From Individual to Collective: Exploring Value Internalization and Experience Transfer in Adventure Education
Author: Huang Chia Hung (Department of Physical Education, National Taitung University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 69, No. 4
Date：December 2024
Pages：29-61
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202412_69(4).0002
Abstract：
Research Motivation and Purpose
Although substantial quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method evidence has been obtained that supports the effects of adventure education on personal development, the research methodologies employed in studies on this topic have inherent limitations. Challenges related to research design rigor, statistical validity, and interview-focused models highlight the need for further investigation into value internalization and experience transfer. The present study investigated whether adventure education, as a medium for behavioral development, provides a context in which participants gain experiential value through nonlinear observations, thereby supplementing current literature findings. Achieving effective learning outcomes involves pre-instructional preparation, in-process adjustments, and post-instruction evaluation in addition to guidance and correction of learners’ behaviors and feedback during the learning process. The internalization of experiential value and the transfer of experiences in adventure education can be assessed through after action reviews (AARs), in which participants’ reflections, discussions, and shared insights are used to evaluate activity effectiveness. The present study focused on learning-by-doing in adventure education, employing the experiential learning cycle model, which comprises experiencing, observing, discussing, and reflecting. The aim of the study was to enhance students’ willingness to actively engage in learning, create peer learning opportunities, improve problem-solving skills, and assist students in clarifying and applying their personal values in their lives, thereby contributing to lifelong learning and development.
Literature Review
Studies on adventure education have highlighted several key principles of experiential learning, including trust building, goal setting, challenge/stress, experience, humor/fun, and problem-solving (Ellmo & Graser, 1995; Schoel et al., 1988). Therefore, the long-lasting benefits of individual participation in adventure education activities should be evaluated on the basis of activity content (Ellmo & Graser, 1995).
The operational model for adventure education activities can be described as a series of waves, comprising phases characterized by peaks, troughs, turbulence, stimulation, calm, and activity (Luckner & Nadler, 1997). This model emphasizes briefing, activity, and debriefing, with participants learning and developing through an activity’s operational mode.
Applying AAR in educational courses involves employing student learning strategies to (1) set group learning goals through discussion, (2) prepare for course learning, (3) stimulate student brainstorming and self-guidance, and (4) engage in peer feedback and observational evaluation. This process guides the implementation of teaching activities, ensuring high teaching quality and effectiveness. Continuous AAR after an activity enables focused, efficient, and productive discussions, which help individuals or groups gain meaningful experiences through action. In this model, immediate feedback is provided from participants during the teaching process that offers teachers valuable information for adjusting their teaching and improving its effectiveness, which can enhance teaching quality and improve learning outcomes.
Research Methods
The present study involved 39 university students, that is, 24 male (61.54%) and 15 female (38.46%) participants. The main program was a 10-week course comprising 3-hour weekly adventure education activities involving problem-solving and teamwork challenges. Data were collected on the participants’ involvement across the 10 weeks, and feedback was obtained from the participants. Term frequency-inverse document frequency weight analysis was employed to determine the value the participants derived from these activities, and word clouds were generated to visualize the findings.
Research Results
The participants’ self-reported activity engagement scores ranged from 3 to 10, with an overall average of 7.87 ± 1.49, indicating a high level of participation. Semantic analysis of the text mining results indicated that the top 10 core values participants focused on during the activities were “we,” “self,” “trust,” “completion,” “life,” “team,” “leader,” “success,” “belief,” and “goal.” The terms “we” and “self” ranked highly in the weight analysis, suggesting that the participants reflected on their roles and relationships within the group context, shifting from a focus on self-identity to one of alignment with shared group values.
Qualitative data analysis revealed that the participants’ involvement in adventure education followed four developmental stages: communication and cooperation awareness, trust building and problem-solving, mutual support and leadership collaboration, and team cooperation and group cohesion.
Discussion and Recommendations
The present study revealed that the implementation of adventure education promoted the development of dynamic relationships, with participants gradually transitioning from a focus on individual perspectives to shared, collective values. The four key stages of this process were as follows.
