Concept-Based Interdisciplinary Curriculum Development in International Baccalaureate Schools in Taiwan– The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme
Author: Li-Ching Hung (School of Teacher Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Meihui Liu (Department of Education and Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, National Taiwan Normal University), Li-Ping Wang (Department of Education and Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 69, No. 4
Date：December 2024
Pages：199-228
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202412_69(4).0007
Abstract：
The International Baccalaureate Middle Years Programme (IBMYP) is based on an interdisciplinary educational framework distinct from the typically theme-based curriculum designs implemented in Taiwan, and it has been expanding rapidly in the Asia-Pacific region in recent years. Therefore, the case of the curriculum development for the IBMYP may provide valuable insights and potential directions for future curriculum development in Taiwan. Specifically, this explored how International Baccalaureate (IB) schools in Taiwan develop concept-based interdisciplinary curricula to thereby provide a reference for integrated curriculum development in junior high schools.
This study investigated the development process and transformation experiences associated with the concept-based interdisciplinary curricula of the IBMYP in two case schools. The distinctive value of the two case schools, as explored in this study, lays in their implementation of the IB curriculum on a school-wide basis and across all grade levels (instead of as an additional program or in a limited number of experimental classes). Furthermore, the two schools differed in their developmental backgrounds and cultural contexts. One was a private secondary school that implemented the IBMYP curriculum and was predominantly staffed by expatriate teachers with IB teaching experience. The other was an IBMYP-certified public junior high school in Taiwan that implemented the IBMYP curriculum primarily through teachers with Taiwanese teacher certificates. This study explored the transition process from the traditional departmentalized public-school system to a concept-based interdisciplinary curriculum. Additionally, it examined the collaborative efforts of the teacher community in curriculum development and teaching practices, focusing on these two schools to provide valuable insights that were not based on a comparison of their relative merits.
The research period spanned from January 2020 to December 2021. Multiple data collection methods, including document analysis, participant observation, and interviews, were applied. The findings of this study were as follows. (1) Concepts and generalization were regarded as the medium for integrating content during the interdisciplinary curriculum development process. For curriculum integration, the intradisciplinary-cohesion model was first adopted, followed by the interdisciplinary model. (2) Instructional activities were designed using a backward design approach, with inquiry-based tasks, multiple assessments, and rubrics clearly delineating learning objectives. These activities guided students in progressively and actively constructing principles. In class, implementing a student-centered inductive inquiry model instead of a teacher-centered deductive lecturing model was crucial. For educators accustomed to traditional objective-driven, lecture-style teaching, developing a concept-based curriculum necessitated a fundamental shift in their pedagogical mindset, prompting a transformative change in educational philosophy. (3) The current educational reform in Taiwan emphasizes inquiry-based learning and interdisciplinary curriculum design. However, specific guidance has not been provided regarding what this means for teaching practices. The conceptual framework, interdisciplinary integration, and diverse assessment principles of the IB curriculum design provided a reference that teachers could use to refine the curriculum reform process and operationalize the competency-oriented curriculum design of the new curriculum guidelines. The flexibility of the IBMYP in terms of its teaching materials and methods provided room for adjustments between the IB and Taiwanese education systems. These adjustments also promoted continual professional development and created reform momentum for teachers. (4) The development of concept-based interdisciplinary approaches varied across academic subjects because of differences in the systemic structures of their curriculum frameworks. For example, relative to the other subjects, Mathematics and Sciences underwent fewer adjustments in knowledge content. However, because the IBMYP curriculum emphasizes assessment performance and the “application” assessment dimension in both subjects, changes were still observed in how teachers assessed students’ ability to apply learned concepts in real-life contexts. (5) Regarding interdisciplinary collaboration within the teacher community, time and experience were required for disciplinary boundaries to be crossed. During the process of transforming the curriculum development model, which involved changes in curriculum content, teaching methods, and assessments, changes had to be achieved through collaborative discussions, consensus-building, and opinion integration within the teacher community.
