期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(2)六月刊（本期專題：數位學習的回顧與展望）
Directory
（專題）線上閱讀研究之回顧與展望
作者:劉宜芳(新北市育林國小)、柯華葳(國立中央大學學習與教學研究所)
卷期：62卷第2期
日期：2017年6月
頁碼：61-87
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).03
摘要：
隨著網路的普及，線上閱讀已成為重要的生活與工作能力，其內涵複合了閱讀與資訊及通訊技術（ICT）操作，並以搜尋、評估與整合為關鍵能力。我國及許多先進國家與國際評量均已著手推動線上閱讀相關的教育政策。本文以評量研究為基礎，回顧網路興起前後，資訊、資訊及通訊技術與閱讀素養衍生的定義變革，綜觀近20年線上閱讀能力的研究發現，與國內中文線上閱讀相關研究，提出對未來教育與研究的展望，以期深耕國內線上閱讀教育，培養未來公民所需的能力。文獻回顧發現，國內、外研究皆顯示五到九年級學生之搜尋、評估與整合能力的表現不甚理想，且整合能力之發展有以搜尋與評估能力為基礎之趨勢。而中、小學生線上中文閱讀教學與學習困難的研究，在我國仍算少數。本文建議，未來教學研究可朝探究學生學習中文線上閱讀的困境、開發學習輔具與發展教材；教育政策面向則建議加強上述項目的教師專業培育，以及於國小高年級階段增設相關的學習指標，以利培養學生線上閱讀素養。
關鍵詞：中小學、評估行為、網路搜尋、線上閱讀、整合能力
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王詩妮、吳東光、孟瑛如（2014）。多媒體註解轉助低閱讀能力學生線上閱讀理解之成效研究。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，10（4），333-352。【Wang, S.-N., Wu, T.-K., & Meng, Y.-R. (2014). Study on the effects of using multimedia annotations to assist on-line reading comprehension for students with low reading abilities. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 10(4), 333-352.】
- 台灣網路資訊中心（2015）。2015年台灣寬頻使用調查報告。取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/ download/200307/20150901e.pdf【Taiwan Network Information Center. (2015). 2015 the report of network using in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20150901e.pdf】
- 何雯婷、歐陽崇榮（2013）。國立公共資訊圖書館電子書服務平台使用者滿意度之研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，31（2），60-76。【Ho, W.-T., & Ouyang, J.-C. (2013). A study on user satisfaction of national library of public information e-Book online service. Bulletin of the Taipei Public Library Quarterly, 31(2), 60-76.】
- 吳明德、陳世娟、謝孟君（2005）。小學教師網際網路教學資源尋求及使用行為之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，42（4），481-498。【Wu, M.-D., Chen, S.-C., & Hsieh, M.-C. (2005). A study of elementary school teachers’ searching behavior for instructional resources on the Internet. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 42(4), 481-498.】
- 周世傑、吳政穎（2009）。利用相關回饋建立概念化的使用者興趣檔以協助使用者進行網頁查詢。資訊管理學報，16，83-96。【Chou, S.-C., & Wu, C.-G. (2009). Applying relevance feedback to develop the conceptual user profile to assist the user in web search. Journal of Information Management, 16, 83-96.】
» 展開更多
- 王詩妮、吳東光、孟瑛如（2014）。多媒體註解轉助低閱讀能力學生線上閱讀理解之成效研究。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，10（4），333-352。【Wang, S.-N., Wu, T.-K., & Meng, Y.-R. (2014). Study on the effects of using multimedia annotations to assist on-line reading comprehension for students with low reading abilities. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 10(4), 333-352.】
- 台灣網路資訊中心（2015）。2015年台灣寬頻使用調查報告。取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/ download/200307/20150901e.pdf【Taiwan Network Information Center. (2015). 2015 the report of network using in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20150901e.pdf】
- 何雯婷、歐陽崇榮（2013）。國立公共資訊圖書館電子書服務平台使用者滿意度之研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，31（2），60-76。【Ho, W.-T., & Ouyang, J.-C. (2013). A study on user satisfaction of national library of public information e-Book online service. Bulletin of the Taipei Public Library Quarterly, 31(2), 60-76.】
- 吳明德、陳世娟、謝孟君（2005）。小學教師網際網路教學資源尋求及使用行為之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，42（4），481-498。【Wu, M.-D., Chen, S.-C., & Hsieh, M.-C. (2005). A study of elementary school teachers’ searching behavior for instructional resources on the Internet. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 42(4), 481-498.】
- 周世傑、吳政穎（2009）。利用相關回饋建立概念化的使用者興趣檔以協助使用者進行網頁查詢。資訊管理學報，16，83-96。【Chou, S.-C., & Wu, C.-G. (2009). Applying relevance feedback to develop the conceptual user profile to assist the user in web search. Journal of Information Management, 16, 83-96.】