1. Communication and Cooperation Awareness
The participants recognized their connection to the group and began to identify as members of the group. This sense of identification fostered resonance among the participants, establishing a foundation for the formation of closer relationships.
2. Trust Building and Problem-Solving
The participants developed trust during the activities, which increased their willingness to support and help each other overcome difficulties, which strengthened their team bonds and enhanced their problem-solving abilities.
3. Mutual Support and Leadership Collaboration
The leaders and followers among the participants supported and encouraged each other, which enabled the team members to realize their potential and achieve higher, shared goals.
4. Team Cooperation and Group Cohesion
The participants transitioned from an individual-oriented to a team-oriented mindset, demonstrating active engagement in team activities and tasks. They recognized their complementary strengths and learned how to work together toward common goals.
In summary, focusing on participants’ psychological processes, particularly those related to beliefs, emotional expressions, and behavioral tendencies, during their pursuit of goals is crucial. Understanding these behaviors can provide key insights into participants’ changes and growth, with individuals gradually recognizing the connection between the individual and the group through adventure education activities and recognizing their shared values. Furthermore, an environment that encourages active learning and the development of social skills must be established.
Educators should adopt the low-cost, high-efficiency model for adventure education courses that was proposed in the current study and integrate similar activities into other types of courses. This strategy can enhance course appeal and create opportunities for young people to engage in social and personal development.
Keywords：after action review, learning by doing, adventure in the classroom, experiential learning cycle
《Full Text》
References：
- 王伯宇（2015）。冒險教育課程對小型企業員工教育訓練之長期成效研究。臺灣運動教育學報，10（1），31-50。https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.2015.10(1).03【Wang, P.-Y. (2015). The long-term effects of adventure experiential education on a small-sized business. Journal of Taiwan Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.2015.10(1).03】
- 石偉源、何篤光（2020）。應用文字探勘法分析大數據時代體育研究發展趨勢。體育學報，53（4），439-451。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202012_53(4).0006【Shih, W.-Y., & Ho, T.-K. (2020). Application of the text mining method to analyze the development trends of sports research in the era of big data. Physical Education Journal, 53(4), 439-451. https://doi.org/10.6222/ pej.202012_53(4).0006】
- 江婉琪、林應龍、禹良治、張鈺旋、陳俞安、王復中、黃珮珊、林寬佳（2019）。運用文字探勘分析全民健保與五項總額支付制度之民眾知覺感受。臺灣衛誌，38（2），189-202。https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.201904_38(2).107137【Chiang, W.-C., Lin, Y.-L., Yu, L.-C., Chang, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-A., Wang, F.-C., Huang, P.-S., & Lin, K.-C. (2019). Application of text mining in the public perception analysis of global budget payment and National Health Insurance systems. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 38(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.6288/ TJPH.201904_38(2).107137】
- 吳崇旗（2006）。建構戶外冒險教育效益機轉之模式：以繩索挑戰課程為例（未出版博士論文）。國立體育學院。【Wu, C.-C. (2006). Constructing model of the mechanisms for outdoor adventure education benefits: Taking challenge ropes courses for example [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National College of Physical Education and Sports.】
- 吳崇旗（2014）。冒險教育登山課程對大學生生活效能與團隊凝聚力之成效。大專體育學刊，16（1），1-13。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1601.001【Wu, C.-C. (2014). Effects of adventure education mountaineering courses on undergraduates’ life-effectiveness and group cohesion. Sports & Exercise Research, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1601.001】
» More
一、中文文獻
