期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(1)三月刊
Directory
國中學生面對網路謠言之回應行為初探：以Facebook謠言訊息為例
作者:國立交通大學教育研究所黃慧宜、國立交通大學教育研究所周倩
卷期：64卷第1期
日期：2019年3月
頁碼：149-180
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0006
摘要：
本研究以國中學生為對象，探討學生面對疑似網路謠言訊息時的態度與行為，希望藉此瞭解學生對於網路謠言訊息之因應方式，以提供教育工作者或未來研究者參考。本研究以問卷調查法進行，蒐集臺灣北、中、南部地區共578名國中學生樣本所填寫之問卷，研究結果如下：一、學生認為在所有常用的網路服務或網路媒介中，幾乎都能察覺網路謠言的存在；二、學生普遍具備尋找線索進行資訊可信度判斷的能力，也能區分不同線索的重要性，但卻不一定能夠利用這些線索正確判斷網路訊息的真偽；三、學生對於網路謠言的有趣性感受與可信度判斷評價有關，且不會因謠言類型的不同而產生改變；四、學生最常使用的網路謠言處理方式為「看看就算了」，大部分傾向不處理，不會主動查證、澄清，但通常也不會傳播謠言。此外，學生的處理行為也會依網路謠言訊息的類型而不同，如學生較常查證或澄清的是「恐懼型謠言」，較常傳播的則是「新奇型謠言」；五、學生較常使用「與同學、朋友、家人討論」等方便快速的方式進行網路資訊驗證，較少選擇費時但更能確保結果正確無誤的資訊驗證方式。
關鍵詞：資訊可信度、資訊驗證、網路謠言、臺灣國中學生
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 三民書局新辭典編纂委員會（主編）（1989）。新辭典。臺北巿：三民書局。
【San Min Dictionary Editorial Committee. (Ed.). (1989). New dictionary. Taipei, Taiwan: San Min.】
- 汪志堅、賴明政（2001）。消費者對電子佈告欄所流傳產品瑕疵謠言之態度。廣告學研究，16，31-54。 【Wang, C.-C., & Lai, M.-C. (2001). Consumers’ attitude to rumors on BBS. The Journal of Advertising & Public Relations, 16, 31-54.】
- 林羿妏、陳昭秀（2012）。大專院校生的批判思考意向與Facebook 特性對其資訊驗證行為的影響。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，8（1），17-36。doi:10.29506/JLASS.201203.0002 【Lin, Y.-W., & Chen, C.-H. (2012). College students’ Facebook use characteristics, critical-thinking tendencies, and information-verification behaviors. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 8(1), 17-36. doi:10.29506/JLASS. 201203.0002】
- 周琳達、劉嘉俊、朱倩（2011）。微博謠言傳播規律初探。青年記者，2011（5A），14-16。 【Zhou, L.-D., Liu, C.-J., & Zhou, Q. (2011). An exploratory study on Weibo rumor spread. Youth Journalist, 2011(5A), 14-16.】
- 洪雅慧（2006）。網路政治謠言之可信度以及轉寄行為研究：以「319槍擊疑雲」電子郵件散播為例。傳播管理學刊，7（1），137-159。 【Hong, Y.-H. (2006). A study of the credibility of internet political rumors and the behavior of forwarding the rumors: Take the diffusion of 319-assassination-related emails as an example. Journal of Communications Management, 7(1), 137-159.】
» 展開更多
- 三民書局新辭典編纂委員會（主編）（1989）。新辭典。臺北巿：三民書局。 【San Min Dictionary Editorial Committee. (Ed.). (1989). New dictionary. Taipei, Taiwan: San Min.】
- 汪志堅、賴明政（2001）。消費者對電子佈告欄所流傳產品瑕疵謠言之態度。廣告學研究，16，31-54。 【Wang, C.-C., & Lai, M.-C. (2001). Consumers’ attitude to rumors on BBS. The Journal of Advertising & Public Relations, 16, 31-54.】
- 林羿妏、陳昭秀（2012）。大專院校生的批判思考意向與Facebook 特性對其資訊驗證行為的影響。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，8（1），17-36。doi:10.29506/JLASS.201203.0002 【Lin, Y.-W., & Chen, C.-H. (2012). College students’ Facebook use characteristics, critical-thinking tendencies, and information-verification behaviors. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 8(1), 17-36. doi:10.29506/JLASS. 201203.0002】
- 周琳達、劉嘉俊、朱倩（2011）。微博謠言傳播規律初探。青年記者，2011（5A），14-16。 【Zhou, L.-D., Liu, C.-J., & Zhou, Q. (2011). An exploratory study on Weibo rumor spread. Youth Journalist, 2011(5A), 14-16.】
- 洪雅慧（2006）。網路政治謠言之可信度以及轉寄行為研究：以「319槍擊疑雲」電子郵件散播為例。傳播管理學刊，7（1），137-159。 【Hong, Y.-H. (2006). A study of the credibility of internet political rumors and the behavior of forwarding the rumors: Take the diffusion of 319-assassination-related emails as an example. Journal of Communications Management, 7(1), 137-159.】
- 唐亦芳（2007）。謠言澄清教學對國小四年級學童影響之初探─以Google為工具（未出版碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹巿。 【Tang, Y.-F. (2007). The effect of rumor distinguishing education on fourth grade primary school students − Using Google as the tool (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.】
- 許文怡、梁朝雲（2007）。訊息來源可信度、情感認同與涉入程度對大學生採信消費性網路謠言之影響。教育資料與圖書館學，45（1），99-120。 【Hsu, W.-Y., & Liang, C.-Y. (2007). The influence of source credibility, user’s affection and involvement on college student’s belief toward Internet rumors. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 45(1), 99-120.】
