期刊目錄列表 - 65卷(2020) - 【教育科學研究期刊】65(1)三月刊（本期專題：語言與文化教育政策）
Directory
正向心態對初始興趣、維持興趣及動手做科學創作競賽學習價值之相關研究
作者:國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系陳育蒼、國立臺灣師範大學學習科學跨國頂尖研究中心戴凱欣
卷期：65卷第1期
日期：2020年3月
頁碼：247-270
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0010
摘要：
本研究旨在探討正向心態對初始興趣、維持興趣及動手做科學創作競賽學習價值之相關。本研究之研究樣本為動手做科技創作競賽之參與學生，該競賽要求學生須在早上設計及製作三隻仿生機械獸，並在下午進行接力與拔河競賽。本研究回收有效樣本197份，以結構方程模式進行驗證性因素分析與模型分析。研究對象有135位男學生（68.5%）和62位女學生（31.5%），九年級學生有91位（46.2%）和六年級學生有106位（53.8%）。結果顯示正向心態對初始興趣、維持興趣及動手做科學創作競賽學習價值呈顯著正相關。路徑係數分別為 .64、 .28、 .59、 .36與 .47，且具高效果量。研究結果指出，正向心態有助於個體初始興趣及維持興趣感受之產生，進而提升動手做科學創作競賽之學習價值。
關鍵詞：動手做、維持興趣、學習價值、正向心態、初始興趣
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0
- Ainley, M. (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood, and disposition. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 147-163). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50010-1
- Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411-428. doi:10. 1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1
- Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
- Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). A predictive study of learner attitudes toward open learning in a robotics class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 692-704. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9496-6
» 展開更多
- Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0
- Ainley, M. (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood, and disposition. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 147-163). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-012372545-5/50010-1
- Ainley, M., Hillman, K., & Hidi, S. (2002). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: Situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411-428. doi:10. 1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1
- Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133-148. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
- Avsec, S., Rihtarsic, D., & Kocijancic, S. (2014). A predictive study of learner attitudes toward open learning in a robotics class. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(5), 692-704. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9496-6
- Bacon, D. R. (2016). Reporting actual and perceived student learning in education research. Journal of Marketing Education, 38(1), 3-6. doi:10.1177/0273475316636732
- Boyce, C. J., Mishra, C., Halverson, K. L., & Thomas, A. K. (2014). Getting students outside: Using technology as a way to stimulate engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 815-826. doi:10.1007/s10956-014-9514-8
- Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Cachay, J., & Abele, E. (2012). Developing competencies for continuous improvement processes on the shop floor through learning factories－Conceptual design and empirical validation. Procedia CIRP, 3, 638-643. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.109
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student perceptions of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) content and careers. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 173-186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience: Steps toward enhancing the quality of life. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
- Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston, MA: Riverside.
- Dixon, M. L., & Christoff, K. (2014). The lateral prefrontal cortex and complex value-based learning and decision making. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 9-18. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev. 2014.04.011
- Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461. doi:10.2307/249524
- Durik, A. M., Shechter, O. G., Noh, M., Rozek, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utility value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39(1), 104-118. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
- Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. doi:10. 1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
- Elbeck, M., & Bacon, D. R. (2015). Toward universal definitions for direct and indirect assessment. Journal of Education for Business, 90(5), 278-283. doi:10.1080/08832323.2015.1034064
- Falk, R. F., & Miller, N. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
- Fan, S.-C., & Yu, K.-C. (2016). Core value and implementation of the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum in technology education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 153-183. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).06
- Flowerday, T., & Shell, D. F. (2015). Disentangling the effects of interest and choice on learning, engagement, and attitude. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 134-140. doi:10.1016/j. lindif.2015.05.003
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:10.2307/ 3151312
- Frank, M., Lavy, I., & Elata, D. (2003). Implementing the project-based learning approach in an academic engineering course. International Journal of Technology Design and Education, 13(3), 273-288. doi:10.1023/A:1026192113732
- Fulmer, S. M., & Tulis, M. (2013). Changes in interest and affect during a difficult reading task: Relationships with perceived difficulty and reading fluency. Learning and Instruction, 27, 11-20. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.001
- George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513-524. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
- Geukes, K., Mesagno, C., Hanrahan, S. J., & Kellmann, M. (2012). Testing an interactionist perspective on the relationship between personality traits and performance under public pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(3), 243-250. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011. 12.004
- Glogger-Frey, I., Fleischer, C., Grüny, L., Kappich, J., & Renkl, A. (2015). Inventing a solution and studying a worked solution prepare differently for learning from direct instruction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 72-87. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.001
- Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2013). Structural equation modeling: A second course. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105-122. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105
- Hershberger, S. L. (2003). The growth of structural equation modeling: 1994-2001. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 35-46. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_2
- Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571. doi:10.3102/00346543060004549
- Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
- Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The educational psychology series. Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89-115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Høgheim, S., & Reber, R. (2015). Supporting interest of middle school students in mathematics through context personalization and example choice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 17-25. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.006
