期刊目錄列表 - 70卷(2025) - 【教育科學研究期刊】70(2)六月刊

應用智慧型家教系統於國小學童閱讀策略教學之學習歷程研究
作者:
國家教育研究院/語文教育及編譯研究中心陳茹玲國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所曾厚強國立中正大學師資培育中心連啟舜國家教育研究院/語文教育及編譯研究中心蔡旻穎國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系宋曜廷

卷期:70卷第2期
日期:2025年6月
頁碼:195-233
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202506_70(2).0006

摘要:

  本研究以詞嵌入技術為基礎,建置提問對答形式之智慧型家教系統,以北北基國小的高、低閱讀能力計53位五年級學童為對象進行閱讀策略教學研究,透過分析兩組學生在策略運用、學習表現與學習歷程之差異,提供教學設計及學習輔導之具體建議。學習表現評估包括閱讀策略使用頻率與學科知識得分,學習歷程評估包括學習時間、學習路徑與認知組型。研究結果顯示:一、兩組學生均學會策略使用且學習表現進步,但運用之策略類型不同。學生後測知識得分均比前測高,高閱讀能力組在知識內容得分優於低閱讀能力組,顯示智慧型家教有助於提升學習表現。高閱讀能力組善用背景知識、組織策略,低閱讀能力組則多運用連結推論,兩組學生之理解監控策略均較不足。二、學生之學習歷程與認知組型各異,高閱讀能力者的學習路徑較短,需要較少輔助,低閱讀能力者多需明示或暗示的提示,且會忽略家教輔助學習的角色,在教學、教材及評量上提供適性與差異化之設計有其必要性。本研究透過智慧型家教陪伴學習者,讓教學和評量發揮更佳效果,並藉由分析不同閱讀能力者的學習歷程與策略運用之差異,提供更為適性化之閱讀教學建議。

關鍵詞:

自然語言處理、表徵學習、智慧型家教、詞嵌入、閱讀策略

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
柯華葳、詹益綾(2006)。國民小學(二至六年級)閱讀理解篩選測驗。教育部特殊教育小組。
【Ko, H.-W., & Zhan, Y.-L. (2006). Reading comprehension screening test for second to sixth graders. Department of Student Affairs and Special Education, Ministry of Education.】
陳茹玲、宋曜廷、蘇宜芬(2017)。「精緻化推論教學課程」對國小弱勢低年級學生策略運用、閱讀理解與故事重述表現之影響。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學報,48(3),303-327。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20150922
【Chen, J.-L., Sung, Y.-T., & Su, Y.-F. (2017). The effect of ‘elaboration curriculum’ on the reading strategy, reading comprehension and story retelling for 2nd grade students. The Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 48(3), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20150922
陳茹玲、陳柏琳、蘇宜芬、宋曜廷(2016)。「精緻化推論策略智慧型家教教學系統(Automated Reading Elaboration System, ARES)」之建置與教學研究(MOST 105-2511-S-656-004-)。國立臺東大學。
【Chen, J.-L., Chen, B., Su, Y.-F., & Sung, Y.-T. (2016). Using autotutor in strategic reading: The construction of automated reading elaboration system and effectiveness assessment (MOST 105-2511-S-656-004-). National Taitung University.】
陳麗安(2014)。國語文句型教學:AutoTutor介入模式(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。
【Chen, L.-A. (2014). Effectiveness of the sentence teaching: AutoTutor intervention model [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taichung University of Education.】
楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析。載於張春興、楊國樞、文崇一(主編),社會及行為科學研究法(下冊,頁809-831)。東華書局。
【Yang, X.-Y. (1989). Content analysis. In C.-H. Chang, G.-S. Yang, & C.-I. Wen (Eds.), Social and behavioral science research law (Vol. 2, pp. 809-831). Tung Hua Book.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式
陳茹玲曾厚強連啟舜蔡旻穎宋曜廷(2025)。應用智慧型家教系統於國小學童閱讀策略
教學之學習歷程研究。教育科學研究期刊,70(2),195-233。
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202506_70(2).0006
APA Format
Chen, J.-L., & Tseng, H.-C., & Lien, C.-S., & Tsai, M.-Y., & Sung, Y.-T. (2025). A Study on the Learning Process of Applying an Autotutoring System to Teach Reading Strategies to Elementary School ChildrenJournal of Research in Education Sciences, 70(2), 195-233. 
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202506_70(2).0006

Journal directory listing - Volume 70 (2025) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【70(2)】June

A Study on the Learning Process of Applying an Autotutoring System to Teach Reading Strategies to Elementary School Children
Author:
Ju-Ling Chen (Research Center for Translation, Compilation and Language Education, National Academy for Educational Research), Hou-Chiang Tseng (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Chi-Shun Lien (Center for Teacher Education, National Chung Cheng University), Min-Ying Tsai (Research Center for Translation, Compilation and Language Education, National Academy for Educational Research), Yao-Ting Sung (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 70, No. 2
Date:June 2025
Pages:195-233
DOI:​https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202506_70(2).0006

Abstract:

Purpose
  This study has two main purposes. First, it aims to explore learners’ use of strategies and learning performance within an autotutor environment, using word embedding technique. Second, it investigates the learning processes and cognitive patterns of learners with different reading abilities. By analyzing these patterns, particularly the differences in learning trajectories and strategy application between groups, this study offers several suggestions for instructional design.
Literature Review
Many empirical studies support the idea that reading strategies can significantly enhance text comprehension and improve learning outcomes. However, existing research still has some limitations, particularly in addressing cognitive differences among readers and meeting the specific needs of learners with lower reading abilities. Interactive teaching methods, such as teacher-student dialogues, facilitate real-time communication and feedback, supporting active learning and enhancing performance, especially for students with lower reading abilities. However, these approaches require substantial human and time resources, making large-scale application challenging.
The autotutor system offers an effective solution to these limitations. By creating a technology-based learning environment, the autotutor system guides learners through interactive dialogue, encouraging them to engage in higher-order thinking, learn academic content, and apply strategic learning. Nevertheless, certain limitations exist in current autotutor research. First, researchers tend to rely on latent semantic analysis (LSA) techniques, which are less capable than neural networks in extracting semantic information. Second, most studies rely on general instructional guidelines to address subject knowledge and problem-solving but lack specific designs for incorporating reading strategies. Furthermore, few studies have focused on elementary school students as primary subjects.
Method
This study conducted a two-factor mixed design to examine the learning processes and outcomes of students receiving reading strategy instruction. The between-subject factor is reading ability (high vs. low), while the within-subject factor is test type (pre-test and post-test), with background knowledge as a covariate. Participants included 53 fifth-grade students with varying reading abilities from elementary schools in Taipei, New Taipei, and Keelung. Using the Automated Reading Elaboration System, students individually learned five reading strategies and relevant subject knowledge. Their learning processes, including learning time, learning paths, and cognitive patterns, were assessed along with their learning performance, which measured the frequency of reading strategy use and knowledge acquisition. To analyze learning performance, a two-factor mixed-design ANCOVA was employed, with reading ability as a between-subject factor, test type as a within-subject factor, background knowledge as a covariate, and the frequency of reading strategy use and knowledge content as dependent variables. Learning process analysis used a one-way ANOVA, treating reading ability as the independent variable, pre-test background knowledge as a covariate, and learning time and paths as dependent variables.
Results
The autotutor, developed using word embedding technology, facilitated learning by guiding students in applying reading strategies to understand academic content and provided an in-depth analysis of learning paths and cognitive patterns. Key findings from this study are as follows:
1. Strategy Use and Learning Performance Improvement. Both high- and low-reading-ability groups learned to apply reading strategies and showed improvement in learning performance, although the types of strategies used varied. For example, post-test scores in knowledge content were higher than pre-test scores across all students. Notably, the high-reading-ability group scored higher in content knowledge than the low-reading-ability group, suggesting that the autotutor can effectively improve learning outcomes. High-reading-ability students used background knowledge and organizational strategies, while low-reading-ability students relied more on connection inferences. Both groups demonstrated limited use of comprehension monitoring strategies, highlighting the need for further instruction in this area.
2. Differences in Learning Processes and Cognitive Patterns. Learning paths and cognitive patterns varied by reading ability. High-reading-ability learners showed shorter learning paths and required minimal assistance, while low-reading-ability learners needed more explicit prompts and sometimes overlooked the autotutor’s support role in learning. This finding emphasizes the importance of adaptive, differentiated designs in instructional materials and assessments to accommodate the diverse needs of learners.
Discussion
  The study offers the following recommendations:
  1. Enhancing Comprehension Monitoring. Comprehension monitoring was a less frequently used strategy among students, particularly for those with lower reading abilities. Verbal data indicated that, although students attempted to use comprehension monitoring to support understanding, the frequency was low. Future strategy instruction could incorporate demonstrations of self-assessment and error detection, supported by awareness scales that illustrate the effectiveness of comprehension monitoring. Additionally, demonstrating the impact of comprehension strategies through practical examples may improve student engagement with this technique.
  2. Strengthening Elaborative Inference for Low-Reading-Ability Learners. Low-reading- ability learners often relied on shallow connection inferences, producing responses unrelated to content. The autotutor could support comprehension by providing background knowledge and guiding students in connecting the text to personal experiences, using explicit cues in instructional materials to aid understanding.
  3. Personalized Instruction for High-Reading-Ability Learners. High-reading-ability learners displayed distinct learning processes and cognitive patterns, suggesting the benefit of personalized course designs. Data revealed that these students needed minimal guidance, while low-reading-ability students benefited from clear prompts. Conducting preliminary analyses of students’ cognitive patterns could inform individualized instructional materials and feedback mechanisms.
  4. Using a Large Semantic Space to Enhance Strategy Learning. In contrast to previous work based on LSA, this study leverages a large-scale word2vec-based semantic space to enable precise meaning judgment, allowing for more accurate handling of learners’ open-ended responses and facilitating more realistic teaching within the autotutor.
Conclusion
  In conclusion, this study highlights the effectiveness of autotutor systems in supporting learning, analyzing students’ learning paths, and identifying differences in strategy use. It provides insights for personalized reading instruction, showing that autotutors can effectively address diverse reading abilities. Future research could refine instructional design, assessment tools, and the ethical use of large language models to further enhance learning outcomes. For example, applying fine-tuning to integrate knowledge into Llama 3 could reduce incorrect information in responses and enable more sophisticated meaning analysis, allowing teaching strategies to be more flexible and diverse.
This study demonstrates that autotutor systems, combined with adaptive design and reading strategy instruction, effectively meet the needs of diverse learners, especially those with varying reading abilities. Future research can build on these findings to create more advanced autotutor environments for education.

Keywords:

natural language processing, representation learning, autotutor, word embedding, reading strategies