- 國家發展委員會（2015）。104年個人家戶數位機會調查報告。取自http://ws.ndc.gov.tw/ Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL2NrZmlsZS8wNDNkMDhjYy0yNDQwLTQyYWMtYmIyMC0zNDJjNTBkNmYwYjUucGRm&n=MTA05bm05YCL5Lq65a625oi25pW45L2N5qmf5pyD6Kq%2f5p%2bl5aCx5ZGKKGZpbmFsdjctMTA1MDUwOSkucGRm 【National Development Council. (2015). 2015 digital opportunity survey for individuals and households. Retrieved from http://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL2NrZmlsZS8wNDNkM DhjYy0yNDQwLTQyYWMtYmIyMC0zNDJjNTBkNmYwYjUucGRm&n=MTA05bm05YCL5Lq65a625oi25pW45L2N5qmf5pyD6Kq%2f5p%2bl5aCx5ZGKKGZpbmFsdjctMTA1MDUwOSkucGRm】
- 陶聖屏、張瑋礽（2008）。消費型網路謠言傳播行為研究：以大學生為例。復興崗學報，91，201-234。doi:10.29857/FHKAJ.200806.0009 【Tao, S.-P., & Chang, A.-N. (2008). A study of circulating consumer-related rumors behavior on the Internet: An example of college students. Fu Hsing Kang Academic Journal, 91, 201-234. doi:10.29857/FHKAJ.200806. 0009】
- 張鳳綿、歐陽誾（2010）。兒童網路謠言線上課程學習成效之研究。數位學習科技期刊，2（2），36-49。 【Chang, F.-M., & OuYang, Y. (2010). The effects of online course about Internet rumor for children. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 2(2), 36-49.】
- 黃葳威（2013）。2013台灣青少兒網路使用與價值觀調查報告。取自http://www.cyberangel. org.tw/thesis/Study/004.pdf 【Huang, W.-W. (2013). 2013 survey on Taiwan children’s adolescent’s online safety. Retrieved from http://www. cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/Study/004.pdf】
- 黃葳威（2014）。青少兒網路社群與數位智財權、個人隱私。取自http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/ thesis/Study/003.pdf 【Huang, W.-W. (2014). Children’s adolescent’s SNS use, digital intellectual property rights and online privacy. Retrieved from http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/Study/003.pdf】
- 黃葳威（2015）。2015台灣青少年網路使用與資訊分辨調查報告。取自http://www.cyberangel. org.tw/thesis/Study/002.pdf【Huang, W.-W. (2015). 2015 survey on Taiwan children’s adolescent’s Internet use and online information credibility evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/Study/002.pdf】
- 黃葳威（2016）。2016台灣青少兒網路社群、陌生網友分辨調查報告。取自http://www. cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/Study/001.pdf 【Huang, W.-W. (2016). 2016 survey on Taiwan children’s and adolescent’s SNS use and Internet friendship. Retrieved from http://www.cyberangel.org.tw/thesis/Study/001.pdf】
- 楊謹華（2008）。以同化對比理論探討謠言效果─正面及負面謠言（未出版碩士論文）。義守大學，高雄巿。 【Yang, C.-H. (2008). Assimilation-contrast theory on the rumor effect: Positive and negative rumors (Unpublished master’s thesis). I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.】
- 劉莉秋（2002）。散佈電子郵件謠言因素研究─以電腦中介人際互動觀點分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。 【Liu, L.-C. (2002). A study of diffusion e-mail rumor of influence factors: A view of computer-mediated personal interaction (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.】
- 鄭凱元（2006）。網路口碑傳播媒介之比較（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣科技大學，臺北巿。 【Cheng, K.-Y. (2006). An exploratory research comparing the differences of online word-of-mouth communication media (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- Kapferer, J. N. (1992)。謠言（鄭若麟、邊芹，譯）。臺北巿：桂冠。（原著出版於1990年） 【Kapferer, J. N. (1992). Rumors: Uses, interpretations, and images (R.-L. Cheng & C. Bien, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Lauréat. (Original work published 1990)】
- Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
- Baildon, M., & Damico, J. S. (2009). How do we know? Students examine issues of credibility with a complicated multimodal Web-based text. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(2), 265-285. doi:10.1111/j. 1467-873X.2009.00443.x
- Bordia, P., & DiFonzo, N. (2004). Problem solving in social interactions on the Internet: Rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(1), 33-49. doi:10.1177/019027250406700105
- Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1998). Rumor rest stops on the information highway: Transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research, 25(2), 163- 179. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00441.x
- Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the Web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49(3), 441-453.
- DiFonzo, N., Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Reining in rumors. Organizational Dynamics, 23(1), 47-62. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(94)90087-6
- Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2003). The perceived credibility of personal Web page information as influenced by the sex of the source. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 683-701. doi:10. 1016/S0747-5632(03)00021-9
- Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., …Treinen, M. (2001). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In J. A. Jacko, A. Sears, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & R. J. K. Jacob (Eds.), Proceedings of the CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference (pp. 61-68). Seattle, WA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/365024.365037
- Francke, H., Sundin, O., & Limberg, L. (2011). Debating credibility: The shaping of information literacies in upper secondary school. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 675-694. doi:10.1108/ 00220411111145043
- Freeman, K. S., & Spyridakis, J. H. (2004). An examination of factors that affect the credibility of online health information. Technical Communication, 51(2), 239-263.
- Hocevar, K. P., Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2014). Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 254-262. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.020
- Huang, H. (2017). A war of (mis)information: The political effects of rumors and rumor rebuttals in an authoritarian country. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 283-311. doi:10.1017/ S0007123415000253
- Iyer, E. S., & Debevec, K. (1991). Origin of rumor and tone of message in rumor quelling strategies. Psychology & Marketing, 8(3), 161-175. doi:10.1002/mar.4220080303
- Julien, H., & Barker, S. (2009). How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: A basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 12-17. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.008
- Jung, E. H., Walsh-Childers, K., & Kim, H.-S. (2016). Factors influencing the perceived credibility of diet-nutrition information Web sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 37-47. doi:10.1016/ j.chb.2015.11.044
- Knapp, R. H. (1944). A psychology of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly, 8(1), 22-37. doi:10.1086/ 265665
- Liu, Z. (2004). Perceptions of credibility of scholarly information on the Web. Information Processing & Management, 40(6), 1027-1038. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(03)00064-5
- Lorenzen, M. (2001). The land of confusion? High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research Strategies, 18(2), 151-163. doi:10.1016/S0734-3310(02)00074-5
- MacDougall, R. (2005). Identity, electronic ethos, and blogs: A technologic analysis of symbolic exchange on the new news medium. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(4), 575-599. doi:10. 1177/0002764205280922
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (n.d.). Rumor. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/ dictionary/rumor
- Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2013). Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 210-220. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013. 07.012
- Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2015). Psychological approaches to credibility assessment online. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 445-466). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118426456.ch20
- Nejati, M., Asadian, A., & Zehtabi, M. (2010). Rumors and their impacts within the city. Technics Technologies Education Management, 5(2), 354-359.
