(Special Issue) Exploration of Social and Emotional Learning Programs and Intervention for Students With Special Education Needs
Author: Qian-Yun Chen (Department of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Huei-Mei Liu (Department of Special Education / Social Emotional Education and Development Center, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 70, No. 3
Date:September 2025
Pages:63-97
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202509_70(3).0003
Abstract:
Research Background
Social and emotional competence is not only crucial for students’ performance in school, but its impact can also extend well into adulthood. Therefore, schools need to promote the development of students’ social-emotional skills. Schools must place greater emphasis on cultivating these abilities in students receiving special education services.
Special education students include those with disabilities, those who are gifted, as well as twice-exceptional students-those who possess both disabilities and giftedness. For students with various types of disabilities, social and emotional competence is often an area of weakness. Although some literature argues that gifted students do not have disadvantages in social emotional abilities, other literature argues that gifted students may have poor social emotional abilities in certain situations. Similarly, twice-exceptional students also have a clear need for support in developing social and emotional competence.
Schools can enhance students' social and emotional competence through Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) programs. SEL refers to the process through which children, adolescents, and adults acquire and apply the knowledge and skills necessary to understand and manage emotions, set and achieve goals, empathize with others, build positive relationships, and make responsible decisions. It has become a globally recognized and emphasized educational priority. However, SEL-related research on special education students was relatively scarce.
Research Purpose
This paper aims to review and discuss relevant literature from several perspectives: the relationship between SEL and students in special education, the implementation methods of SEL programs, the effects of SEL programs on special education students, and the current status of SEL programs centered on special education students. Through this review, the paper seeks to highlight the relevance of SEL to special education and to explore in greater depth the importance and application of SEL programs within the field of special education.
Methods
This study aims to review SEL programs in special education through literature analysis and discussion, highlighting their relevance and examining their importance and applications in the field.
Results and Discussions
1. The Relationship Between SEL and Students in Special Education
In general, SEL emphasizes the acquisition of social and emotional skills within a safe and supportive environment. These core competencies include self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. Students with disabilities and twice-exceptional students often require more intensive support across all five of these domains. Although gifted students may not experience difficulties in every area, targeted interventions addressing each of these SEL competencies can still be highly beneficial for them. It can be seen that the connotation of SEL is very important to special education students. Applying SEL programs to the field of special education should be of great benefit to special education students.
2. The Implementation Methods of SEL Programs
Most SEL programs focus on universal prevention, hoping to prevent behavioral problems by improving children’s social and emotional skills and preventing maladaptive and inappropriate behaviors. SEL programs should be designed to meet students’ varying needs by providing comprehensive and continuous services. Comprehensive and continuous SEL services are typically structured across three systemic tiers. Tier 1 targets all students, emphasizing the creation of supportive learning environments and the teaching of social and emotional skills. Tier 2 serves students who are considered at risk, offering more frequent or intensive, small-group interventions focused on social emotional skills. Tier 3 supports students who are already exhibiting behavioral problems, providing highly individualized and intensive interventions tailored to their specific needs.
One of the strategies commonly used in SEL programs is for teachers to teach students contextually and culturally appropriate social emotional skills through systematic instruction and help students complete imitation and practice so that they can apply social emotional skills in daily life. Another frequently used strategy focuses on fostering social and emotional development by creating safe and caring environments.
SEL is a multi-layered framework, and its implementation can encounter various challenges. Schools need to make reasonable adjustments based on the specific needs and feedback of implementers and students, which is the key to maintaining the quality of SEL programs.
3. The Effects of SEL Programs on Special Education Students
Students in special education can effectively enhance their social and emotional competence through SEL programs. The impact of SEL programs on students with disabilities mainly lies in behavioral performance, social relationship building, and academic performance. For gifted students, the effects of SEL interventions are mainly observed in emotional regulation, social relationship building, and academic performance. Although the areas of impact may vary slightly across different student populations, the benefits of SEL interventions are positive. As for twice-exceptional students, although existing research is relatively limited, it can still be found that integrating SEL into teaching can help them think positively and improve their confidence. Therefore, SEL program intervention has positive intervention benefits for special education students.