- 周智勳、丁泓丞（2013）。基於關聯度指標之網路文件語意分析與文句摘要。資訊科技與應用期刊，7（3），89-94。【Chou, C.-H., & Ding, H.-C. (2013). Semantic analysis and text mining of web documents basing on the relation indices. Journal of Information Technology and Applications, 7(3), 89-94.】
- 岳修平、王雅文、鄧雅婷、林維真、王友俊（2009）。網路化中文成語教學系統研發建置與可使用性評估研究。數位學習科技期刊，1（2），127-139。【Yueh, H.-P., Wang, Y.-W., Teng, Y.-T., Lin, W.-J., & Wang, Y.-C. (2009). Constructing a web-based Chinese idiom instructional system and usability study. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 1(2), 127-139.】
- 岳修平、林維真（2000）。農校學生電腦素養與網路化農業資訊應用之研究。科學教育學刊，8（4），317-333。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2000.0804.01【Yueh, H.-P., & Lin, W.-C. (2000). Investigating agricultural vocational school students’ computer literacy and their use of web-based agricultural information. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 317-333. doi:10. 6173/CJSE.2000.0804.01】
- 林尹千、洪碧霞（2012）。國中學生社會領域線上閱讀素養評量工具之發展。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，8（2），157-188。【Lin, Y.-C., & Hung, P.-H. (2010). Development of an electronic reading assessment on social studies for junior high school students. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 8(2), 157-188.】
- 林珊如（2003）。大學教師網路閱讀行為之初探。圖書資訊學刊，1（1），75-92。doi:10.6182/ jlis.2003.1(1).075【Lin Chang, S.-J. (2003). An exploratory study on e-reading behaviors of academic faculty. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 1(1), 75-92. doi:10.6182/jlis.2003.1(1).075】
- 林珊如（2010）。數位時代的閱讀：青少年網路閱讀的爭議與未來。圖書資訊學刊，8（2），29-53。doi:10.6182/jlis.2010.8(2).029【Lin Chang, S.-J. (2010). Reading in a digital age: Issues and future of reading on the web among young people. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 8(2), 29-53. doi:10.6182/jlis.2010.8(2).029】
- 林淑芳（2016）。青少年網路素養、家長介入、與網路使用經驗。中華傳播學刊，30，3-29。doi:10.6195/cjcr.2016.30.01【Lin, S.-F. (2016). Relationship between internet literacy and parental mediation in taiwanese adolescents. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 30, 3-29. doi:10.6195/cjcr.2016.30.01】
- 邱嘉慧、游媛淇（2013）。線上摘要撰寫系統之成效：從不同閱讀程度之英語學習者來看。東吳外語學報，37，35-65。【Chiu, C.-H., & Yu, Y.-C. (2013). Effects of online summary writing for EFL readers at different levels. Soochow Journal of Foreign Languages and Literatures, 37, 35-65.】
- 施弼耀（2006）。線上動態英語閱讀學習平台建置與使用接受度評估。屏東教育大學學報，24，521-554。【Shih, B.-Y. (2006). The research of the development of an on-line English reading environment and acceptance evaluation. Journal of Pingtung University of Education, 24, 521-554.】
- 洪兆祥、陳柏霖、余民寧（2015）。網路閱讀策略量表之測量恆等性檢驗。教育資料與圖書館學，52（4），389-415。doi:10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.524/0024.RS.BM【Hung, C.-H., Chen, P.-L., & Yu, M.-N. (2015). A study of measurement invariance on e-reading strategy scale. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 52(4), 389-415. doi:10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.524/0024.RS. BM】
- 翁婉真、黃慕萱（2004）。國小高年級學生網路資訊尋求行為之研究。大學圖書館，8（1），92-106。【Weng, W.-C., & Huang, M.-H. (2004). An empirical study of Internet information behavior of elementary school students in their senior years. University Library Quarterly, 8(1), 92-106.】
- 張介耀、蔡德謙、黃俊捷（2014）。雲林縣國中生網路使用現況、網路素養與網路態度之相關性研究。元培學報，21，57-74。【Chang, C.-Y., Tsaih, D.-C., & Huang, C.-C. (2014). The study of relationship about internet use situation, internet knowledge, and Internet attitude for Yunlin county junior high school student. Journal of Yuanpei University of Science and Technology, 21, 57-74.】
- 張陳基（2002）。整合式資訊檢索介面的設計與實作。大學圖書館，6（1），82-93。【Chang, C.-C. (2002). The design and implementation of integrated interface for information retrieval system in libraries. University Library Quarterly, 6(1), 82-93.】
- 張貴琳（2012）。國中學生線上閱讀素養發展現況調查。教育研究與發展期刊，8（2），87-118。【Chang, K.-L. (2012). The survey of junior high school students online reading literacy. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 8(2), 87-118.】
