(Special Issue) From the Study of Man to the Education of Man: The Educational Significance and Implications of Bruner’s MACOS Curriculum
Author: Enhui Yang (Yancheng Kindergarten Teacher College), Yuanxue Zhu (College of Education, National Chengchi University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 71, No. 1
Date：March 2026
Pages：37-66
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202603_71(1).0002
Abstract：
This study undertakes an in-depth examination of “Man: A Course of Study” (MACOS), a curriculum developed under the leadership of contemporary educational thinker Jerome Bruner, systematically investigating its core educational philosophy, curriculum structure, pedagogical practices, and profound implications for contemporary educational reform. As an exemplary curriculum of the 1960s “New Social Studies Movement” in the United States, MACOS was grounded in structuralist cognitive theory and creatively integrated multidisciplinary knowledge from anthropology, psychology, and evolutionary biology, with the aim of guiding students in social science learning centered on “the exploration of human nature.”
Research Background and Motivation
While Bruner’s contributions to educational theory and practice are widely recognized, systematic scholarly research on MACOS remains inadequate. Existing literature tends either to emphasize historical background descriptions or to focus on technical analyses of curriculum models, without deeply examining how MACOS systematically transformed theoretical research on “humanity” into human-centered educational practice. Notably, there is insufficient exploration of how MACOS, based on the study of “humanity,” systematically constructed the holistic operational logic integrating curriculum objectives, content, methods, and evaluation. This research gap underscores the necessity of re-examining MACOS to comprehensively present its integrated framework connecting educational philosophy, curriculum design, and pedagogical practice.
Research Objectives
This study aims to systematically elucidate how MACOS promotes children’s cognitive development, cultural understanding, and ethical reasoning through its interdisciplinary curriculum content, spiral curriculum organization, and discovery learning pedagogical strategies. Concurrently, this study seeks to critically reflect– within its historical context– on the internal and external challenges and structural limitations that MACOS encountered during implementation, thereby extracting its significant implications for contemporary educational innovation in the digital era.
Literature Review
A review of relevant literature reveals that previous research has predominantly approached MACOS from the perspectives of curriculum development history or Bruner’s personal academic trajectory, with limited attention to the curriculum philosophy centered on “human nature inquiry” and its epistemological foundations. While some scholars have astutely identified its scientific inquiry characteristics, they have relatively underemphasized Bruner’s core commitment to humanistic values. Other researchers have focused on comparisons with objectives-based models, yet discussions of MACOS’s pioneering contributions to multicultural education and values education remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, MACOS’s innovative approach to instructional technology– positioning films, games, and other media as “prisms” for cultural understanding and “scaffolding” for cognitive development– this pedagogically sophisticated technological perspective has not received adequate scholarly attention and evaluation.
Research Methods
To achieve the research objectives, this study employs a combined approach of historical analysis and document analysis. Historical analysis traces the development of MACOS within the evolving social, cultural, and educational landscape of the United States from the 1950s to 1970s, while examining Bruner’s intellectual biography to understand both the external conditions and internal logic shaping his curriculum philosophy. Document analysis involves in-depth interpretation of Bruner’s original writings, the MACOS curriculum materials, and significant critical literature. Through interpretation and synthesis of qualitative data, the study extracts core educational meanings and conducts critical reflection.
Research Findings
The principal findings of this study are as follows:
(1) A curriculum framework centered on human nature inquiry: MACOS constructed a curriculum guiding students toward a comprehensive understanding of the human condition, structured around three core questions: “What is human nature?”, “How is human nature formed?”, and “How can humans develop their humanity more fully?” The content transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries in history and geography. Through comparative studies of salmon, herring gulls, baboons, and Inuit Eskimos, students explore the essence of humanity through the interplay of biological and cultural dimensions.
(2) Discovery learning and technology as cognitive scaffolding: Pedagogically, MACOS emphasizes “discovery learning,” guiding students to construct knowledge autonomously through strategies including comparison, inference, participation, and metacognitive activation. Particularly noteworthy is its forward-thinking application of instructional technology: films, games, and other media function not merely as vehicles for knowledge transmission, but as “prisms” for stimulating cultural reflection and “scaffolding” for supporting cognitive construction, thereby pioneering a distinctive paradigm for deeply integrating technology into humanistic education.