4. The Current Status of SEL Programs Centered on Special Education Students
Discussions on intervention programs and effectiveness designed with special education students as the core are relatively scarce, which deserves continued exploration in the future.
According to previous studies on SEL interventions for various categories of special education students reveals notable differences in research focus. Students with disabilities are often more likely to experience emotional difficulties; however, due to the lack of effective tools to measure their emotional states, it is challenging to examine the specific impact of SEL programs on their emotional well-being. Research on SEL interventions for gifted students is also relatively limited, with few studies exploring behavioral changes resulting from SEL implementation in this group. Moreover, there are great differences among different types of special education students, but there are few studies that conduct comprehensive and in-depth explorations into the SEL needs, implementation methods and intervention effects of a certain type of special education students, nor are there any studies that compare different types of special education students. Research focusing on the effects of SEL interventions for twice-exceptional students is even more limited. On the other hand, further research can be conducted to explore the impact of specific skills included in SEL on special education students to help teachers make curriculum adjustments.
Summary
In the field of special education in Taiwan, although there have been practices and studies that align with SEL implementation strategies, there is still a lack of systematic approaches, and empirical research in this area remains underdeveloped. SEL programs not only align with the concepts of Taiwan’s existing special needs curricula but also offer complementary effects to address gaps in these programs. However, this requires more research to understand how to effectively implement SEL programs within the special education field and assess their impact. Additionally, sufficient teacher training programs are needed to help both special education and general education teachers use SEL programs to support special education students.
Future suggestions
It is suggested that future research will be more systematic in exploring the impact of SEL programs on special education students and in determining how SEL can be effectively applied within the field of special education.
Keywords:disability, gifted and talented, social and emotional learning, special education
《Full Text》
References:Mackey, A. L., & Ragan, M.(2024)。社會情緒學習教室:理解與培育學生的新途徑(吳怡萱、歐思賢、蘇吉禾、姚惠馨、謝佳真、洪儷瑜、呂俐葶譯)。心理。(原著出版於2022年)
【Mackey, A. L., & Ragan, M. (2024). The social emotional classroom: A new way to nurture students and understand the brain (Y.-H. Wu, S.-H. Ou, J.-H. Su, H.-H. Yao, J.-Z. Xie, L.-Y. Hung & L.-T. Lu, Trans.). Psychological. (Original work published 2022)】
王昕瑀(2023)。社會情緒學習課程對國小一般學童社會情緒學習、情緒能力及其對自閉症兒童接納態度之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
【Wang, H.-Y. (2023). The effect of social and emotional learning program on elementary school students' social-emotional learning, emotional competence, and attitude of acceptance to children with autism spectrum disorder [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
江洔墻(2024)。COVID-19疫情對幼兒社會情緒發展研究趨勢影響之知識圖譜分析。教育科學研究期刊,69(2),1-41。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0001
【Chiang, C.-C. (2024). Knowledge mapping of the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on trends in research regarding early childhood social-emotional development. Journal of Research in Education Science, 69(2), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0001】
吳怡萱(2021)。評介《促進幼兒的幸福感:研究、應用和策略》。當代教育研究季刊,29(4),119-126。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202112_29(4).0004
