interaction, significantly lowered the barrier to digital system use. It enabled a diverse range of users– from children to adults– to interact with computers in culturally meaningful ways, thereby democratizing access and humanizing technology. Bruner’s insight that cognition operates through interaction with symbolic environments and external amplifiers laid the epistemological and pedagogical foundation for subsequent innovations in human-computer interaction and learning technologies.
Finding Three: Educational Significance of Bruner’s Representational Theory
Bruner’s theory conceptualizes learning as a dialogic process mediated by culture, where individuals construct meaning through interaction with cultural tools. Consequently, education should not be confined to the mere reproduction of knowledge but must focus on cultivating cultural contexts that facilitate meaning-making. A central task for educators is to guide learners in navigating flexibly among enactive, iconic, and symbolic representational modes, thereby fostering diverse cognitive pathways and enhancing creativity. This perspective has profound implications for curriculum design, disciplinary pedagogy, and the learning environment: instruction must prioritize the diversity and mediational capacity of representational forms, transforming learning into a practice of exploring “possible worlds.” In this framework, representation becomes a pivotal concept linking cognitive development, cultural formation, and educational innovation.
Discussion and Suggestions for Future Research
Bruner ultimately conceptualized representation as an interface between mind and culture, redefining education not as the transmission of knowledge but as the cultivation of understanding and the awakening of a sense of possibility within cultural symbol systems. This idea– central to his later cultural psychology– gains renewed significance in the convergence of technology and education: when representation becomes the interface through which humans communicate with the world, education itself becomes a process of cultural renewal. Future research may further explore the transformative potential of representational theory within the contexts of artificial intelligence and mediated learning, as well as the tensions among multiple forms of expression in children’s developmental processes. Such inquiries could illuminate its implications for curriculum design, teacher education, and the philosophy of cultural education. This would extend Bruner’s vision– that educators should strive to create interfaces capable of dissolving the boundaries between mind and culture, theory and experience. The ultimate aim, however, does not lie in technological innovation per se, but in fostering human self-realization through education, achieved by means of equitable interaction and the richness of communicative exchange.
Keywords：mind, childhood education, representation
《Full Text》
References：尕藏草（2023）。被計算的童年：數據主義對兒童成長的影響。學前教育研究，337（1），50-59。https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2023.01.008
【Ga, Z.-C. (2023). Calculated childhood: The influences of dataism on children. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 337(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2023.01.008】
張衛民、陳晨（2025）。布魯納敘事思維視域下兒童教育的理論闡釋與實踐探索。學前教育研究，366（6），70-78。https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2025.06.004
【Zhang, W.-M., & Chen, C. (2025). Theoretical interpretation and practical exploration of children’s education from the perspective of Bruner’s narrative thinking. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 366(6), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2025.06.004】
單文經、蔣美霞（2024）。綜述Bruner等人執行的兩項鷹架研究並探討其教學意涵。教育科學研究期刊，69（3），227-258。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0008
【Shan, W.-J., & Jiang, M.-X. (2024). An overview of two studies on scaffolding in learning conducted by Bruner et al. and an exploration of their pedagogical implications. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 69(3), 227-258. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0008】
黃進、楊穎慧（2023）。在探尋「意義」的航程中相遇─晚年布魯納與瑞吉歐的交往史考察。比較教育研究，45（5），52-61。https://doi.org/10.20013/j.cnki.ICE.2023.05.06
【Huang, J., & Yang, Y.-H. (2023). The meeting on the voyage of exploring “meaning”– Study on the communication history between elderly Bruner and Reggio. International and Comparative Education, 45(5), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.20013/j.cnki.ICE.2023.05.06】
