（專題）攻讀跨國雙聯博士學制之國際移動體驗與意涵：以比利時臺灣雙聯博士學位學生為例

卷期：65卷第4期
日期：2020年12月
頁碼：65-103
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0003

摘要：
推動雙聯博士學制是近年來臺灣高等教育機構推動國際化及提升博士班招生吸引力的重要策略。然而，關於臺灣學生赴海外攻讀雙聯博士學位之相關研究則尚未可見。對此，本研究藉由質性研究途徑之自我民族誌和半結構式訪談法，探究學生赴海外攻讀雙聯博士學位之國際移動體驗與意涵，共七位參與臺灣和比利時雙聯博士學制計畫（跨機構聯合雙學位）的學生及教授參與本研究。本研究發現，這些學生原有赴海外攻讀博士學位的規劃，而時間、經費等成本效益計算，以及創造在學術環境中的差異性與獨特性等考量，皆是促使其參與雙聯博士學制之重要因素。而在赴海外學習的過程中，跨文化溝通、兩國培育機制、東西方文化與教授指導方式之差異等，都對學生產生學習和適應上的挑戰，然其在過程中亦發展出調適策略，並逐漸找到自身價值、學術定位與認同感。但由於相關規定對海外修業時間的限制，使得這些學生在參與當地社會及拓展當地人際關係網絡產生侷限；此外，社會對此學制的理解有限與誤解，亦可能負向影響雙聯博士學位畢業生在學術就業職場上的移動能力，以及未來學生參與此學制之意願。就此，本研究亦提出相關實務與研究建議，以促進未來雙聯博士學制之推動。

關鍵詞：比利時、博士培育、臺灣高等教育、學生國際移動、雙聯博士學位

《詳全文》

1. 王秀槐、張珍瑋（2016）。「其實你不懂我的心！」檢視臺灣吸引國際學生策略與學生來臺經驗落差之研究。教育科學研究期刊，61（4），243-270。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).09【Wang, H.-H., & Chang, C.-W. (2016). “You don’t know what really matters to me!” Examining the gaps between governmental policies and student perspectives in international student recruitment practices in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(4), 243-270. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).09】
2. 王湘月（2019）。臺灣高等教育國際化與在地國際化之初探。南臺人文社會學報，20，31-68。【Wang, H.-Y. (2019). A preliminary inquiry into the internationalization and internationalization at home of Taiwan’s higher education. STUST Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20, 31-68.】
3. 余曉雯（2009）。留學作為一種發展的可能性：從六個臺灣留德女學生的生命故事探討留學之意義。教育科學研究期刊，54（3），109-138。doi:10.3966/2073753X2009095403005【Yu, H.-W. (2009). Studying abroad as a possibility of development: Exploring the educational meaning of studying abroad from the life stories of six Taiwan female students in Germany. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(3), 109-138.doi:10.3966/2073753X2009095403005】
4. 吳佩諭（2018，11月9日）。高學歷就業現況調查。產經新聞網。取自https://www.1111.com.tw/news/jobns/116682【Wu, P.-Y. (2018, November 9). A survey on those in employment with high educational background levels. Taiwan Business News. Retrieved from https://www.1111.com.tw/news/jobns/116682】
5. 吳清山（2017）。確保雙聯學制品質　提升學生國際競爭力。師友月刊，598，0-4。doi:10.6437/EM.201704_(598).0001【Wu, C.-S. (2017). Ensuring the quality of a joint degree program, enhancing students’ potential for international competitiveness. The Educator Monthly, 598, 0-4. doi:10.6437/EM.201704_(598).0001】

(Special Issue) Multidimensional Meanings of Studying Abroad: International Mobility Experiences of Taiwanese Joint Dual Doctoral Program Students in Belgium

Vol.&No.：Vol. 65, No. 4
Date：December 2020
Pages：65-103
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0003

Abstract：
Promoting dualdoctoral degree programs is a critical strategy adopted to not only internationalize Taiwan’s higher education system but also improve the low enrollment ratesin doctoral programs in the country. However, limited research attention has been paid to the experiences of Taiwanese students enrolled in dual degree programs. Therefore, the present study adopted a qualitative approach to explore the experiences of Taiwanese students enrolled in a Taiwanese–Belgian joint dual doctoral program. A total of seven Taiwanese students and Belgian scholars participated in this study. The findings indicated that all student informants intended to study abroad before deciding to participate in the joint dual doctoral program; however, due to time and money restrictions, they participated in the joint dual doctoral programs established by their home universities in Taiwan. This study highlighted that students were motivated to participate in international, cooperative doctoral programsbecause obtaining dual learning experiences at both domestic and overseas universities differentiated them from purely domestic doctoral students. In this manner, the experience of studying abroad enhances their unique value in the academic market. While studying abroad, intercultural communication,in addition to differences in doctoral training schemes and supervision styles, were vital challenges that affected student informants’ learning experiences and adaptation to life. During this process, the students constructed their adaptation and negotiation strategies to address those challenges.These strategies made them (re)define and (re)confirm their academic positions and identities. However, the limited period for studying abroad reduced students’motivation to participate and engage in local activities and establish social networks with local residents and friends in the host society. Moreover, the public and academic colleagues’ limited understanding of the joint dual doctoral programmay not only negatively affect students’ academic mobility in terms of obtaining positions in the academic market but also influence prospective students’ willingness to participate in such programs. Moreover, this study provides constructive suggestions for the development of joint dual doctoral programs on the basis of students’ own practical experiences. Finally, the study’s limitations and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Keywords：Belgium, doctoral training, Taiwanese higher education, international student mobility, joint dual doctoral program