【Wu, Y.-H. (2021). Review of “Promoting well-being in the pre-school years: Research, applications and strategies”. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 29(4), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202112_29(4). 0004】
吳佳蒨、鈕文英(2012)。社交技巧訓練對高功能自閉症及亞斯柏格症者介入成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊,37(2),29-57。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE201207.3702002
【Wu, C.-C., & Niew, W.-I. (2012). A meta-analysis of social skills intervention for individuals with high-functioning autism and asperger syndrome. Bulletin of Special Education, 37(2), 29-57. https://doi.org/10.6172/ BSE201207.3702002】
» More
一、中文文獻
Mackey, A. L., & Ragan, M.(2024)。社會情緒學習教室:理解與培育學生的新途徑(吳怡萱、歐思賢、蘇吉禾、姚惠馨、謝佳真、洪儷瑜、呂俐葶譯)。心理。(原著出版於2022年)
【Mackey, A. L., & Ragan, M. (2024). The social emotional classroom: A new way to nurture students and understand the brain (Y.-H. Wu, S.-H. Ou, J.-H. Su, H.-H. Yao, J.-Z. Xie, L.-Y. Hung & L.-T. Lu, Trans.). Psychological. (Original work published 2022)】
王昕瑀(2023)。社會情緒學習課程對國小一般學童社會情緒學習、情緒能力及其對自閉症兒童接納態度之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
【Wang, H.-Y. (2023). The effect of social and emotional learning program on elementary school students' social-emotional learning, emotional competence, and attitude of acceptance to children with autism spectrum disorder [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
江洔墻(2024)。COVID-19疫情對幼兒社會情緒發展研究趨勢影響之知識圖譜分析。教育科學研究期刊,69(2),1-41。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0001
【Chiang, C.-C. (2024). Knowledge mapping of the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on trends in research regarding early childhood social-emotional development. Journal of Research in Education Science, 69(2), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202406_69(2).0001】
吳怡萱(2021)。評介《促進幼兒的幸福感:研究、應用和策略》。當代教育研究季刊,29(4),119-126。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202112_29(4).0004
【Wu, Y.-H. (2021). Review of “Promoting well-being in the pre-school years: Research, applications and strategies”. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 29(4), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202112_29(4). 0004】
吳佳蒨、鈕文英(2012)。社交技巧訓練對高功能自閉症及亞斯柏格症者介入成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊,37(2),29-57。https://doi.org/10.6172/BSE201207.3702002
【Wu, C.-C., & Niew, W.-I. (2012). A meta-analysis of social skills intervention for individuals with high-functioning autism and asperger syndrome. Bulletin of Special Education, 37(2), 29-57. https://doi.org/10.6172/ BSE201207.3702002】
吳維民(2021)。特殊教育領域運用自我決策之探討。特殊教育發展期刊,72,67-85。https://doi.org/10.7034/DSE.202112_(72).0005
【Wu, W.-M. (2021). A probe into the application of self-determination in special education. The Development of Special Education, 72, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.7034/DSE.202112_(72).0005】
林秀玲(2022)。社會情緒學習在臺灣推動現況暨其對兒童社會情緒學習、學習動機、主觀幸福感影響之研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。
【Lin, H.-L. (2022). The current situation of social emotional learning in Taiwan and its influence on children’s social emotional behavior, learning motivation, and subjective well-being [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
卓苡絨(2024)。運用遊戲化教學進行社會情緒學習課程對特殊生影響之研究(NSTC 112-2813-C-003-042-H)。國家科學及技術委員會。
【Zhuo, Y.-R. (2024). A study on the impact of gamification-based social emotional learning courses on special students (NSTC 112-2813-C-003-042-H). National Science and Technology Council.】
社會情緒教育與發展研究中心(2024)。社會情緒教育與發展研究中心介紹。https://seedcenter.tw/ about/center/
【Social Emotional Education and Development Center. (2024). Introduction to the Center for Social Emotional Education and Development. https://seedcenter.tw/about/center/】
洪欣妤、潘裕豐(2022)。國小資優生道德認知對新冠疫情病患態度之現況與其關聯:以對新冠疫情之情緒為調節變項。教育科學研究期刊,67(4),143-175。https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202212_67(4).0005