- Hong, J.-C., Chen, M.-Y., & Hwang, M.-Y. (2013). Vitalizing creative learning in science and technology through an extracurricular club: A perspective based on activity theory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 45-55. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.06.001
- Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Szeto, E., Tai, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-R. (2016). Positive affect relevant to epistemic curiosity to reflect continuance intention to join a hands-on making contest. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2267-2279. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1276a
- Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
- Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410-1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
- Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880-895. doi:10.1037/a0019506
- Jetton, T. L., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Interest assessment and the content area literacy environment: Challenges for research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 13(3), 303-318. doi:10.1023/A:1016680023840
- Kanse, L. (2004). Recovery uncovered: How people in the chemical process industry recover from failures (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
- Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H. Y., & Crant, J. M. (2009). Proactive personality, employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(1), 93-103. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9094-4
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Knogler, M., Harackiewicz, J. M., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2015). How situational is situational interest? Investigating the longitudinal structure of situational interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 43, 39-50. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.08.004
- Law, K. M. Y., Lee, V. C. S., & Yu, Y. T. (2010). Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Computers & Education, 55(1), 218-228. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.007
- Lo, J. C. (2015). Developing participation through simulations: A multi-level analysis of situational interest on students’ commitment to vote. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 243-254. doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2015.06.008
- Loibl, K., & Rummel, N. (2014). The impact of guidance during problem-solving prior to instruction on students’ inventions and learning outcomes. Instructional Science, 42(3), 305-326. doi:10. 1007/s11251-013-9282-5
- MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5
- Morrison, E. W. (2006). Doing the job well: An investigation of pro-social rule breaking. Journal of Management, 32(1), 5-28. doi:10.1177/0149206305277790
- Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
- Muis, K. R., Psaradellis, C., Lajoie, S. P., Di Leo, I., & Chevrier, M. (2015). The role of epistemic emotions in mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 172-185. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.003
- Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662. doi:10.1177/0149206308321554
- Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
- Regueras, L. M., Verdú, E., Verdú, M. J., & de Castro, J. P. (2011). Design of a competitive and collaborative learning strategy in a communication networks course. IEEE Transaction of Education, 54(2), 302-307. doi:10.1109/TE.2010.2053933
- Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173-195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Rinninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
- Rochlin, I., Sarne, D., & Mash, M. (2014). Joint search with self-interested agents and the failure of cooperation enhancers. Artificial Intelligence, 214, 45-65. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2014.05.004
- Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). Problem-based learning and student motivation: The role of interest in learning and achievement. In G. O’Grady, E. H. J. Yew, K. P. L. Goh, & H. G. Schmidt (Eds.), One-day, one problem: An approach to problem-based learning (pp. 85-101). Singapore: Springer.
- Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58-67. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.001
- Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 32, 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002
- Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-222). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2202_1
- Shen, B., Chen, A., & Guan, J. (2007). Using achievement goals and interest to predict learning in physical education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(2), 89-108. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.2.89-108
- Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653-771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Vogler, J. S., Thompson, P., Davis, D. W., Mayfield, B. E., Finley, P. M., & Yasseri, D. (2018). The hard work of soft skills: Augmenting the project-based learning experience with interdisciplinary teamwork. Instructional Science, 46(3), 457-488. doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9438-9
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91-122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. The Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201. doi:10.2307/259118
Journal directory listing - Volume 65 (2020) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【65(1)】March (Special Issue: Language and Culture Education Policies)
Directory
Proactivity Affects Triggered and Maintained Situational Interest and Relates to Perceived Learning Values of Attending a Hands-on Making Contest
Author: Yu-Tsang Chen (Department of Industrial Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Kai-Hsin Tai (Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 65, No.1
Date：March 2020
Pages：247-270
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.202003_65(1).0010
Abstract：
This study explored how proactivity triggers and maintains the interest and perceived learning values of students. It surveyed students who participated in a science and technology hands-on making contest. This contest required students to make three miniatures and use them to compete in relay races and tug-of-war competitions. Data from 197 participants were collected analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis with structural equation modeling. Participants consisted of 135 (68.5%) male students and 62 (31.5%) female students. 91 participants were in the fifth grade (46.2%) and 106 were in the sixth grade (53.8%). Results identified positive correlations between proactivity, triggered interest, maintained interest, and perceived learning value. The coefficients were .64, .28, .59, .36, and .47, respectively, and the effect sizes were strong. These results indicated that although failure in miniature design is unavoidable, promoting students’ proactivity can reduce failure, facilitate situational interest, and ultimately enhance perceived learning values.
Keywords：hands-on making, maintained interest, perceived learning values, proactivity, triggered interest