期刊目錄列表 - 69卷(2024) - 【師大學報】69(2)九月刊(本期專題:永續與人文:人文視野下的環境與生態)
Directory
道德對待動物的理由之探究──在道德個體主義與整體主義之間
作者:梁奮程(東海大學哲學系助理教授)
卷期:69卷第2期
日期:2024年9月
頁碼:79-98
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6210/JNTNU.202409_69(2).0004
摘要:
本文的主要目的在探究道德對待動物之理由,主張在「基於能力的理由」、「基於關係的理由」與「基於自然環境價值的理由」之外,還有「基於固有價值的理由」以及「基於能力進路的理由」,而且這五個道德對待動物的理由可以成為一個理由光譜,動物倫理研究順著這個光譜可以進一步拓展道德對待動物之理由。本文在論述的過程中,將陸續展示這些不同理由所遭遇的困難,以及後續的理由論述如何更加完備地處理這個問題。本文認為納斯邦(Martha C. Nussbaum)的能力進路是截至目前為止道德對待動物之最適切的理由,因為它考量到動物多樣性與差異性,不純然只把動物當作工具看待,根據不同物種的動物性賦予牠們尊嚴,而且其道德理由保護動物的範圍非常廣大與多樣。
關鍵詞:內在價值、固有價值、物種規範、個體主義、能力進路
《詳全文》
參考文獻:
» 展開更多
南宋‧朱熹,《四書章句集注》,北京市:中華書局,2016。
DQ地球圖輯隊,〈獵人可合法撲殺500萬隻袋鼠 澳洲國寶引生態平衡難題〉,https://today. line.me/tw/v2/article/mWEYay2,2024年6月17日下載。
李凱恩,〈道德對待動物之理由淺悉〉,《應用倫理評論》,66期(2019),頁1-14。
金利卡(Will Kymlicka)、唐納森(Sue Donaldson),《動物公民:動物權利的政治哲 學》,白舜羽譯,臺北市:貓頭鷹出版社,2021。
納斯邦(Martha C. Nussbaum),《正義的前沿》,朱慧玲、謝惠媛、陳文娟譯,北京市:中 國人民大學出版社,2016。
納斯邦(Martha C. Nussbaum),《正義的界限:殘障、全球正義與動物正義》,徐子婷、楊 雅婷、何景榮譯,臺北縣:韋伯文化國際出版有限公司,2008。 納斯邦(Martha C. Nussbaum),《為動物的正義:我們的集體責任》,王珀譯,北京市:中 信出版集團,2024。
梁奮程,〈從人與物之區分到道德能動者與容受者之區分〉,《鵝湖月刊》,542期 (2020),頁53-57。
梁奮程,〈從強義動物權到人對動物的義務〉,《應用倫理評論》,51期(2011),頁35 54。
雷根(Tom Regan),《動物權利研究》,李曦譯,北京市:北京大學出版社,2010。
錢永祥,《人性之鏡:動物倫理的歷史與哲學》,新北市:聯經出版事業股份有限公司, 2023。
Kosgaard, Christine M. Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2018.
May, Todd. “Moral Individualism, Moral Relationalism, and Obligations to Non-human Animals.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 31, no. 2 (2014): 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12055.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw
Nussbaum, Martha C. Justice for Animals: Our Collective Responsibility. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2023.
Rachels, James. Created from Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192177759.001.0001.
Regan, Tom. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520404441
Journal directory listing - Volume 69 (2024) - Journal of NTNU【69(2)】September
Directory
An Inquiry into the Reasons for the Moral Treatment of Animals: Between Moral Individualism and Holism
Author: Fan-Ching Leung ( Department of Philosophy, Tunghai University, Assistant Professor )
Vol.&No.:Vol. 69, No. 2
Date:September 2024
Pages:79-98
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6210/JNTNU.202409_69(2).0004
Abstract:
The main purpose of this article is to explore the reasons for the moral treatment of animals. It asserts that, in addition to “capacity-based reasons,” “relation-based reasons,” and “natural environmental value-based reasons,” there are also “inherent-value-based reasons” and reasons from the Capabilities Approach. These five reasons for the moral treatment of animals can form a spectrum of reasons, which can further expand the moral justification for the treatment of animals when explored along this spectrum. Throughout the discussion, the article will demonstrate the difficulties encountered by these different reasons and how subsequent doctrines can more comprehensively address these issues. The article posits that Martha C. Nussbaum’s Capability Approach is currently the most appropriate reason for the moral treatment of animals, as it considers the diversity and differences of animals, does not merely regard animals as means, accords them dignity based on the animality of different species, and its moral reasoning can protect a wide and diverse range of animals.
Keywords:intrinsic value, inherent value, species norm, individualism, capabilities approach