Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(1)】March

The Development of a Text Leveling Framework
Ju-Ling Chen(Center for Teacher Education, National Taitung University), Shin-Ting Tsai(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Yi-Shian Lee(Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 60, No. 1
Date:March 2015


In this study, reading theories and traditional text leveling systems were integrated and a text leveling framework comprising five aspects (i.e., print features, language and literary features, text structure, content, and diversity), 17 criteria, and 58 indicators was developed. Subsequently, 25 experts in the reading research and reading education fields were invited to assess the importance of these aspects, criteria, and indicators to text leveling. Data were analyzed using the analytic hierarchy process. The results show that content was the most critical aspect influencing text comprehensibility, followed by language and literary features, text structure, diversity, and print features. Overall, the five indicators in this framework with the highest global weight were truthfulness, consistency of perspective, number of perspectives, depth of concepts, and popular culture. Text length exhibited the lowest global weight. The text leveling framework established in this study includes all the major dimensions affecting comprehension and, through objectively quantifying the importance of leveling indicators, provides highly comprehensive text leveling.

Keywords:analytic hierarchy process, leveling, leveling framework, leveling indicator

《Full Text》 檔名

  1. 宋曜廷、陳茹玲、李宜憲、查日龢、曾厚強、林維駿…張國恩(2013)。中文文本可讀性探討:指標選取、模型建立與效度驗證。中華心理學刊,55(1),75-106。doi:10.6129/CJP.20120621【Sung, Y.-T., Chen, J.-L., Lee, Y.-S., Cha, J.-H., Tseng, H.-C., Lin, W.-C., …Chang, K.-E. (2013). Investigating Chinese text readability: Linguistic features, modeling, and validation. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 75-106. doi:10.6129/CJP.20120621】
  2. 鄧振源、曾國雄(1989)。分析層級法的內涵特性與應用(上)。中國統計學報,27(6),5-27。【Deng, J.-Y., & Tzeng, G.-H. (1989). The analytic hierarchy process: Concepts, techniques and applications (I). Journal of the Chinese Statistical Association, 27(6), 5-27.】
  3. Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2006). Assisting low-performing readers with a group-based reading fluency intervention. School Psychology Review, 35(1), 91-107.
  4. Brandão, A. C., & Oakhill, J. (2005). How do you know this answer? Children’s use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading and Writing, 18, 687-713. doi:10.1007/s11 145-005-5600-x
  5. Bruce, B. C., Rubin, A., & Starr, K. S. (1981). Why readability formulas fail. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC-24(1), 50-52. doi:10.1109/TPC.1981.6447826
» More
APA FormatChen, J.-L., Tsai, S.-T., Sung, Y.-T. & Lee, Y.-S. (2015). The Development of a Text Leveling Framework. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(1), 1-26. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).01