楊穎慧（2024）。笛卡兒與盧梭：他心問題域中的理解兒童探究。學前教育研究，351（3），38-51。https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2024.03.004
【Yang, Y.-H. (2024). Descartes and Rousseau: An inquiry into how to understand children in the problem of other minds. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 351(3), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2024.03.004】
» More
一、中文文獻
尕藏草（2023）。被計算的童年：數據主義對兒童成長的影響。學前教育研究，337（1），50-59。https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2023.01.008
【Ga, Z.-C. (2023). Calculated childhood: The influences of dataism on children. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 337(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2023.01.008】
張衛民、陳晨（2025）。布魯納敘事思維視域下兒童教育的理論闡釋與實踐探索。學前教育研究，366（6），70-78。https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2025.06.004
【Zhang, W.-M., & Chen, C. (2025). Theoretical interpretation and practical exploration of children’s education from the perspective of Bruner’s narrative thinking. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 366(6), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2025.06.004】
單文經、蔣美霞（2024）。綜述Bruner等人執行的兩項鷹架研究並探討其教學意涵。教育科學研究期刊，69（3），227-258。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0008
【Shan, W.-J., & Jiang, M.-X. (2024). An overview of two studies on scaffolding in learning conducted by Bruner et al. and an exploration of their pedagogical implications. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 69(3), 227-258. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0008】
黃進、楊穎慧（2023）。在探尋「意義」的航程中相遇─晚年布魯納與瑞吉歐的交往史考察。比較教育研究，45（5），52-61。https://doi.org/10.20013/j.cnki.ICE.2023.05.06
【Huang, J., & Yang, Y.-H. (2023). The meeting on the voyage of exploring “meaning”– Study on the communication history between elderly Bruner and Reggio. International and Comparative Education, 45(5), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.20013/j.cnki.ICE.2023.05.06】
楊穎慧（2024）。笛卡兒與盧梭：他心問題域中的理解兒童探究。學前教育研究，351（3），38-51。https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2024.03.004
【Yang, Y.-H. (2024). Descartes and Rousseau: An inquiry into how to understand children in the problem of other minds. Studies in Early Childhood Education, 351(3), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.13861/j.cnki.sece.2024.03.004】
Aristotle.（2003）。詩學（陳中梅，譯）。商務印書館。（原著出版無日期）
【Aristotle. (2003). Poetics (Z.-M. Chen, Trans.). The Commercial Press. (Original work published n.d.)】
Bruner, J.（2008）。有意義的行為（魏志敏，譯）。吉林人民。（原著出版於1990年）
【Bruner, J. (2008). Act of meaning (Z.-M. Wei, Trans.). Jilin People. (Original work published 1990)】
Bruner, J.（2011）。教育文化。載於宋文里、黃小鵬（譯），布魯納教育文化觀（頁89-340）。首都師範大學出版社。（原著出版於1996年）
【Bruner, J. (2011). The culture of education. In W.-L. Song & X.-P. Huang (Trans.), Bruner’s educational and cultural perspective (pp. 89-340). Capital Normal University Press. (Original work published 1996)】
Bruner, J.（2018）。教學論探討。載於邵瑞珍等（譯），布魯納教育論著選（頁86-250）。人民教育出版社。（原著出版於1966年）
【Bruner, J. (2018). Toward a theory of instruction. In R.-Z. Shao et al. (Trans.), Bruner’s selected educational works (pp. 86-250). People’s Education Press. (Original work published 1966)】
Bruner, J.（2018）。論教學的若干原則。載於邵瑞珍等（譯），布魯納教育論著選（頁420-431）。人民教育出版社。（原著出版於1964年）
【Bruner, J. (2018). Some theorems on instruction. In R.-Z. Shao et al. (Trans.), Bruner’s selected educational works (pp. 420-431). People’s Education Press. (Original work published 1964)】
Descartes, R.（1986）。第一哲學沉思集（龐景仁，譯）。商務印書館。（原著出版於1641年）
【Descartes, R. (1986). Meditations on first philosophy (J.-R. Pang, Trans.). The Commercial Press. (Original work published 1641)】
Dennett, D. C.（2008）。意識的解釋（蘇德超，譯）。北京理工大學出版社。（原著出版於1991年）
【Dennett, D. C. (2008). Consciousness explained (D.-C. Su, Trans.). Beijing Institute of Technology Press. (Original work published 1991)】
Dewey, J.（1990）。民主主義與教育（王承緒，譯）。人民教育。（原著出版於1916年）
【Dewey, J. (1990). Democracy and education (C.-X. Wang, Trans.). People’s Education. (Original work published 1916)】
Leahey, T. H.（2013）。心理學史：心理學思想的主要流派（蔣柯等，譯）。中國輕工業。（原著出版於2001年）
【Leahey, T. H. (2013). A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought (K. Jiang et al., Trans.). China Light Industry Press. (Original work published 2001)】
Locke, J.（1959）。人類理解論（關文運，譯）。商務印書館。（原著出版於1689年）
【Locke, J. (1959). An essay concerning human understanding (W.-Y. Guan, Trans.). The Commercial Press. (Original work published 1689)】