(3) Empirically validated teaching and learning outcomes: Multiple empirical studies demonstrate that MACOS implementation effectively promotes teacher pedagogical reflection, fostering shifts toward more student-centered teaching approaches and encouraging adoption of diverse assessment methods. For students, MACOS not only enhances learning motivation and positive attitudes toward social studies, but also cultivates cross-cultural understanding and critical thinking skills, with demonstrable positive effects in reducing achievement gaps among students from diverse backgrounds.
(4) Underlying causes of curriculum termination and sociological implications: MACOS ultimately ceased due to external political and cultural conflicts, prohibitively high implementation costs, and lack of vertical articulation with schools’ overall curriculum systems. This outcome profoundly illustrates that educational reform success depends not solely on curriculum design quality, but is inextricably linked to social and cultural contexts, political ideologies, and institutional structures. From an educational sociology perspective, the trajectory of MACOS exemplifies the nature of curriculum as a “cultural politics” text, wherein content selection and organization inevitably engage with contestations over values and power.
Discussion and Implications
Despite MACOS’s incomplete realization due to historical constraints, the educational philosophy it embodied and the curriculum model it pioneered retain profound relevance for contemporary educational contexts confronting digital transformation and value pluralism. In summary, its implications encompass:
(1) Re-examining educational essence: Education must refocus on “human development,” transcending mere knowledge transmission and skills training to prioritize holistic human flourishing.
(2) Advancing knowledge integration: Through interdisciplinary integration and structural understanding, educators should help students construct coherent worldviews to counter knowledge fragmentation.
(3) Upholding value commitments: Curricula should cultivate students’ multicultural perspectives and critical capacity for value judgment, preventing reproduction of cultural hegemony.
(4) Innovating pedagogical approaches: In the technological age, technology should serve as a medium for deepening humanistic inquiry and scaffolding cognitive development, rather than constituting an educational end in itself.
(5) Building collaborative infrastructures: Educational innovation must acknowledge schools as social systems and establish collaborative ecosystems supporting teacher professional development and effective curriculum implementation.
The historical experience of MACOS reminds us that meaningful educational transformation requires seeking dynamic and dialectical equilibrium among theoretical construction and classroom practice, educational ideals and social realities, technological affordances and humanistic foundations, and individual development and social structures.
Keywords：Bruner, Man: A Course of Study (MACOS), social studies curriculum, education reform, cognitive theory
《Full Text》
References：巴戰龍（2017）。布魯納和「人類：一門研究課程」。中國民族教育，12，16。https://doi. org/10.16855/j.cnki.zgmzjy.2017.12.011
【Ba, Z.-L. (2017). Bruner and “Man: A Course of Study”. China’s Ethnic Education, 12, 16. https://doi.org/ 10.16855/j.cnki.zgmzjy.2017.12.011】
汪霞（2000）。國外中小學課程演進。山東教育。
【Wang, X. (2000). The evolution of primary and secondary school curriculum abroad. Shandong Education Press.】
沈曉敏（2003）。社會課程與教學論。浙江教育。
【Shen, X.-M. (2003). Social curriculum and teaching theory. Zhejiang Education.】
徐珊珊（2012）。初等學校社會科課程革新─傑洛姆‧布魯納主持《人類研究課程》的個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中央民族大學。
【Xu, S.-S.(2012). Social studies curriculum reform in elementary schools: A case study of Man: A course of study directed by Jerome Bruner [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Minzu University of China.】
常永才、李英源、謝丹、徐珊珊（2016）。科學取向的社會科課程革新：布魯納主持《人類研究課程》分析。教育學術月刊，05，88-96。https://doi.org/10.16477/j.cnki.issn1674-2311.2016. 05.013
【Chang, Y.-C., Li, Y.-Y., Xie, D., & Xu, S.-S. (2016). Science-oriented reform of social studies curriculum: Analysis of Bruner’s Man: A course of study. Education Research Monthly, 05, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.16477/j.cnki. issn1674-2311.2016.05.013】
» More
一、中文文獻
巴戰龍（2017）。布魯納和「人類：一門研究課程」。中國民族教育，12，16。https://doi. org/10.16855/j.cnki.zgmzjy.2017.12.011