- Oechslein, O., & Hess, T. (2014). The value of a recommendation: The role of social ties in social recommender systems. In IEEE Computer Society (Ed.), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 1864-1873), Waikoloa, HI. doi:10.1109/HICSS. 2014.235
- Oxford Living Dictionaries. (n.d.). Rumour. Retrieved from http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ english/rumour#m_en_gb0723590
- Pezzo, M. V., & Beckstead, J. W. (2006). A multilevel analysis of rumor transmission: Effects of anxiety and belief in two field experiments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28(1), 91-100. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2801_8
- Radlick, M. (2002). Do they know what they are downloading? A study of how people determine the validity of information from the Internet (Unpublished master’s thesis). Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI.
- Rains, S. A., & Brunner, S. R. (2015). What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media and Society, 17(1), 114-131. doi:10.1177/1461444814546481
- Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S. L. (2010). Content versus source cue information as a basis for credibility judgments: The impact of task involvement. Social Psychology, 41(2), 93-104. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000014
- Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Inside rumor: A personal journey. American Psychologist, 46(5), 484-496. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.5.484
- Savolainen, R. (2011). Judging the quality and credibility of information in Internet discussion forums. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1243-1256. doi:10.1002/asi.21546
- Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2017). Political rumoring on Twitter during the 2012 US presidential election: Rumor diffusion and correction. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1214-1235. doi:10.1177/1461444816634054
- Simon, T., Goldberg, A., Leykin, D., & Adini, B. (2016). Kidnapping WhatsApp − Rumors during the search and rescue operation of three kidnapped youth. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 183-190. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.058
- Stoycheff, E., Liu, J., Wibowo, K. A., & Nanni, D. P. (2017). What have we learned about social media by studying Facebook? A decade in review. New Media & Society, 19(6), 968-980. doi:10.1177/1461444817695745
- Sundin, O., & Francke, H. (2009). In search of credibility: Pupils’ information practices in learning environments. Information Research, 14(4). Retrieved from http://informationr.net/ir/14-4/ paper418.html
- Takayasu, M., Sato, K., Sano, Y., Yamada, K., Misua, W., & Takayasu, H. (2015). Rumor diffusion and convergence during the 3.11 earthquake: A Twitter case study. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0121443. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121443
- Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52, 234-246. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.003
- Watson, C. (2014). An exploratory study of secondary students’ judgments of the relevance and reliability of information. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1385-1408. doi:10.1002/asi.23067
- Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D., & Graham, L. T. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203-220. doi:10.1177/1745691612442904
- Zhang, Z., Zhang, Z., & Li, H. (2015). Predictors of the authenticity of Internet health rumours. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 32(3), 195-205. doi:10.1111/hir.12115
Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(1)】March
Directory
Responses of Junior High School Students to Internet Rumors: A Case Study of Facebook Posts
Author: Hui-I Huang(Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University), Chien Chou(Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.1
Date：March 2019
Pages：149-180
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201903_64(1).0006
Abstract：
This study aimed to explore and understand how junior high school students evaluate the credibility of online rumors, thereby helping educators and researchers to better understand their responses related to Internet rumors and their information evaluation behavior. The results were obtained from a survey of junior high school students in Taiwan (N = 578), which are as follows: (1) The students were aware of the Internet rumors appearing on the commonly used network services. (2) The students understood the process of evaluating the information obtained through online platforms; however, they lacked the ability of accurate and effective evaluation. (3) The personal interest of the students toward Internet rumors was related to the credibility evaluation process, and their evaluation remained unchanged when they encountered different types of rumors. (4) The students did not respond positively to Internet rumors or identify and clarify these rumors. They did not spread these rumors either. Students would use different approaches based on the type of rumors. For example, students were more likely to identify or clear bogie rumors and spread curiosity rumors. (5) The students eager to evaluate the credibility of online information would use faster and easier approaches, such as discussing the rumor with their classmates, friends, or family instead of using time-consuming but effective approaches.
Keywords：information credibility, information evaluation, Internet rumors, Taiwan junior high school students