期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(4)十二月刊
Directory
科學想像力圖形測驗之發展
作者:王佳琪(南臺科技大學師資培育中心)、鄭英耀(國立中山大學教育研究所)、何曉琪(國立中山大學人文創新與社會實踐研究中心
卷期：61卷第4期
日期：2016年12月
頁碼：177-204
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).07
摘要：
本研究旨在科學想像力歷程模式的基礎下，發展適用於國小五、六年級的科學想像力圖形測驗。研究對象包含預試樣本558位學生，正式樣本698位學生。本測驗共有A、B、C、D四項作業，每項作業均包含科學想像力歷程中的漫想力、聯想力、奇想力等三個向度，用以測量學生之科學想像力。經以Rasch部分給分模式分析，三向度的量表具有良好的模式資料適配度。所有的作業在男、女學生並無明顯的差異試題功能，且漫想力、聯想力、奇想力之信度分別是 .88、 .88以及 .87。最後，本研究針對「科學想像力圖形測驗」的發展與應用，提出未來研究之建議。
關鍵詞：科學想像力圖形測驗、科學想像力歷程、Rasch部分給分模式
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王文中（2004）。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究，27（4），637- 694。【Wang, W.-C. (2004). Rasch measurement theory and application in education and psychology. Journal of Education & Psychology, 27(4), 637-694.】
- 王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀（2014）。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，61（3），337- 360。【Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Development of the children scientific creative problem solving test. Psychological Testing, 61(3), 337-360.】
- 王佳琪、鄭英耀、劉昆夏、何曉琪（2011）。以Rasch分析檢驗「多向度幽默感量表」之信效度。測驗學刊，58（4），691-713。【Wang, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-Y., Liu, K.-S., & Ho, H.-C. (2011). Validation of the multidimensional sense of humor scale using Rasch analyses. Psychological Testing, 58(4), 691-713.】
- 王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩（2012）。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究，23，105-134。【Wang, Y.-J., Ye, C.-T., & Chiang, Y.-Y. (2012). A study of imagination in drawings by sixth graders. Arts Educations, 23, 105-134.】
- 吳靜吉、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告。臺北市：教育部。【Wu, J.-J., Kuo, J.-S., Lin, W.-W., Liu, S.-H., & Chen, Y.-W. (1998). Development of creative thinking test. Report of a six-year project from Ministry of Education. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
» 展開更多
- 王文中（2004）。Rasch測量理論與其在教育和心理之應用。教育與心理研究，27（4），637- 694。【Wang, W.-C. (2004). Rasch measurement theory and application in education and psychology. Journal of Education & Psychology, 27(4), 637-694.】
- 王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀（2014）。「科學創造性問題解決測驗」之發展。測驗學刊，61（3），337- 360。【Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Development of the children scientific creative problem solving test. Psychological Testing, 61(3), 337-360.】
- 王佳琪、鄭英耀、劉昆夏、何曉琪（2011）。以Rasch分析檢驗「多向度幽默感量表」之信效度。測驗學刊，58（4），691-713。【Wang, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-Y., Liu, K.-S., & Ho, H.-C. (2011). Validation of the multidimensional sense of humor scale using Rasch analyses. Psychological Testing, 58(4), 691-713.】
- 王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩（2012）。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究，23，105-134。【Wang, Y.-J., Ye, C.-T., & Chiang, Y.-Y. (2012). A study of imagination in drawings by sixth graders. Arts Educations, 23, 105-134.】
- 吳靜吉、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1998）。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告。臺北市：教育部。【Wu, J.-J., Kuo, J.-S., Lin, W.-W., Liu, S.-H., & Chen, Y.-W. (1998). Development of creative thinking test. Report of a six-year project from Ministry of Education. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
- 巫博瀚、賴英娟、施慶麟（2013）。「Rosenberg自尊量表」之試題衡鑑：評等量尺模型的應用。測驗學刊，60（2），263-289。【Wu, P.-H., Lai, Y.-C., & Shih, C.- L. (2013). Evaluation of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale using the rating scale model. Psychological Testing, 60(2), 263-289.】
- 林怡君、張麗麗、陸怡琮（2013）。Rasch模式建置國小高年級閱讀理解測驗。教育心理學報，45（1），39-61。doi:10.6251/BEP.20121128【Lin, I.-C., Chang, L., & Lu, I.-C. (2013). The development of reading comprehension test for 5th and 6th graders using the Rasch model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 45(1), 39-61. doi:10.6251/BEP.20121128】
- 張貴琳（2013）。青少年線上閱讀素養評量工具之發展。教育實踐與研究，26（2），29-66。【Chang, K.-L. (2013). The development of adolescent online reading literacy assessments. Journal of Education Practice and Research, 26(2), 29-66.】
- 梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖（2014）。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊，61（1），27-50。【Liang, C.-Y., Hsu, Y.-L., & Lin, W.-S. (2014). The study of imaginative capabilities and imaginative capability scale development. Psychological Testing, 61(1), 27-50.】
- 許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成（2013）。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究季刊，21（2），113-148。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04【Hsu, Y.-L., Liang, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-C. (2013). The influences of individual psychology and school environment on the teachers’ imaginative capability of instructional design. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 21(2), 113-148. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.04】
- 趙子揚、黃嘉莉、宋曜廷、郭蕙寧、許明輝（2016）。教師情境判斷測驗之編製。教育科學研究期刊，61（2），85-117。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).04【Chao, T.-Y., Huang, J.-L., Sung, Y.-T., Kuo, H.-N., & Shiu, M.-H. (2016). Construction of the teacher situational judgment test. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 85-117. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).04】