- 王伯宇（2015）。冒險教育課程對小型企業員工教育訓練之長期成效研究。臺灣運動教育學報，10（1），31-50。https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.2015.10(1).03【Wang, P.-Y. (2015). The long-term effects of adventure experiential education on a small-sized business. Journal of Taiwan Sport Pedagogy, 10(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.2015.10(1).03】
- 石偉源、何篤光（2020）。應用文字探勘法分析大數據時代體育研究發展趨勢。體育學報，53（4），439-451。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202012_53(4).0006 【Shih, W.-Y., & Ho, T.-K. (2020). Application of the text mining method to analyze the development trends of sports research in the era of big data. Physical Education Journal, 53(4), 439-451. https://doi.org/10.6222/ pej.202012_53(4).0006】
- 江婉琪、林應龍、禹良治、張鈺旋、陳俞安、王復中、黃珮珊、林寬佳（2019）。運用文字探勘分析全民健保與五項總額支付制度之民眾知覺感受。臺灣衛誌，38（2），189-202。https://doi.org/10.6288/TJPH.201904_38(2).107137 【Chiang, W.-C., Lin, Y.-L., Yu, L.-C., Chang, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-A., Wang, F.-C., Huang, P.-S., & Lin, K.-C. (2019). Application of text mining in the public perception analysis of global budget payment and National Health Insurance systems. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 38(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.6288/ TJPH.201904_38(2).107137】
- 吳崇旗（2006）。建構戶外冒險教育效益機轉之模式：以繩索挑戰課程為例（未出版博士論文）。國立體育學院。【Wu, C.-C. (2006). Constructing model of the mechanisms for outdoor adventure education benefits: Taking challenge ropes courses for example [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National College of Physical Education and Sports.】
- 吳崇旗（2014）。冒險教育登山課程對大學生生活效能與團隊凝聚力之成效。大專體育學刊，16（1），1-13。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1601.001 【Wu, C.-C. (2014). Effects of adventure education mountaineering courses on undergraduates’ life-effectiveness and group cohesion. Sports & Exercise Research, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.1601.001】
- 吳崇旗、李晟瑋（2019）。冒險教育方案對國中資優生領導能力之成效。大專體育學刊，21（4），295-315。https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.201912_21(4).0001 【Wu, C.-C., & Li, C.-W. (2019). Effectiveness of adventure education program on leadership amongst gifted junior high school students. Sports & Exercise Research, 21(4), 295-315. https://doi.org/10.5297/ ser.201912_21(4).0001】
- 吳崇旗、李晟瑋（2021）。探索與冒險教育：理論與實踐。亞洲體驗教育協會。【Wu, C.-C., & Li, C.-W. (2021). Adventure education: Theory and practice. Asia Association of Experiential Education.】
- 吳崇旗、林思妤、王偉琴（2019）。冒險教育方案對網路成癮青少年之成效研究。體育學報，52（2），241-261。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.201906_52(2).0008 【Wu, C.-C., Lin, S.-Y., & Wang, W.-C. (2019). The effects of the adventure education program for adolescents with internet addiction behavior. Physical Education Journal, 52(2), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.6222/ pej.201906_52(2).0008】
- 巫昌陽、吳崇旗（2011）。自力造筏課程對大學生生活效能之成效影響。體育學報，44（2），245-260。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4402.201106.0906 【Wu, C.-Y., & Wu, C.-C. (2011). Effects of the self-built raft courses on college students' life-effectiveness. Physical Education Journal, 44(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.4402.201106.0906】
- 李永山、李家寧、黃俊閎、黃世育（2022）。應用文本分析於輿論聲量分析之研究。資訊電子學刊，10（1），85-99。【Lee, Y.-S., Lee, C.-N., Huang, C.-H., & Huang, S.-Y. (2022). The research of applying text analysis techniques on the analysis of public opinion. Journal of Informatics and Electronics, 10(1), 85-99.】
- 林瑋芳（2023）。字詞分析工具（LIWC）的理論基礎及其在體育領域的應用。體育學報，56（1），1-16。https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202303_56(1).0001 【Lin, W.-F. (2023). Linguistic inquiry and word count in sport and exercise. Physical Education Journal, 56(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.6222/pej.202303_56(1).0001】
- 洪建任、洪煌佳（2019）。探索教育課程對大學生生活效能之影響。臺東大學體育學報，30，49-64。【Hung, C.-J., & Hung, H.-C. (2019). The adventure education university student life effectiveness. Journal of Physical Education National Taitung University, 30, 49-64.】