- 張貴琳（2014）。青少年線上閱讀素養表現之關聯變項探討。市北教育學刊，45，29-68。【Chang, K.-L. (2014). Impact of contextual factors on adolescents’ online reading literacy. Journal of Education of Taipei Municipal University of Education, 45, 29-68.】
- 教育部（2008）。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2008). White paper: Information literacy education. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 教育部（2014）。103年中華民國師資培育統計年報。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2014). 2014 annual report of teacher education in the Republic of China. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 陳柏霖、洪兆祥、余民寧（2013）。網路閱讀態度、網路閱讀行為及網路閱讀素養之橫斷面研究。教育科學研究期刊，58（3），23-50。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).02 【Chen, P.-L., Hung, C.-H., & Yu, M.-N. (2013). Cross-sectional study of the relationships among e-reading attitude, e-reading behavior, and e-reading literacy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(3), 23-50. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).02】
- 陳世娟、邵婉卿（2015）。臺灣成年民眾數位閱讀載具與閱讀行為之現況調查。大學圖書館，19（1），41-69。doi:10.6146/univj.19-1.03【Chen, S.-C., & Shaw, W.-C. (2015). A survey of the Taiwanese adults’ digital reading devices and behavior. University Library Quarterly, 19(1), 41-69. doi:10.6146/univj.19-1.03】
- 陳志銘、韋祿恩、吳志豪（2011）。認知型態與標註品質對閱讀成效之影響與關聯研究：以數位閱讀標註系統為例。圖書與資訊學刊，76，1-25。【Chen, C.-M., Wei, L.-E., & Wu, J.-H. (2011). Assessing the effects of cognitive style and annotation quality to reading. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 76, 1-25.】
- 陳林志、許富翔、劉英和、陳大仁（2011）。利用LSA與GA之線上新聞查詢建議。電子商務研究，9（3），295-321。【Chen, L.-C., Hsu, F.-H., Liu, Y.-H., & Chen, D.-R. (2011). Online news query suggestion using LSA and GA. Electronic Commerce Studies, 9(3), 295-321.】
- 陳淑滿（2013）。輔英學生網路文學閱讀行為之研究─以現代詩網站為範疇。正修通識教育學報，10，167-191。【Chen, S.-M. (2013). The study for reading behavior of modern poetry website in Fooyin university. Journal of Cheng-Shiu University for General Education, 10, 167-191.】
- 黃文琪、吳明德（2008）。學者研究歷程中之電子期刊使用研究─以電機資訊學院教師為例。大學圖書館，12（1），22-42。【Huang, W.-C., & Wu, M.-D. (2008). A study of E-journal use in the research process. University Library Quarterly, 12(1), 22-42.】
- 黃國禎、郭凡瑞、蔡新德（2009）。概念構圖教學策略對國小學童線上資料搜尋能力及知識結構的影響─以自然科課程為例。科學教育學刊，17（5），367-385。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2009. 1705.01【Hwang, G.-J., Kuo, F.-R., & Tsai, H.-T. (2009). Effects of concept map-oriented tutoring strategies on web-searching ability and knowledge structures of elementary school students: A case study in a natural science course. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 367-385. doi:10.6173/CJSE.2009.1705.01】
- 劉宜芳、柯華葳（2014）。國小學生線上閱讀素養測驗之編製與線上閱讀能力表現之初探。測驗學刊，61（4），509-532。【Liu, I.-F., & Ko, H.-W. (2014). Developing online reading skill test to assess elementary students’ online reading performance, information processing and economic theories. Psychological Testing, 61(4), 509-532.】
- 廖則竣、陶蓓麗、陳志成（2005）。網路資訊搜尋行為之整合模式：以心理動機、資訊處理及資訊經濟理論為基礎之研究。資訊管理學報，12（3），223-245。【Liao, C.-C., To, P.-L., & Chen, C.-C. (2005). An integrated model of information search behavior on internet: Based on psychological/motivational, information processing and economic theories. Journal of Information Management, 12(3), 223-245.】
- 劉遠楨、黃思華、王聖仁（2008）。結合概念構圖與註記分享線上摘要之寫作學習環境之研究。課程與教學，11（3），155-180。【Liu, Y.-C., Huang, T.-H., & Wang, S.-R. (2008). A study on online learning environment for summary writing integrating concept map and note sharing. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 11(3), 155-180.】
- 歐陽誾（2010）。國小學生網路安全素養現況及相關影響因素之調查研究。教育學誌，23，1-36。【Ouyang, Y. (2010). A survey study on the factors impacting the Internet safety literacy of elementary students. Journal of Education, 23, 1-36.】