Olson, D. R.（2017）。傑羅姆．布魯納（袁錫江、李慧明，譯）。黑龍江教育。（原著出版於2007年）
【Olson, D. R. (2017). Jerome Bruner (X.-J. Yuan & H.-M. Li, Trans.). Heilongjiang Education Press. (Original work published 2007)】
Piaget, J.（2015）。智力心理學（嚴和來、姜餘，譯）。商務印書館。（原著出版於1947年）
【Piaget, J. (2015). The psychology of intelligence (H.-L. Yan & Y. Jiang, Trans.). The Commercial Press. (Original work published 1947)】
Piaget, J.（2015）。皮亞傑教育論著選（第二版）（盧濬，譯）。人民教育。（原著出版於1968年）
【Piaget, J. (2015). Selected educational works of Piaget (2nd ed., J. Lu, Trans.). People’s Education Press. (Original work published 1968)】
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R.（2005）。心裡發生和科學史（姜志輝，譯）。華東師範大學出版社。（原著出版於1983年）
【Piaget, J., & García, R. (2005). Psychogenesis and the history of science (Z.-H. Jiang, Trans.). East China Normal University Press. (Original work published 1983)】
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R.（2005）。走向一種意義的邏輯（李其緯，譯）。華東師範大學出版社。（原著出版於1987年）
【Piaget, J., & García, R. (2005). Toward a logic of meanings (Q.-W. Li, Trans.). East China Normal University Press. (Original work published 1987)】
Popper, K.（1987）。客觀知識：一個進化論的研究（舒煒光等人，譯）。上海譯文（原著出版於1972年）
【Popper, K. (1987). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach (W.-G. Shu et al., Trans.). Shanghai Translation. (Original work published 1972)】
Vygotsky, L.（2004）。維果茨基教育論著選（余震球，譯）。人民教育。（原著出版於1934年）
【Vygotsky, L. (2004). Selected educational works of Vygotsky (Z.-Q. Yu, Trans.). People’s Education Press. (Original work published 1934)】
White, L. A.（1988）。文化的科學：人類與文明研究（沈約等人，譯）。山東人民。（原著出版於1949年）
【White, L. A. (1988). The science of culture: A study of man and civilization (Y. Shen et al., Trans.). Shandong People’s House. (Original work published 1949)】
二、外文文獻
Bruner, J. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044160
Bruner, J. (1983). In search of mind: Essays in autobiography. Harper & Row.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (2001). In response. In D. Bakhurst & S. Shanker (Eds.), Jerome Bruner: Language, culture and self (pp. 199-215). Sage.
Bruner, J. (2004). A short history of psychological theories of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Educational psychology: A century of contributions (pp. 3-15). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bruner, J., Olver, R. R., & Greenfield, P. M. (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. Wiley.
De Lisi, R. (1983). Relation to Piagetian theory. In E. K. Scholnick (Ed.), New trends in conceptual representation: Challenges to Piaget’s theory? (pp. 229-235). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gardner, H. (2017). Jerome Seymour Bruner: 1 October 1915– 5 June 2016. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 161(4), 353-361.
Geertz, C. (2000). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton University Press.
Gibbons, A. (2011). An interview with Jerome Bruner. Aelia Media. https://aeliamedia.wordpress. com/2011/06/23/an-interview-with-jerome-bruner.
Greenfield, P. (1990). Jerome Bruner: The Harvard years. Human Development, 33(6), 327-333. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276532
Greenfield, P. (2016). Jerome Bruner (1915-2016). Nature, 535(7611), 232. https://doi.org/10.1038/ 535232a
Kay, A. (1990). The machine that changed the world: Interview with Alan Kay. GBH Archives. https://americanarchive.org/catalog/cpb-aacip-15-pv6b27q16d
Kerr, B. (2008). Alan Kay: After 40 years the Dynabook is not here yet. Blogspot. https://billkerr2. blogspot.com/2008/12/alan-kay-after-40-years-dynabook-is-not.html
Lutkehaus, N. C. (2008). Putting “culture” into cultural psychology: Anthropology’s role in the development of Bruner’s cultural psychology. Ethos, 36(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1548-1352.2008.00003.x
Palmer, J. A., Cooper, D. E., & Bresler, L. (2001). Fifty modern thinkers on education: From Piaget to the present. Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1999). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hodgson, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1951)
Shore, B. (1997). Keeping the conversation going: An interview with Jerome Bruner. Ethos, 25(1), 7-62. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1997.25.1.7
Washburn, S. L., & Howell, F. C. (1960). Human evolution and culture. In S. Tax (Ed.), The evolution of man (pp. 33-57). University of Chicago Press.