The current study synthesized empirical findings pertaining to two schools, revealing the strengths of each school. These findings suggest that the first school achieved a high level of horizontal integration across grades and effectively connected global and local experiences, serving as a model for future curriculum development. The second school conducted vertical integration over 3 years, focusing on coherence and alignment with the features of the National Curriculum Guideline 2019. This demonstrates the school’s pragmatic experiences in integrating the IB program into the national education system. The implications of this study were considered in combination with the practices of the two schools, and a concept-based interdisciplinary curriculum module was summarized to provide a reference for future implementation of such programs.
Keywords：
International Baccalaureate, integrated curriculum, concept-based, interdisciplinary
《Full Text》
References：
- 王麗雲（2015）。國際高中文憑學程探究。課程與教學季刊，18（3），125-155。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201507_18(3).0006 【Wang, L.-Y. (2015). Analyzing international baccalaureate diploma program. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 18(3), 125-155. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201507_18(3).0006】
- 洪麗卿（2022）。從課綱至教學實踐：跨領域課程統整之實施與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊，11（4），28-33。【Hung, L.-C. (2022). From curriculum to teaching practice: Implementation and suggestions for cross-disciplinary curriculum system integration. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 11(4), 28-33.】
- 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。https://vtedu.k12ea.gov.tw/uploads/ 1616562690994IBRYLABS.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. https://vtedu.k12ea. gov.tw/uploads/1616562690994IBRYLABS.pdf】
- 陳玟樺、劉美慧（2020）。探究為本的國中歷史教學實作：以芬蘭一間國際文憑學校課室為例。課程與教學季刊，23（4），59-88。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202010_23(4).0003 【Chen, W.-H., & Liu, M.-H. (2020). Practicing an inquiry-based history teaching and learning: A case study of an IBMYP classroom in Finland. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(4), 59-88.】
- 黃政傑（2019）。教師應具備課程素養。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（12），1-5。【Huang, J.-J. (2019). The curriculum competency required for teacher. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 8(12), 1-5.】
» More
一、中文文獻
- 王麗雲（2015）。國際高中文憑學程探究。課程與教學季刊，18（3），125-155。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201507_18(3).0006【Wang, L.-Y. (2015). Analyzing international baccalaureate diploma program. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 18(3), 125-155. https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201507_18(3).0006】
- 洪麗卿（2022）。從課綱至教學實踐：跨領域課程統整之實施與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊，11（4），28-33。【Hung, L.-C. (2022). From curriculum to teaching practice: Implementation and suggestions for cross-disciplinary curriculum system integration. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 11(4), 28-33.】
- 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。https://vtedu.k12ea.gov.tw/uploads/ 1616562690994IBRYLABS.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. https://vtedu.k12ea. gov.tw/uploads/1616562690994IBRYLABS.pdf】
- 陳玟樺、劉美慧（2020）。探究為本的國中歷史教學實作：以芬蘭一間國際文憑學校課室為例。課程與教學季刊，23（4），59-88。https://doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.202010_23(4).0003【Chen, W.-H., & Liu, M.-H. (2020). Practicing an inquiry-based history teaching and learning: A case study of an IBMYP classroom in Finland. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 23(4), 59-88.】
- 黃政傑（2019）。教師應具備課程素養。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（12），1-5。【Huang, J.-J. (2019). The curriculum competency required for teacher. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 8(12), 1-5.】
- 溫宥基、郭昭佑（2018）。國際文憑（IB）課程之趨勢與啟示。教育研究月刊，293，121-138。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602018090293008【Wen, Y.-J., & Guo, Z.-Y. (2018). Trend and inspiration of international baccalaureate. Journal of Education Research, 293, 121-138. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602018090293008】
- 葉怡芬、劉美慧（2020）。師資培育國際化─國際文憑教師（IBEC）學程中的師資生特質與想法。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），105-133。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES. 202006_65(2).0004 【Yeh, Y.-F., & Liu, M.-H. (2020). Globalization of teacher education program: Characteristics and voices of student teachers in IBEC program. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 105-133. https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202006_65(2).0004】
- 劉蔚之、黃春木（2017）。十二年國教「課程統整」之道。載於白亦方（主編），課程改革2016回顧與展望（頁165-191）。五南。【Liu, W.-C., & Huang, T.-M. (2017). 12-Year basic education “curriculum integration” approach. In I.-F. Pai (Ed.), Curriculum reform 2016 review and outlook (pp. 165-191). Wu-Nan Book.】
二、外文文獻
- Bennet, L., & Hinde, E. R. (Eds.). (2015). Becoming integrated thinker: Case studies in elementary social studies. National Council for the Social Studies.