- 羅家駿、曹忠學、葉修文（2005）。電子文件之線上註記系統發展與閱讀教學應用。中原學報，33（2），193-214。【Lo, J.-J., Tsao, C.-H., & Yeh, S.-W. (2005). Using online annotations to facilitate reading: System development and empirical studies. Chung Yuan Journal, 33(2), 193-214.】
- 龔琴勛、鄭永熏（2016）。國中生網路素養、同儕關係與網路安全認知之相關研究。教育傳播與科技研究，114，61-79。doi:10.6137/RECT.2016.114.04【Kung, C.-H., & Cheng, Y.-H. (2016). A study of correlations between internet literacy, peer relationship and knowledge of Internet safety among junior high school students. Research of Educational Communications and Technology, 114, 61-79. doi:10.6137/ RECT.2016.114.04】
- Accenture, Markle Foundation, & United Nations Development Programme. (2001). Creating a development dynamic: Final report of the digital opportunity initiative. Retrieved from http://www. opt-init.org/framework/DOI- Final-Report.pdf
- Adams, M. J., & Collins, A. (1977). A schema-theoretic view of reading (Technical Report No. 32). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED142971
- Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (OECD Education Working Papers No. 41). Retrieved from http:// www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/21st-century-skills-and-competences-for-new-millennium-learners-in-oecd-countries_218525261154
- Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 5-22). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_1
- Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64-76. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
- Aula, A., Jhaveri, N., & Käki, M. (2005). Information search and re-access strategies of experienced web users. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1060831
- Banks, K. (2016). Information and communication technology literacy and employability: Exploring workforce readiness and employer expectations in the Atlanta region healthcare industry. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1522&context=gsurc
- Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College and Research Libraries, 55(4), 309-322. doi:10.5860/crl_55_04-309
- Beitzel, S. M., Jensen, E. C., Chowdhury, A., Grossman, D., & Frieder, O. (2004). Hourly analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log. In K. Järevlin, J. Allan, & P. Bruze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 321-328). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/ 1008992.1009048
- Beymer, D., Russell, D., & Orton, P. (2008). An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1531831
- Bilal, D. (2000). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 646-665. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:7<646::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-A
- Bilal, D. (2001). Children’s use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 118-136. doi:10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1038>3.0.CO: 2-R
- Braasch, J. L. G., Lawless, K. A., Goldman, S. R., Manning, F. H., Gomez, K. W., & MacLeod, S. M. (2009). Evaluating search results: An empirical analysis of middle school students’ use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(1), 63-82. doi:10.2190/EC.41.1.c
- Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6-28. doi:10.1598/RRQ.44.1.1
- Briggs, P., Burford, B., De Angeli, A., & Lynch, P. (2002). Trust in online advice. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 321-332. doi:10.1177/089443930202000309
- Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485-522. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
- Chien, T.-C., Chen, Z.-H., Ko, H.-W., Ku, Y.-M., & Chan, T.-W. (2015). My-bookstore using information technology to support children’s classroom reading and book recommendation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 455-474. doi:10.1177/0735633115571920
- Clarke, A., & Englebright, L. (2003). ICT: The new basic skill. Leicester, UK: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education NIACE.
- Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
- Coiro, J., & Kennedy C., (2011). The online reading comprehension assessment (ORCA) project: Preparing students for common core standards and 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/931282/Coiro_J._and_Kennedy_C._2011_._The_online_reading_comprehension_assessment_ORCA_project_Preparing_students_for_common_core_standards_and_21st_century_literacies._White_paper_based_on_work_supported_by_the_United_States_Department_of_Education_under_Award_No._R305G050154_and_R305A090608
- Coiro, J., Coscarelli, C., Maykel, C., & Forzani, E. (2015). Investigating criteria that seventh graders use to evaluate the quality of online information. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 287-297. doi:10.1002/jaal.448
- D’Ambra, J., & Rice, R. E. (2001). Emerging factors in user evaluation of the world wide web. Information & Management, 38(6), 373-384. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00077-X
- Dias, P., Gomes, M. J., & Correia, A. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 93-117. doi:10.2190/G8C5-342V-DJX3-Q53F
- Diviani, N., van den Putte, B., Giani, S., & van Weert, J. C. M. (2015). Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), [e112]. doi:10.2196/jmir.4018
- Eisenberg, M. B. (2010). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39-47. doi:10.14429/djlit.28.2.166
- Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Sa, E.-R. (2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: A systematic review. JAMA, 287(20), 2691-2700. doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2691
- Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielsen, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2002). How do people evaluate a web site’s credibility? Retrieved from http://simson.net/ref/2002/stanfordPTL.pdf
- Fraillon, J., Schulz, W., & Ainley, J. (2013). International computer and information literacy study: Assessment framework. Retrieved from https://works.bepress. com/john_ainley/170/
- Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H. I. (2010). Summary versus argument tasks when working with multiple documents: Which is better for whom? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 157-173. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.11.002
- Gossen, T., & Nürnberger, A. (2013). Specifics of information retrieval for young users: A survey. Information Processing & Management, 49(4), 739-756. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.12.006
- Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371-395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
- Hirsh, S. G. (1999). Children’s relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(14), 1265-1283. doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1097-4571(1999)50:14<1265::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-E
- International ICT Literacy Panel. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/Information_and_Communication_Technology_ Literacy/ictreport.pdf
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). The national educational technology standards and performance indicators for students. Eugene, OR: Author.
- Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management, 36(2), 207-227. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00056-4
- Jenkins, C., Corritore, C. L., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). Patterns of information seeking on the web: A qualitative study of domain expertise and web expertise. IT & Society, 1(3), 64-89.
- Johnson, P. (2009). The 21st century skills movement. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 11.
- Judd, V. C., Farrow, L. I., & Tims, B. J. (2006). Evaluating public web site information: A process and an instrument. Reference Services Review, 34(1), 12-32. doi:10.1108/00907320510631571
- Kammerer, Y., & Bohnacker, M. (2012). Children’s web search with Google: The effectiveness of natural language queries. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d45/c67bb774529 cd4eae7aa19be1d9a7b0c34ec.pdf?_ga=2.245462471.215935499.1496823977-1546836580.1496722006
- Katz, I. R. (2007). ETS research finds college students fall short in demonstrating ICT literacy National Policy Council to create national standards. College & Research Libraries News, 68(1), 35-37.
