期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(1)三月刊(本期專題:語言與文化教育政策)
Directory

(專題)東北亞四國英語教育政策之比較
作者:國立臺灣師範大學英語學系陳浩然、國立臺灣師範大學英語學系鄭雅双、國立臺灣師範大學英語學系郭亭吟、國立臺灣師範大學英語學系林欣儀

卷期:65卷第1期
日期:2020年3月
頁碼:1-26
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0001

摘要:
本研究主旨為分析臺、中、日、韓四國之國中小英語政策,解析臺灣2030年雙語國家政策之可行性。透過文獻整理,爬梳四國之國中小英語課程之起始年齡、授課時數、教學方法、單字量、本國籍英語教師與外籍師資、教科書與未來英語教育政策等八大面向,經由比較四國英語政策之相似處與相異處,提供意見供相關政策參酌。研究發現,除了日本於2020年起從國小五年級開始上英語課,臺、中、韓三國之英語政策皆將英語課的起始年齡調整為國小三年級,英語課的教學法皆改為使用以溝通為導向之教學法為教學的核心理念。本研究針對臺灣現行國小英語政策提出五點建議:一、臺灣在國小階段的單字量可再斟酌增加;二、臺灣在國中階段的英語課總時數可調整;三、運用AI人工智慧科技於英語教學中;四、建立更健全的英語師資培訓系統;五、需建立謹慎的外籍師資遴選制度與配套措施。

關鍵詞:英語政策、英語教學法、雙語國家

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
    1. 中華人民共和國教育部(1991)。高等學校聘請外國文教專家和外籍教師的規定http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/199108/t19910810_81927.html 【Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (1991). Provisions on employing foreign cultural and educational experts and foreign teachers in colleges and universities. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/ srcsite/A02/s5911/moe_621/199108/t19910810_81927.html】
    2. 中華人民共和國教育部(2010)。國家中長期教育改革和發展規劃綱要。取自http://www. moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201008/t20100802_93704.html 【Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2010). Outline of national medium and long-term education reform and development plan. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/ 201008/t20100802_93704.html】
    3. 中華人民共和國教育部(2011)。義務教育英語課程標準。北京市:北京師範大學出版社。 【Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2011). Compulsory education English course standards. Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University.】
    4. 王淑暖、鐘秀雪、楊朝銘、邱家麟、黃建通、王振勝(2005)。國民小學實施英語教學的困境與因應對策。載於國家教育研究院(主編),102期國小校長儲訓班專題研究(pp. 453-481)。臺北市:編者。 【Wang, S.-N., Zhong, X.-X., Yang, C.-M., Qiu, J.-L., Huang, J.-T., & Wang, Z.-S. (2005). Difficulties and countermeasures of English teaching in public elementary schools. In National Academy of Educational Research (Ed.), Principal research projects 102 (pp. 453-481). Taipei, Taiwan: Editor.】
    5. 全國人民代表大會常務委員會(2005)。中華人民共和國教師法。取自http://big5.gov.cn/gate/ big5/www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-05/25/content_937.htm 【Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2005). Teachers law of the People’s Republic of China. Retrieved from http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-05/25/ content_937.htm】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式陳浩然、鄭雅双、郭亭吟、林欣儀(2020)。東北亞四國英語教育政策之比較。教育科學研究期刊65(1),1-25。 doi:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0001
APA FormatChen, H.-J., Cheng, Y.-S., Kuo, T.-Y., & Lin, H.-Y. (2020). Comparison of English Education Policies in East Asian Countries. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(1), 1-25. doi:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0001

Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(1)】March (Special Issue: Language and Culture Education Policies)
Directory

(Special Issue) Comparison of English Education Policies in East Asian Countries
Author: Hao-Jan Chen (Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University), Ya-Shuang Cheng (Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University), Ting-Ying Kuo (Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University), Hsin-Yi Lin (Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 65, No.1
Date:March 2020
Pages:1-26
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0001

Abstract:
This study examined the English education policies for elementary and junior high schools in Taiwan, China, Japan, and South Korea to evaluate the feasibility of practicing the “Bilingual Nation by 2030” policy in Taiwan, and the English education policies in these countries were compared. This study focuses on the following eight aspects: the starting age of English education, total English lesson hours, English teaching methodology, assigned English vocabulary, English teacher training, native-English-speaking teacher recruitment, textbooks and teaching materials, and future policy. This study provides two major observations: First, three of the aforementioned countries begin English lessons in Grade 3. However, Japan begins in Grade 5. Second, all of the countries currently employ a communicative approach as their English teaching method. This study further provides five suggestions for future policy: First, more advanced English vocabulary should be taught at the elementary school level. Second, the number of English lesson hours for students should be increased. Third, English teachers in Taiwan should utilize artificial intelligence in their teaching of English. Fourth, training courses for English teachers should be improved. Finally, the processes of recruiting and supporting English teachers from foreign countries should be planned appropriately.

Keywords:English education policy, English teaching methodology, bilingual nation