- 洪煌佳（2021）。課堂冒險：探索教育活動實施對大學生團隊凝聚力與生活效能影響之研究。人文社會科學研究：教育類，15（1），31-47。https://doi.org/10.6618/HSSRP.202103_15(1).2 【Hung, H.-C. (2021). “Adventure in the classroom”: The effectiveness of adventure education on team cohesion and life efficiency among college students. NPUST Humanities and Social Sciences Research: Pedagogy, 15(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.6618/HSSRP.202103_15(1).2】
- 徐綺穗（2012）。大學教學的創新模式：「行動－反思」教學對大學生學習成就、批判思考意向及學業情緒影響之研究。課程與教學，15（1），119-149。https://doi.org/10.6384/ CIQ.201201.0120 【Hsu, C.-S. (2012). The effects of “action-reflection” teaching model on undergraduates’ achievement, critical thinking disposition and academic emotions. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 15(1), 119-149. https:// doi.org/10.6384/CIQ.201201.0120】
- 許雅淳、蕭如軒、吳崇旗（2022）。體驗教育方案對大學運動社團領導者溝通能力之影響。臺灣運動教育學報，17（1），63-83。https://doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.202205_17(1).04 【Hsu, Y.-C., Hsiao, R.-S., & Wu, C.-C. (2022). The influences of experiential education programs for university sports clubs leaders in communication competence. Journal of Taiwan Sport Pedagogy, 17(1), 63-83. https:// doi.org/10.6580/JTSP.202205_17(1).04】
- 陳世榮（2015）。社會科學研究中的文字探勘應用：以文意為基礎的文件分類及其問題。人文及社會科學集刊，27（4），683-718。【Chen, S.-R. (2015). Text mining for social studies: Meaning-based document classification and its problems. Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy, 27(4), 683-718.】
- 鄧丹莉、吳崇旗（2016）。體驗式學習融入高中野外求生課程設計之成效研究。公民教育與活動領導學報，24，113-139。https://doi.org/10.6231/CEL.2016(24)04 【Tan, T.-L., & Wu, C.-C. (2016). Effects of experiential learning based wilderness survival courses on senior high school students. The Bulletin of Civic Education and Leadership, 24, 113-139. https://doi.org/10.6231/ CEL.2016(24)04】
- 薛銘卿、林育正（2009）。冒險教育活動方案對青少年問題解決能力影響之研究。體驗教育學報，3，67-85。https://doi.org/10.6783/JAAEE.200912.0067 【Hsueh, M.-C., & Lin, Y.-Z. (2009). A study on the impact of adventure education activity programs on adolescents’ problem-solving abilities. Journal of Asia Association for Experiential Education, 3, 67-85. https://doi.org/ 10.6783/JAAEE.200912.0067】
- 鍾智林、徐偉哲（2023）。開放資料驅動之教學實踐研究計畫特性與命名關鍵語詞。教育實踐與研究，36（1），121-161。【Chung, C.-L., & Hsu, W.-C. (2023). Characteristics and title keywords of teaching practice research projects driven by open data. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 36(1), 121-161.】
- 譚躍（2023）。文字探勘基礎：從R語言入門。五南。【Tan, Y. (2023). Basics of text exploration: Getting started with R language. Wu-Nan Book.】
- 蘇玲慧、高家斌（2011）。行動後反思在學校組織之應用探究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊，7，239-262。https://doi.org/10.6754/TCUJ.201102.0239 【Su, L.-H., & Kao, C.-P. (2011). An exploratory study of after action review applied to school organizations. Tzu-Chi University Journal of The Educational Research, 7, 239-262. https://doi.org/10.6754/TCUJ. 201102.0239】
二、外文文獻
- Allen, W. (2016, October 17). After action reviews– And how they can be linked with ToCs to support strategic thinking. Learning for sustainability: Supporting engagement, co-design and adaptation. https://learningforsustainability.net/post/after-action-reviews/
- Baird, L., Holland, P., & Deacon, S. (1999). Learning from action: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference. Organizational Dynamics, 27(4), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(99)90027-X
- Baldwin, C., Persing, J., & Magnuson, D. (2004). The role of theory, research, and evaluation in adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 26(3), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590402600307
- Bradberry, L. A., & De Maio, J. (2018). Learning by doing: The long-term impact of experiential learning programs on student success. Journal of Political Science Education, 15(1), 94-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2018.1485571
- Brown, M., & Beames, S. (2017). Adventure education: Redux*. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(4), 294-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2016.1246257
- Bunting, C. J., & Townley, J. T. (1999). A synthesis of environmental and adventure education concepts: A professional responsibility. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure programming (pp. 433-437). Venture.