【Hung, S.-Y., & Pan, Y.-F. (2022). Effects of the moral cognition of gifted elementary school students on their attitudes toward COVID-19: Exploring the moderating effects of emotions. Journal of Research in Education Science, 67(4), 143-175. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0005】
洪儷瑜、陳佩玉(2018)。從兩個三角形談臺灣推動正向行為支持的發展。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,2018,121-139。
【Hung, L.-Y. & Chen, P.-Y. (2018). Discussing the development of positive behavior support in Taiwan from the perspective of two triangles. Annual Journal of Special Education, 2018, 121-139.】
教育部(2021a)。十二年國民基本教育身心障礙相關之特殊需求領域課程綱要。國家教育研究院。https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52
【Ministry of Education. (2021a). The curriculum outline for the special needs field of the 12-year basic education for people with disabilities. National Academy for Educational Research. https://www.naer.edu.tw/ PageSyllabus?fid=52】
教育部(2021b)。十二年國民基本教育資賦優異相關之特殊需求領域課程綱要。國家教育研究院。https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52
【Ministry of Education. (2021b). The curriculum outline for special needs areas related to gifted and talented students in the 12-year national basic education. National Academy for Educational Research. https://www.naer.edu.tw/PageSyllabus?fid=52】
教育部(2023)。特殊教育法。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/ LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080027
【Ministry of Education. (2023). The Special Education Act. Laws & Regulations Database of The Republic of China (Taiwan). https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0080027】
教育部(2024a)。一一二年度特殊教育統計年報。教育部特殊教育通報網。https:// www.set.edu.tw/actclass/fileshare/default.asp
【Ministry of Education. (2024a). Annual special education statistical report for 2024. Special Education Transmit Net. https://www.set.edu.tw/actclass/fileshare/default.asp】
教育部(2024b)。學生輔導法。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0070058
【Ministry of Education. (2024b). Student Counseling Act. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode= H0070058】
教育部(2025)。教育部社會情緒學習中長程計畫第一期五年計畫(114-118年)。https:// cfte.site.nthu.edu.tw/var/file/275/1275/img/127742991.pdf
【Ministry of Education. (2025). Ministry of education’s social emotional learning medium- and long-term plan, phase 1, five-year plan (2025-2029). https://cfte.site.nthu.edu.tw/var/file/275/1275/img/127742991.pdf】
郭靜姿(2000)。談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊,75,1-6。
【Kuo, C.-C. (2000). On the special adaptation problems and guidance of gifted students. Gifted Education Journal, 75, 1-6.】
張映芬(2021)。國中生完美主義組型暨其與父母期望/苛責、學業情緒、動機涉入之關係。教育科學研究期刊,66(1),203-230。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007
【Chang, Y.-F. (2021). Perfectionism profiles and their relationship with parental expectations/criticism, achievement emotions, and motivational engagement. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(1), 203-230. https:// doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007】
張學善(2004)。情緒管理課程對提昇教育學程學生情緒智慧之成效研究。彰化師大輔導學報,26(2),37-56。https://doi.org/10.7040/GJ.200412.0037
【Chang, H.-S. (2004). Effects of emotional management program on the future teacher’s emotional intelligence. Guidance Journal, 26(2), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.7040/GJ.200412.0037】
游心慈、陳慧娟(2022)。成為青少年社會情緒學習的楷模:後疫情時代親師合作的新視角。中等教育,73(1),51-70。https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.202203_73(1).0004
【Yu, H.-T., & Chen, H.-J. (2022). Becoming a role model for adolescents’ social and emotional learning: A new perspective of parent-teacher cooperation in the post-pandemic era. Secondary Education, 73(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.6249/SE.202203_73(1).0004】
黃絢質(2024)。雙語教學融入國中綜合活動領域的社會情緒學習。臺灣教育評論月刊,13(5),181-206。
【Huang, H.-C. (2024). Social and emotional learning with bilingual teaching embedded in the integrative activities area in Junior High Schools. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 13(5), 181-206.】