【Ba, Z.-L. (2017). Bruner and “Man: A Course of Study”. China’s Ethnic Education, 12, 16. https://doi.org/ 10.16855/j.cnki.zgmzjy.2017.12.011】
汪霞（2000）。國外中小學課程演進。山東教育。
【Wang, X. (2000). The evolution of primary and secondary school curriculum abroad. Shandong Education Press.】
沈曉敏（2003）。社會課程與教學論。浙江教育。
【Shen, X.-M. (2003). Social curriculum and teaching theory. Zhejiang Education.】
徐珊珊（2012）。初等學校社會科課程革新─傑洛姆‧布魯納主持《人類研究課程》的個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中央民族大學。
【Xu, S.-S.(2012). Social studies curriculum reform in elementary schools: A case study of Man: A course of study directed by Jerome Bruner [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Minzu University of China.】
常永才、李英源、謝丹、徐珊珊（2016）。科學取向的社會科課程革新：布魯納主持《人類研究課程》分析。教育學術月刊，05，88-96。https://doi.org/10.16477/j.cnki.issn1674-2311.2016. 05.013
【Chang, Y.-C., Li, Y.-Y., Xie, D., & Xu, S.-S. (2016). Science-oriented reform of social studies curriculum: Analysis of Bruner’s Man: A course of study. Education Research Monthly, 05, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.16477/j.cnki. issn1674-2311.2016.05.013】
張晶晶（2021）。MACOS：一門課程的誕生與終結。今日教育，03，70-75。
【Zhang, J.-J. (2021). MACOS: The birth and end of a course. Education Today, 03, 70-75.】
符碧真、李冠穎（2023）。面對108新課綱的「探究與實作」：師資培育「雙實作」的教育實踐課程。教育科學研究期刊，68（3），239-273。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_ 68(3).0008
【Fwu, B.-J., & Li, G.-Y. (2023). Responding to “inquiry and practice” in the 2019 curriculum guidelines: A dual-practice approach to a teaching practice course in teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 68(3), 239-273. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0008】
單文經（2005）。Rugg及Bruner社會領域課程改革經驗的啟示。教育研究集刊，51（1），1-30。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200503_(51-1).0001
【Shan, W.-J. (2005). Learning from Rugg’s and Bruner’s curriculum reforms in social studies. Bulletin of Educational Research, 51(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200503_(51-1).0001】
單文經（2020）。作為美國新社會科課改要項的結構與發現二辭之意涵評析。課程與教學，23（2），153-183。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202004_23(2).0007
【Shan, W.-J. (2020). A critical analysis of the significance of structure and discovery as main items for curriculum reform of new social studies in the United States. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(2), 153-183. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202004_23(2).0007】
單文經、蔣美霞（2024）。綜述Bruner等人執行的兩項鷹架研究並探討其教學意涵。教育科學研究期刊，69（3），225-256。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0008
【Shan, W.-J., & Jiang, M.-X. (2024). An overview of two studies on scaffolding in learning conducted by Bruner et al. and an exploration of their pedagogical implications. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 69(3), 225-256. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0008】
程鋼（2005）。從《教育過程》到《教育文化》─布魯納教育文化觀述評。中國大學教學，5，21-24。
【Cheng, K. (2005). From the process of education to the culture of education: A review of Bruner’s cultural view on education. China University Teaching, 5, 21-24.】
廬珊（2010）。美國小學「新社會科運動」之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。上海師範大學。
【Lu, S. (2010). A study of the “new social studies movement” in American elementary schools [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Shanghai Normal University.】
鍾鴻銘（2023）。MACOS課程方案發展始末及其歷史意義。課程研究，18（1），45-62。https://doi.org/10.53106/181653382023031801003
【Jong, H.-M. (2023). The development of MACOS curriculum project and its historical significance. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.53106/181653382023031801003】
鍾鴻銘（2025）。MACOS課程爭議事件探究。當代教育研究季刊，33（1），5-36。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202503_33(1).0001
【Jong, H.-M. (2025). An inquiry into the controversy caused by MACOS. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 33(1), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202503_33(1).0001】
二、外文文獻
Brown, J. (1988). “A is for atom, B is for bomb”: Civil defense in American public education, 1948-1963. The Journal of American History, 75(1), 68-90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1889655. https://doi.org/10.2307/1889655
Bruner, J. S. (1960) . The process of education. Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1965). Man: A course of study (ED178390). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED178390.pdf.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University.
