期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(1)三月刊（本期專題：語言與文化教育政策）
Directory
學習是為了義務或快樂：儒家文化脈絡下臺灣高中生學習滿足感的雙元取徑研究
作者:國立臺灣大學師資培育中心王秀槐、哥倫比亞大學教育學院林政佑
卷期：65卷第1期
日期：2020年3月
頁碼：271-296
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0011
摘要：
過去許多根據自我決定理論的研究皆指出，內在動機是促使學生努力學習、提高學習表現以及獲得滿足感的關鍵。然而，研究指出，包括臺灣在內的東亞儒家文化圈的國家中，基於盡責的外在動機也是激發學生投入學習的重要因素。為檢視這項理論上的歧義，本研究針對內、外在動機如何促動學習投入並引發不同滿足感，建構並驗證雙元學習動機的取徑。本研究針對511名高中生進行問卷調查，瞭解其學習動機、學習投入、學業表現，以及學習滿足感。經由結構方程式進行路徑分析與整體測量模式的配適度檢驗，本研究發現學生具有雙元的學習動機，並擁有兩種不同的心理滿足感。具體而言，基於個人興趣的內在動機需要透過「學習滿足感」預測學習投入，而基於個人盡責的外在動機能直接預測學習投入。無論內在或外在動機，受試者皆會因為學習投入而產生「道德滿足感」。研究結果對瞭解東亞儒家社會中學生的學習動機深具價值，本研究也進一步針對家庭與學校教育提出建議。
關鍵詞：儒家文化、努力投入、義務學習動機、興趣學習動機、自我決定理論
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- Chan, J. (1996). Chinese intelligence. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 93-108). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(12). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol7/iss1/12
- Chen, S.-W., & Wei, C.-Y. (2013). A two-factor model of learning motivation for Chinese undergraduates: On the function of academic identity and role identity. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 41-55. doi:10.6129/CJP.20120717
- Chen, S.-W., Wang, H.-H., Wei, C.-F., Fwu, B.-J., & Hwang, K.-K. (2009). Taiwanese students’ self-attributions for two types of achievement goals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 179-194. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.2.179-194
- Chiu, L.-H. (1988). Locus of control differences between American and Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(3), 411-413. doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9713759
» 展開更多
- Chan, J. (1996). Chinese intelligence. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 93-108). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Cassady, J. C. (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(12). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol7/iss1/12
- Chen, S.-W., & Wei, C.-Y. (2013). A two-factor model of learning motivation for Chinese undergraduates: On the function of academic identity and role identity. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 41-55. doi:10.6129/CJP.20120717
- Chen, S.-W., Wang, H.-H., Wei, C.-F., Fwu, B.-J., & Hwang, K.-K. (2009). Taiwanese students’ self-attributions for two types of achievement goals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(2), 179-194. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.2.179-194
- Chiu, L.-H. (1988). Locus of control differences between American and Chinese adolescents. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(3), 411-413. doi:10.1080/00224545.1988.9713759
- D’Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 84-96. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.84
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182-185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Self-determination. In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The corsini encyclopedia of psychology (pp. 1-2). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10. 1002/9780470479216.corpsy083
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 416-433). doi:10.4135/9781446249215.n21
- Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 165-183. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90013-8
- Fwu, B.-J., Wei, C.-F., Chen, S.-W., & Wang, H.-H. (2014). Effort counts: The moral significance of effort in the patterns of credit assignment on math learning in the Confucian cultural context. International Journal of Educational Development, 39, 157-162. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.07.010
- Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(2), 225-248. doi:10.1177/0022002186017002006
- Hofstede, G. (1983). The cultural relativity of organizational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75-89. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
- Huang, H.-T., Hsu, C.-C., & Chen, S.-W. (2015). Identification with social role obligations, possible selves, and L2 motivation in foreign language learning. System, 51, 28-38. doi:10.1016/j.sqstem.2015.03.003
- Iyengar, S. S., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1999). Independence from whom? Interdependence with whom? Cultural perspectives on ingroups versus outgroups. In D. A. Prentice & D. T. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 273-301). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.349
- Li, J. (2006). Self in learning: Chinese adolescents’ goals and sense of agency. Child Development, 77(2), 482-501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00883.x
- Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and west. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139028400
- Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Stanco, G. M. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. Amsterdam, NL: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
- Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, Y.-Y. (1999). Culture and the construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 701-717. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.701
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and Eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266-284. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1382
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Paris, France: Author.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). PISA 2015 results in focus. Paris, France: Author.
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2011). A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In V. I. Chirkov, R. M. Ryan, & K. M. Sheldon (Eds.), Human autonomy in cross-cultural context: Perspectives on the psychology of agency, freedom, and well-being (pp. 45-64). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
- Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397-427. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi:10. 1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York, NY: Touchstone Books.
- Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Uttal, D. H. (1997). Beliefs about genetic influences on mathematics achievement: A cross-cultural comparison. Genetica, 99(2-3), 165-272. doi:10.1007/BF02259520
- Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate: Competitive examination and their consequences. London, UK: Cassell.
Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(1)】March (Special Issue: Language and Culture Education Policies)
Directory
Learning for Duty or Enjoyment: Two Paths to Fulfillment in Learning for Taiwanese High School Students in the Confucian Cultural Context
Author: Hsiou-Huai Wang (Center for Teacher Education, National Taiwan University), Cheng-Yu Lin (Teacher College, Columbia University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 65, No.1
Date：March 2020
Pages：271-296
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0011
Abstract：
In the context of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), numerous published studies have argued that intrinsic motivation is the key to engaging students with their academic work, improving school performance, and acquiring psychological well-being. By contrast, an increasing body of research focusing on Eastern Asian Confucian societies, including Taiwan, has shed light on the salience of extrinsic motivation centered around role obligation and duty fulfillment. Scholars have argued that extrinsic motivation has a high value of encouraging students’ effort making, enhancing their academic performance and providing them with psychological fulfillment. To help settle this theoretical dissonance, this research constructed and validated the two learning paths of Taiwanese students, the first, learning for duty, and the second, learning for enjoyment. A self-developed questionnaire on students’ learning motivation, effort-making, academic performance, and acquired satisfaction was administered to 511 students in northern Taiwan. Structural equation modeling generated path analysis and model fit results that demonstrated that Taiwanese students possess two learning motivations followed by two types of psychological fulfillment. Specifically, intrinsic motivation based on personal interest predicted effort-making, with mediation of “learning satisfaction.” Extrinsic motivation based on duty fulfillment directly predicted effort-making. Furthermore, “obligation satisfaction” emerged as a result of effort-making, regardless of students’ different motivations. These findings regarding different learning motivations and satisfaction are valuable in reshaping the theoretical conception of learning motivation in a Confucian cultural setting. Relevant implications and suggestions for parenting and teaching are discussed.
Keywords：Confucian culture, effort-making, learning for duty, learning for enjoyment, self-determination theory