曾瓊禛、洪儷瑜(2015)。學習障礙學生社會情緒適應困難內涵初探。特殊教育季刊,137,9-19。https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.2015.137.9-19
【Tseng, C.-C. & Hung, L.-Y. (2015). Exploring difficulties of students with learning disabilities in social and emotional adjustment. Special Education Quarterly, 137, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.6217/SEQ.2015.137.9-19】
蔡幸彤(2023)。融合教育於特殊教育行政之創新策略與實踐。學生事務與輔導,62(2),68-75。https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.202309_62(2).0007
【Tsai, X.-T. (2023). Innovative strategies and practice for inclusive education in special education administration. Student Affairs and Guidance Counseling, 62(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.6506/SAGC.202309_62(2).0007】
蔡明富、陳勇祥(2021)。以教師視角敘說數理型雙重殊異學生之輔導歷程。資優教育論壇,19(2),98-115。
【Tsai, M.-F., & Chen, Y.-H. (2021). Narrating the tutoring process of twice-exceptional students in mathematics and physics field from the perspective of teachers. Forum of Gifted Education, 19(2), 98-115.】
二、外文文獻
Alsalamah, A. A. (2023). Special education teacher’s self-efficacy in implementing social-emotional learning to support students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12318
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5™ (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books. 9780890425596
Bailey, R., Stickle, L., Brion-Meisels, G., & Jones, S. M. (2019). Re-imagining social-emotional learning: Findings from a strategy-based approach. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(5), 53-58. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0031721719827549
Bates-Krakoff, J., McGrath, R. E., Graves, K., & Ochs, L. (2017). Beyond a deficit model of strengths training in schools: Teaching targeted strength use to gifted students. Gifted Education International, 33(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416646210
Baumeister, A. L., Storch, E. A., & Geffken, G. R. (2008). Peer victimization in children with learning disabilities. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 25, 11-23. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10560-007-0109-6
Berkowitz, M. W., & Hoppe, M. A. (2009). Character education and gifted children. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130903358493
Blake, J. J., Lund, E. M., Zhou, Q., Kwok, O., & Benz, M. R. (2012). National prevalence rates of bully victimization among students with disabilities in the United States. School Psychology Quarterly, 27, 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000008
Baird, G., Scott, W., Dearing, E., & Hamill, S. (2009). Cognitive self-regulation in youth with and without learning disabilities: Academic self-efficacy, theories of intelligence, learning versus performance goal preferences, and effort attributions. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 881-908. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2009.28.7.881
Bigby, C., Whiteside, M., & Douglas, J. (2019). Providing support for decision making to adults with intellectual disability: Perspectives of family members and workers in disability support services. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 44(4), 396-409. https://doi.org/ 10.3109/13668250.2017.1378873
Boyatzis, R. (2006). Using tipping points of emotional intelligence and cognitive competencies to predict financial performance of leaders. Psicothema, 18, 124-131.
Cavilla, D. (2019). Maximizing the potential of gifted learners through a developmental framework of affective curriculum. Gifted Education International, 35(2), 136-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0261429418824875
Cavioni, V., Grazzani, I., & Ornaghi, V. (2017). Social and emotional learning for children with learning disability: Implications for inclusion. International Journal of Emotional Education, 9(2), 100-109.