- Dweck, C. S. (2017). From needs to goals and representations: Foundations for a unified theory of motivation, personality, and development. Psychological Review, 124(6), 689-719. https:// doi.org/10.1037/rev0000082
- Ellmo, W., & Graser, J. (1995). Adapted adventure activities: A rehabilitation model for adventure programming and group initiatives. Kendall/Hunt.
- Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2008/03/is-yours-a-learning-organization#comment-section
- Goldenberg, M. A., Klenosky, D. B., O’Leary, J. T., & Templin, T. J. (2000). A means-end investigation of ropes course experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(2), 208-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949914
- Henton, M. (1996). Adventure in the classroom: Using adventure to strengthen learning and build a community of life-long learners. Kendall/Hunt.
- Johnson, K. A., Bland, M. K., & Rathsam, S. M. (2001). “Recreating” the healthcare paradigm. Parks & Recreation, 36(7), 58-68.
- Koszałka-Silska, A., Korcz, A., & Wiza, A. (2021). The impact of physical education based on the adventure education programme on self-esteem and social competences of adolescent boys. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3021. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063021
- Kurtzman, A. E., Beddoes, Z., & Gaudreault, K. L. (2023). Social-emotional learning through adventure education in PETE: Strategies for PETE faculty. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 94(6), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2023.2221714
- Liao, P. W. (2019). Experiential learning is an effective training model to improve self-esteem. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.18510/ hssr.2019.7521
- Luckner, J. L., & Nadler, R. S. (1997). Processing the experience: Strategies to enhance and generalize learning (2nd ed). Kendall/Hunt.
- National Library Board Singapore. (2024, December 18). Teach less, learn more. Singapore Infopedia. https://www.nlb.gov.sg/main/article-detail?cmsuuid=bf38bb79-2b26-4068-828c-c89246c65c10
- Prince, H., Christie, E., Humberstone, B., & Pedersen Gurholt, K. P. (2018). Adventure education and outdoor learning: Examining journal trends since 2000. In P. Becker, B. Humberstone, C. Loynes, & J. Schirp (Eds.), The changing world of outdoor learning in Europe. Routledge Research in Education (pp. 144-159). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170671-13
- Russell, K. C. (2006). Publishing to the choir or digging deep: Implications of a snapshot of experiential education research. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(3), 243-247. https:// doi.org/10.1177/105382590602800306
- Růžičková, A., Štěrbová, D., Másilka, D., & Vičar, M. (2023). Exploring students’ emotional experiences on a 7-day outdoor personal development course: Investigating emotional dynamics across different programme elements. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2023.2261123
- Sawyer, T. L., & Deering, S. (2013). Adaptation of the US army’s after-action review for simulation debriefing in healthcare. The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, 8(6), 388-397. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31829ac85c
- Scarf, D., Hayhurst, J. G., Riordan, B. C., Boyes, M., Ruffman, T., & Hunter, J. A. (2017). Increasing resilience in adolescents: The importance of social connectedness in adventure education programmes. Australasian Psychiatry, 25(2), 154-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1039856216671668
- Schoel, J., Prouty, D., & Radcliffe, P. (1988). Islands of healing: A guide to adventure based counseling. Project Adventure.
- Shirilla, P., Solid, C., & Graham, S. E. (2022). The benefits of longitudinal data and multilevel modeling to measure change in adventure education research. Journal of Experiential Education, 45(1), 88-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259211027595
- Stanley, D., & Castles, G. (2017). The so what strategy: Introducing classic storylines that answer one of the most uncomfortable questions in business. Michael Hanrahan.
- Stevens-Adams, S. M., Basilico, J. D., Abbott, R. G., Gieseler, C. J., & Forsythe, C. (2010). Using after-action review based on automated performance assessment to enhance training effectiveness. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54(27), 2309-2313. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193121005402719
- Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learning and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
- Villado, A. J., & Arthur, W., Jr. (2013). The comparative effect of subjective and objective after-action reviews on team performance on a complex task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(3), 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031510