- Bunnell, T. (2011). The international baccalaureate middle years programme after 30 years: A critical inquiry. Journal of Research in International Education, 10(3), 261-274. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1475240911423604
- Diphoorn, T., Huysmans, M., Knittel, S. C., Leyh, B. M., & van Goch, M. (2023). Traveling concepts in the classroom: Experiences in interdisciplinary education. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 12, 1-14.
- Dombrowski, E., Rotenberg, L., & Bick, M. (2013). Theory of knowledge course book: Oxford IB diploma program course book (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Drake, S. M. (1991). How our team dissolved the boundaries. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 20-22.
- Drake, S. M. (2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum: Aligning curriculum, content, assessment and instruction (2nd ed.). Corwin.
- Drake, S. M., Savage, M., Reid, J. L., Bernard, M., & Beres, J. (2015). An exploration of the policy and practice of transdisciplinarity in the IB PYP Programme. https://www.ibo.org/ globalassets/publications/ib-research/pyp/an-exploration-of-the-policy-and-practice-of-transdisciplinarity-in-the-pyp-final-report.pdf
- Erickson, H. L., Lanning, L., & Rachel, F. (2017). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom (2nd ed.). Sage.
- Hall, J., Elder, T., Thompson, J., & Pollack, S. (2009). IBNA– The primary years programme field study overview and findings. University of Georgia Education Policy and Evaluation Center. https://www.ibo.org/globalassets/new-structure/research/pdfs/ib-pypoverviewreportwithoutschoolnames3-6-09.pdf
- International Baccalaureate Organization. (2008). MYP: From principles into practice. Author.
- International Baccalaureate Organization. (2023a). Curriculum. https://www.ibo.org/ programmes/middle-years-programme/curriculum/
- International Baccalaureate Organization. (2023b). Find an IB world school. https://www.ibo.org/ programmes/find-an-ib-school/
- Jensenius, A. R. (2012). Disciplinarities: Intra, cross, multi, inter, trans. http://www.arj.no/ 2012/03/12/disciplinarities-2/
- Kim, H. (2016). The rise of transnational education corporations in the Asia Pacific. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0260-3
- Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T. C., & Weinland, T. P. (1998). Development of theme-based, interdisciplinary, integrated curriculum: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17426.x
- Marschall, C., & French, R. (2018). Concept-based inquiry in action: Strategies to promote transferable Understanding. Corwin.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
- Mills, H. E. (2013). The impact of U.S. educational policy on the implementation of the IB primary years programme: A case study of an urban, low-income public school. International Baccalaureate Organization.
- Outhwaite, D., & Ferri, G. (2017). Critical reflections on modern elite formation and social differentiation in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme in England. Oxford Review of Education, 43(4), 402-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1329719
- Repko, A. F., & Szostak, R. (2021). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory (4th ed.). Sage.
- Resnik, J. (2020). All against all competition: The incorporation of the International Baccalaureate in public high schools in Canada. Journal of Education Policy, 35(3), 315-336. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/02680939.2018.1562105
- Roberts, P. L., & Kellough, R. D. (2006). A guide for developing interdisciplinary thematic units (4th ed). Merrill.
- Schug, M., & Cross, B. (1998). The dark side of curriculum integration in social studies. The Social Studies, 89, 54-57.
- Storz, M., & Hoffman, A. (2018). Becoming an international baccalaureate middle years program: Perspectives of teachers, students, and administrators. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(3), 216-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18770171
- Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers. The Buck Institute for Education.
- Wall, A., & Leckie, A. (2017). Curriculum integration: An overview. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 22(1), 36-40.
- Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.