Cipriano, C., Strambler, M. J., Naples, L. H., Ha, C., Kirk, M., Wood, M., Sehgal, K., Zieher A. K., Eveleigh, A., McCathy, M., Funaro, M., Ponnock, A., Chow, J. C., & Durlak, J. (2023). The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta‐analysis of universal school‐based SEL interventions. Child development, 94(5), 1181-1204. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/cdev.13968
Citil, M., & Özkubat, U. (2020). The comparison of the social skills, problem behaviours and academic competence of gifted students and their non-gifted peers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(6), 296-312. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.280.18
Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard Educational Review, 76(2), 201-237. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.76.2.j44854x1524644vn
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. (2024). Fundamentals of SEL. https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/
Cunningham, C., & Glenn, S. (2004). Self‐awareness in young adults with Down syndrome: I. Awareness of down syndrome and disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 51(4), 335-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912042000295017
Daus, C. S., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). The case for the abilitybased model of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.321
DeRosier, M. E., & Mercer, S. H. (2009). Perceived behavioral atypicality as a predictor of social rejection and peer victimization: Implications for emotional adjustment and academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 375-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20382
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168. https:// doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Domitrovich, C. E., Durlak, J. A., Staley, K. C., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Social‐emotional competence: An essential factor for promoting positive adjustment and reducing risk in school children. Child Development, 88(2), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12739
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
Elias, M. J. (2004). The connection between social-emotional learning and learning disabilities: Implications for intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 53-63. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1593632
Elmi, C. (2020). Integrating social emotional learning strategies in higher education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 848-858. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ejihpe10030061
Elmore, R. F., & Zenus, V. (1994). Enhancing social‐emotional development of middle school gifted students. Roeper Review, 16(3), 182-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553569
Eren, F., Çete, A. Ö., Avcil, S., & Baykara, B. (2018). Emotional and behavioral characteristics of gifted children and their families. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 55(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/ 10.5152%2Fnpa.2017.12731
Espelage, D. L., Rose, C. A., & Polanin, J. R. (2015). Social-emotional learning program to reduce bullying, fighting, and victimization among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514564564
Espelage, D. L., Rose, C. A., & Polanin, J. R. (2016). Social-emotional learning program to promote prosocial and academic skills among middle school students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37(6), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515627475
Farmer, G. L., & Adams, D. (2021). Social-emotional competence among students with special needs: Relationship between foundational and applied SEL skills. American Journal of Educational Research, 9(7), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-9-7-3
Farmer, T. W., Lane, K. L., Lee, D. L., Hamm, J. V., & Lambert, K. (2012). The social functions of antisocial behavior: Considerations for school violence prevention strategies for students with disabilities. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874291203700303
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Hanebutt, R., Minotti, B., Cobb, N. A., & Peagram, K. (2024). Social-emotional learning and motivational interviews with middle school youth with disabilities or at-risk for disability identification. Education and Urban Society, 56(1), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00131245221110557
França-Freitas, M. L. P. D., Del Prette, A., & Del Prette, Z. A. P. (2014). Social skills of gifted and talented children. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 19, 288-295. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413- 294X2014000400006
Francis, R., Hawes, D. J., & Abbott, M. (2016). Intellectual giftedness and psychopathology in children and adolescents: A systematic literature review. Exceptional Children, 82(3), 279-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598779
Ghasemi, M. M., Seif, D., & Pirzadi, H. (2023). Predicting depression based on dimensions of social-emotional competence among gifted students. Research and Development in Medical Education, 12(1), 29-29. https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2023.33141
Greenberg, M. T. (2001). Relationships with teachers and bonds with school: Social emotional adjustment correlates for children with and without disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(200101)38:1<25::AID-PITS4>3.0.CO;2-C
Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., & Elias, M. J. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6-7), 466-474. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 811-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7
Hay, P. K., Gross, M. U., Hoekman, K., & Rogers, K. B. (2007). Prosocial reasoning and empathy in gifted children. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 16(2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.3316/ ielapa.797298560695748
Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2020). Social-emotional profile of children with and without learning disabilities: The relationships with perceived loneliness, self-efficacy and well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1-15. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph17207358
Hen, M., & Goroshit, M. (2014). Academic procrastination, emotional intelligence, academic self-efficacy, and GPA: A comparison between students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412439325