Bruner, J. S. (1971). The relevance of education. W. W. Norton.
Bruner, J. S. (1983). In search of mind: Essays in autobiography. Harper & Row.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (2006). In search of pedagogy: Vol. I. The selected works of Jerome S. Bruner, 1957-1978. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088609
Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1949.tb01241.x
Cort, H. R., Jr., & Peskowitz, N. (1977a). A longitudinal study of “Man: A course of study”: Vol. 3. Interviews (ED151278). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED151278.pdf
Cort, H. R., Jr., & Peskowitz, N. (1977b). A longitudinal study of “Man: A course of study”: Vol. 2. Quantitative results. summary report (ED151275). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED151275.pdf
Cort, H. R., Jr., Henderson, N. H., & Jones, C. (1971). Approaches to further evaluation of “Man: A course of study” (ED178416). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED178416.pdf
Curriculum Development Associates. (1971). Man: A course of study (MACOS) [Brochure].
Crosby, S. G. (1972). Man: A course of study: Program report (ED071984). ERIC. https://files. eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED071984.pdf
Debolt, S. (1972). A study of “Man: A course of study” in the metropolitan school district, Nashville, Tennessee (ED092448). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED092448.pdf
Dow, P. B. (1975). MACOS: The study of human behavior as one road to survival. The Phi Delta Kappan, 57(2), 79-81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20298151
Dow, P. B. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Harvard University. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674330344
Fitchett, P. G., & Russell, W. B. (2012). Reflecting on MACOS: Why it failed and what we can learn from its demise. Paedagogica Historica, 48(3), 469-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00309230.2011.554423
Fraser, L. A. (1975). Effect of “Man: A course of study” on urban students’ self concept as learners (ED120030). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED120030.pdf
Goodson, I. (1993). School subjects and curriculum change: Studies in curriculum history. The Falmer Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2007.38.2.195
Johnson, C. S. (2010). Making sense of it all: A research synthesis on the impact of “Man: A course of study”. In B. S. Stern (Ed.), The new social studies: People, projects, and perspectives (pp. 231-260). Information Age.
Lutkehaus, N. C. (2008). Putting “culture” into cultural psychology: Anthropology’s role in the development of Bruner’s cultural psychology. Ethos, 36(1), 46-59. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/20486560
Mazuzan, G. T. (1992). “Good science gets funded”: The historical evolution of grant making at the national science foundation. Science Communication, 14(1), 63-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 107554709201400104
Olsen, D. R. (2007). Jerome Bruner. Bloomsbury.
Peckham, P. D., & Ware, A. E. (1973). An evaluation of “Man: A course of study” (ED081662). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED081662.pdf
Schaffarzick, J., & Sykes, G. (1979). Values conflicts and curriculum issues: Lessons from research and experience. McCutchan.
Shermis, S. S., & Barth, J. L. (1978). We all know what a problem is. Don’t we. Peabody Journal of Education, 55(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01619567809538199
Smidt, S. (2011). Introducing Bruner: A guide for practitioners and students in early years education. Routledge.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good. https://doi.org/10.54675/MDZL5552
Wolcott, H. F. (2007). The middlemen of MACOS. Council on Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(2), 195-206.
Young, M. (2006). Curriculum studies and the problem of knowledge: Updating the enlightenment? In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J.-A. Dillabough, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization & social change (pp. 734-744). Oxford University.