- Katz, I. R. (2013). Testing information literacy in digital environments: ETS’s iSkills assessment. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(3), 3-12. doi:10.6017/ital.v26i3.3271
- Kiili, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Students evaluating Internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(1), 75-95. doi: 10.2190/EC.39.1.e
- Kim, K.-S., & Allen, B. (2002). Cognitive and task influences on web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 109-119. doi:10.1002/ asi.10014
- Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
- Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363-394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
- Kroustallaki, D., Kokkinaki, T., Sideridis, G. D., & Simos, P. G. (2015). Exploring students’ affect and achievement goals in the context of an intervention to improve web searching skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 156-170. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.060
- Kuhlthau, C. C. (1987). Information skills for an information society: A review of research an ERIC information analysis product. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED297740)
- Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2008). Students’ use of web literacy skills and strategies: Searching, reading and evaluating web information. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 13(3). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ837273
- Lazonder, A. W., Biemans, H. J. A., & Wopereis, I. G. J. H. (2000). Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the world wide web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 576-581. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:6<576:: AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-7
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L., & Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and Processes of Reading (5th ed., pp.1570-1613. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712. doi:10.1108/00220410510632040
- Liu, I-F., Ko, H.-W., & Wu, S.-Y. (2014). Learning reading strategies with online discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(2), 231-247. doi:10.2190/EC.50.2.e
- Lowe, G. S., & MacAuley, J. (2000). Information and communication technology literacy assessment framework. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Madden, A. D., Ford, N. J., Miller, D., & Levy, P. (2006). Children’s use of the Internet for information-seeking. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 744-761. doi:10.1108/00220410610714958
- Marchionini, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1988). Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. Computer, 21(1), 70-80. doi:10.1109/2.222119
- Markauskaite, L. (2006). Towards an integrated analytical framework of information and communications technology literacy: From intended to implemented and achieved dimensions. Information Research, 11(3). Retrieved from http://ictlogy.net/bibliography/reports/projects. php?idp=587
- Mayer, R. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816819
- Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078-2091. doi:10.1002/asi.20672
- Monchaux, S., Amadieu, F., Chevalier, A., & Mariné, C. (2015). Query strategies during information searching: Effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved. Information Processing & Management, 51(5), 557-569. doi:10.1016/j. ipm.2015.05.004
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Sainsbury, M. (2013). PIRLS 2016 assessment framework. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
- Murray, J. (2008). Looking at ICT Literacy Standards. Library Media Connection, 38-42.
- Nolan, T., & Humphrys, M. (2015). Problems with Internet and library usage for secondary school children. The ITB Journal, 4(2), 118-151.
- Noordman, L. G. M., Vonk, W., & Kempff, H. J. (1992). Causal inferences during the reading of expository texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(5), 573-590. doi:10.1016/0749-596X (92)90029-W
- Online Reading Comprehension Assessment. (2016, January 23). Understanding the new literacies of online reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www.orca.uconn.edu/professional- development/show-me/show-me-overview/
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). PISA 2009 Results: Students on Line: Digital Technologies and Performance (Volume VI). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10. 1787/9789264112995-en
- Pedley, P. (2001). The information professional of the 21st century. Managing Information, 8(7), 8-9.
- Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470757642.ch13
- Quadri, G. (2012). Impact of ICT skills on the use of e-resources by information professionals: A review of related literature. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal). Retrieved from http:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/762
- Rodicio, H. G. (2015). Students’ evaluation strategies in a web research task: Are they sensitive to relevance and reliability? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 27(2), 134-157. doi:10. 1007/s12528-015-9098-1
- Rose, E. (2011). The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students’ lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 515-526. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8535.2009.01043.x
- Rouet, J.-F., Ros, C., Goumi, A., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Dinet, J. (2011). The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students’ assessment of relevance in web menus. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 205-219. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.007
- Rouet, J.-F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 389-406. doi:10.1002/acp.1415
- Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 171-191. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4003_1
- Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & Mcgee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 77-93. doi:10.2190/JE7W-VL6W-RNYF-RD4M
- Selfe, C. L., & Hawisher, G. E. (2002). A historical look at electronic literacy: Implications for the education of technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16(3), 231-276. doi:10.1177/1050651902016003001
- Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430-456. doi:10.1598/RRQ31.4.5
- Storrer, A. (2002). Coherence in text and hypertext. Document Design, 3(2), 156-168. doi:10.1075/ dd.3.2.06sto
- Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Dimensions of topic-specific epistemological beliefs as predictors of multiple text understanding. Learning and Instruction, 18(6), 513-527. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.11.001
- Sun, C.-T., Ye, S.-H., & Hsieh, H.-C. (2014). Effects of student characteristics and question design on Internet search results usage in a Taiwanese classroom. Computers & Education, 77, 134- 144. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.020
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Huang, J.-S. (2008). Improving children’s reading comprehension and use of strategies through computer-based strategy training. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1552-1571. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.009
- Tauscher, L., & Greenberg, S. (1997). Revisitation patterns in world wide web navigation. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 399-406). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/258549.258816
- Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J. M. (2005). How users assess web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(4), 327-344. doi:10.1002/asi.20106
- Tsai, M.-J. (2009). Online Information Searching Strategy Inventory (OISSI): A quick version and a complete version. Computers & Education, 53(2), 473-483. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.006
- Urakami, J., & Krems, J. F. (2012). How hypertext reading sequences affect understanding of causal and temporal relations in story comprehension. Instructional Science, 40(2), 277-295. doi:10. 1007/s11251-011-9178-1
- Vibert, N., Ros, C., Bigot, L. L., Ramond, M., Gatefin, J., & Rouet, J.-F. (2009). Effects of domain knowledge on reference search with the PubMed database: An experimental study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1423-1447. doi:10.1002/ asi.21078
- Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75-104. doi:10.1207/ s15327809jls0901_5
- Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52(1), 234-246.
- Wilkinson, A., Roberts, J., & While, A. E. (2010). Construction of an instrument to measure student information and communication technology skills, experience and attitudes to e-learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1369-1376. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.010
- Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Chuang, F.-T., & Hwang, F.-K. (2014). Middle-school students’ online information problem solving behaviors on the information retrieval interface. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 245-260. doi:10.14742/ajet.478
- Zhang, M. (2013). Supporting middle school students’ online reading of scientific resources: Moving beyond cursory, fragmented, and opportunistic reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 138-152. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00478.x
Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(2)】June (Special Issue: Digital Learning: Retrospect and Prospect)
Directory
(Special Issue) Online Reading Research: A Selective Review
Author: I-Fang Liu(New Taipei City YuLin Elementary School), Hwa-Wei Ko(Graduate Institute of Learning and Instruction, National Central University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 62, No.2
Date：June 2017
Pages：61-87
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).03
Abstract：
With the development of the Internet and digital technology, online reading abilities have become critical in daily life, including in work and education. These skills, which include information searching, evaluation, and integration, are combined with reading and ICT skills. Many countries have started to reconstruct relevant policies in reading education, and the international literacy test organization has also rebuilt the test definitions to fit this new reading environment. This paper indicates how the definitions of ICT skills and reading ability have transformed in the Internet era. Studies focusing on students’ online reading skills published during the last two decades were included in the review, and Taiwan’s contribution to the field was also reviewed. The literature review indicated that students from the fifth to the eighth grades did not show adequate web searching, evaluation, and integration abilities. Some studies have demonstrated that the development of integration ability might depend on web searching and evaluation abilities. Moreover, few studies have focused on Chinese online reading teaching and learning. Thus, future studies should explore instructional programs and learning difficulties to ensure students’ acquisition of online reading abilities. Educators and policy-makers should support teachers to improve students’ learning and establish additional guidelines for the online reading literacy curricula for fifth- and sixth-grade students.
Keywords：evaluation study, integration ability, online reading, school education, web searching