Hoffman, D. M. (2009). Reflecting on social emotional learning: A critical perspective on trends in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 533-556. https://doi.org/10.3102/ 0034654308325184
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(2), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x
Huggins, C. F., Donnan, G., Cameron, I. M., & Williams, J. H. (2020). A systematic review of how emotional self-awareness is defined and measured when comparing autistic and non-autistic groups. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 77, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020. 101612
Huggins, C. F., Donnan, G., Cameron, I. M., & Williams, J. H. (2021). Emotional self-awareness in autism: A meta-analysis of group differences and developmental effects. Autism, 25(2), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320964306
Hughes, R. B., Robinson-Whelen, S., Taylor, H. B., & Hall, J. W. (2006). Stress self-management: An intervention for women with physical disabilities. Women’s Health Issues, 16(6), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2006.08.003
Icka, E., & Gulevska, V. (2023). The relationship between giftedness and morality in school-age children. UBT Knowledge Center, 18-22. https://doi.org/10.3107/ubt-ic.2023.390
Ishak, N. M., Abidin, M. H. Z., & Bakar, A. Y. A. (2014). Dimensions of social skills and their relationship with empathy among gifted and talented students in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 750-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.292
King, E. W. (2005). Addressing the social and emotional needs of twice-exceptional students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 16-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503800103
Kurtoğlu, M. (2018). Determination of the relationship between emotional intelligence level and decision making strategies in gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2018.70
Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 799-823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
Little, L. (2002). Middle-class mothers’ perceptions of peer and sibling victimization among children with Asperger’s Syndrome and nonverbal learning disorders. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 25, 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/014608602753504847
Lubit, R., & Lubit, R. (2019). Why educators should care about social and emotional learning? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 160, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20362
Mahoney, J. L., Weissberg, R. P., Greenberg, M. T., Dusenbury, L., Jagers, R. J., Niemi, K., Schling er, M., Schlund, J., Shriver, T. P., Van Ausdal, K., & Yoder, N. (2021). Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1128-1142. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/amp0000701
McKenna, J. (2007). Emotional intelligence training in adjustment to physical disability and illness. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 14(12), 551-556. https://doi.org/10.12968/ ijtr.2007.14.12.27761
Michael, S. M. (2023). Teachers of gifted students’ descriptions of supporting gifted students’ social emotional learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Grand Canyon University.
Mooney, P., Ryan, J. B., Uhing, B. M., Reid, R., & Epstein, M. H. (2005). A review of self-management interventions targeting academic outcomes for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10864-005-6298-1
Neumeister, K. S. (2007). Perfectionism in gifted students: An overview of current research. Gifted Education International, 23(3), 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940702300306
Ogurlu, Ü., Sevgi-Yalın, H., & Yavuz-Birben, F. (2018). The relationship between social-emotional learning ability and perceived social support in gifted students. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416657221
Ozcan, D. (2017). Career decision-making of the gifted and talented. South African Journal of Education, 37(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n4a1521
Papadopoulos, D. (2020). Effects of a social-emotional learning-based program on self-esteem and self-perception of gifted kindergarten students: A pilot study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1275-1290. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.779438
Peterson, J. S. (2009). Myth 17: Gifted and talented individuals do not have unique social and emotional needs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 280-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0016986209346946
Peterson, J. S., & Lorimer, M. R. (2012). Small-group affective curriculum for gifted students: A longitudinal study of teacher facilitators. Roeper Review, 34, 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02783193.2012.686423
Peyre, H., Ramus, F., Melchior, M., Forhan, A., Heude, B., Gauvrit, N., & EDEN Mother-Child Cohort Study Group. (2016). Emotional, behavioral and social difficulties among high-IQ children during the preschool period: Results of the EDEN mother-child cohort. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 366-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.014
Plucker, J. A., Rinn, A. N., & Makel, M. C. (2017). From giftedness to gifted education: Reflecting theory in practice. Prufrock Press.
Rafatpanah, M., Seif, D., Khosravani, M., & Alborzi, S. (2016). Prediction of self-actualization based on personality traits and self-awareness among gifted students. Journal of Health Sciences & Surveillance System, 4(4), 174-180.
Reicher, H. (2010). Building inclusive education on social and emotional learning: Challenges and perspectives a review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(3), 213-246. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504218
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144
Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Johnson, R., Rohrbach, L.A., Simons-Rudolph, A., Vincus, A. & Thorne, J. (2003). Factors associated with fidelity to substance use prevention curriculum guides in the nation’s middle schools. Health Education & Behavior, 30(3), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1090198103030003010
Rinn, A. N. (2020). Social, emotional, and psychosocial development of gifted and talented individuals. Prufrock Press.
Rose, C. A., & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2012). Bullying and victimization among students with disabilities: Effective strategies for classroom teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48, 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211430119
Sabatino, C., & Wiebe, C. (2022). Comprehensive social emotional learning: Embedding skill development program-wide. In F. H. R. Piske, K. H. Collins, & K. B. Arnstein (Eds.), Critical issues in servicing twice exceptional students: Socially, emotionally, and culturally framing learning exceptionalities (pp. 137-151). Springer.
Sharabi, A., & Margalit, M. (2011). The mediating role of internet connection, virtual friends, and mood in predicting loneliness among students with and without learning disabilities in different educational environments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0022219409357080
Sklad, M., Diekstra, R., Ritter, M. D., Ben, J., & Gravesteijn, C. (2012). Effectiveness of school‐based universal social, emotional, and behavioral programs: Do they enhance students’ development in the area of skill, behavior, and adjustment? Psychology in the Schools, 49(9), 892-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21641
Skoog-Hoffman, A., Asher, A. M., Rista, C. P., Duncan, C. M., Andrew, S. T., Gabrielle, M., Melissa, K. D., Heather, L., Schwartz, M. K., Robert, J. J., Lakeisha, S., & Justina, S. (2024). Social and emotional learning in U.S. schools: Findings from CASEL’s nationwide policy scan and the American teacher panel and American school leader panel surveys. RAND Corporation.
Speirs, N. K. L., Williams, K. K., & Cross, T. L. (2009). Gifted high-school students’ perspectives on the development of perfectionism. Roeper Review, 31(4), 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02783190903177564
Spence, M., Ma, T. L., Nguyen, A., & Tseng, A. (2021). Project for the advancement of gifted and exceptional students: How are secondary teachers infusing SEL and executive functioning into instruction?. DADD Online Journal, 8(1), 93-106.
Swiatek, M. A. (2001). Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1005268704144
Sword, L. (2001). Psycho-social needs: Understanding the emotional, intellectual and social uniqueness of growing up gifted. http://www.darshana-ganatra.com/files/Psycho_social_Needs_ of_Gifted_Children_Kopie.pdf
Tasca, I., Guidi, M., Turriziani, P., Mento, G., & Tarantino, V. (2024). Behavioral and social-emotional disorders in intellectual giftedness: A systematic review. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 55(3), 768-789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01420-w
Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school‐based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta‐analysis of follow‐up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156-1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
Thomas, A. P., Bax, M. C., & Smyth, D. P. (1988). The social skill difficulties of young adults with physical disabilities. Child: Care, Health and Development, 14(4), 255-264. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1988.tb00579.x
Turner, L. D. (2018). Examining social emotional learning for gifted students [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Denver.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (Reproduced by Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, 2014). https://crpd.sfaa.gov.tw/BulletinCtrl?func= getBulletin&p=b_2&c=C&bulletinId=281
Van Deur, P. (2004). Gifted primary students’ knowledge of self directed learning. International Education Journal, 4(4), 64-74.
Vialle, W., Heaven, P. C. L., & Ciarrochi, J. V. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong youth study. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 13(6), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701786046
Wigelsworth, M., Lendrum, A., Oldfield, J., Scott, A., ten Bokkel, I., Tate, K., & Emery, C. (2020). The impact of trial stage, developer involvement and international transferability on universal social and emotional learning programme outcomes: A meta-analysis. In N. Humphrey, A. Lendrum, M. Wigelsworth, & M. Greenberg (Eds.), Social and emotional learning (pp. 73-102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429444692-6
Yudha, E. E. S., Yudha, E. S., & Ropipah, R. (2019). The socio-emotional competences: Reorientation of gifted education in the era of industrial revolution 4.0. In I. G. A. Lokita Purnamika Utami, A. Fauzi, & A. Mustofa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international conference on education and technology (ICET 2019) (pp. 509-513). Atlantis Press. https:// doi.org/10.2991/ICET-19.2019.129
Zins, J. E., & Elias, M. J. (2007). Social and emotional learning: Promoting the development of all students. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17(2-3), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410701413152