- 趙小瑩、王文中、葉寶專（2007）。正負向情感及身體激起量表之發展與試題反應分析：焦慮症與憂鬱症三角模式的再探討。測驗學刊，54（1），223-258。【Chao, H.-Y., Wang, W.-C., & Yeh, B.-Z. (2007). Development and item response analysis of the positive, negative, and physiological hyperarousal scales. Psychological Testing, 54(1), 223-258.】
- 劉昆夏、鄭英耀、王文中（2010）。創意產品共識評量之信、效度析論。測驗學刊，57（1），59-84。【Liu, K.-S., Cheng, Y.-Y., & Wang, W.-C. (2010). Consensual assessment for creative products: A review of reliability and validity. Psychological Testing, 57(1), 59-84.】
- 鄭英耀、葉麗貞、劉昆夏、莫慕貞（2011）。大學生基本能力指標之建構。測驗學刊，58（3），531-558。【Cheng, Y.-Y., Yeh, L.-J., Liu, K.-S., & Mok, M. M. C. (2011). Constructing the indicators of undergraduate students’ key competences. Psychological Testing, 58(3), 531-558.】
- 謝如山、謝名娟（2013）。多層面Rasch模式在數學實作評量的應用。教育心理學報，45（1），1-18。doi:10.6251/BEP.20121101.1【Hsieh, J.-S., & Hsieh, M.-C. (2013). An application of many-facet Rasch model to evaluate mathematics performance assessment. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 45(1), 1-18. doi:10.6251/BEP.20121101.1】
- Mayer, R. E.（1990）。教育心理學－認知取向（林清山，譯）。臺北市：遠流。（原著出版於1987年）【Mayer, R. E. (1990). Educational psychology: A cognitive approach (C.-S. Lin, Trans). Taipei, Taiwan: Yuan-Liou. (Original work published 1987)】
- Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.).（2005）。創造力I．理論（李乙明、李淑貞，譯）。臺北市：五南。（原著出版於1999年）【Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of creativity (I.-M. Lee & S.-J. Lee, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book. (Original work published 1999)】
- Abraham, A., Thybusch, K., Pieritz, K., & Hermann, C. (2014). Gender differences in creative thinking: Behavioral and fMRI findings. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 8(1), 39-51. doi:10.1007/ s11682-013-9241-4
- Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Wang, W.-C. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(1), 1-23. doi:10.1177/ 0146621697211001
- Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
- Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
- Campbell, K. H. S., Mcwhir, J., Ritchie, W. A., & Wilmut, I. (1996). Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature, 380, 64-66. doi:10.1038/380064a0
- Cheng, Y.-Y., Wang, W.-C., & Ho, Y.-H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth-fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 369-388. doi:10.1177/0013164408323241
- Cruz, H. D., & Smedt, J. D. (2010). Science as structured imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(1), 37-52. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01324.x
- DeMoss, K., Milich, R., & DeMers, S. (1993). Gender, creativity, depression, and attributional style in adolescents with high academic ability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21(4), 455-467. doi:10.1007/BF01261604
- Eckhoff, A., & Urbach, J. (2008). Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(2), 179-185. doi:10.1007/s10643-008-0261-4
- Finke, R. A., & Slayton, K. (1988). Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory & Cognition, 16(3), 252-257. doi:10.3758/BF03197758
- Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Stefanich, G. (2000). Imagination in science education. Contemporary Education, 71(4), 23-28.
- Ho, H.-C., Wang, C.-C., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2013). Analysis of the scientific imagination process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68-78. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003
- Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1591. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591
- LeBoutillier, N., & Marks, D. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 29-44. doi:10.1348/000712603762842084
- Linacre, J. M. (1998). Thurstone thresholds and the Rasch model. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 12(2), 634-635.
- Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149-174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272
- McCormack, A. (2010). Imagine and invent: Create a great future. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(1), 8-9.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
- Pendry, J. B., Schurig, D., & Smith, D. R. (2006). Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science, 312(5781), 1780-1782. doi:10.1126/science.1125907
- Raju, N. S., Price, L. R., Oshima, T. C., & Nering, M. L. (2007). Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31(3), 169-180. doi:10. 1177/0146621606291569
- Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
- Razumnikova, O. M. (2004). Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An EEG investigation in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 362(3), 193-195. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.066
- Ren, F., Li, X., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2012). Progression of Chinese students’ creative imagination from elementary through high school. International Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 2043-2059. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.709334
- Robinson, A. (2010). Chemistry’s visual origins－Vivid imagination was key to unlocking the secrets of molecular structure in the nineteenth century. Nature, 465, 36. doi:10.1038/465036a
- Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- The Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Appendix H–Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Appendix%20H%20-%20The%20Nature%20of%20Science%20in%20the%20Next%20Generation%20Science%20Standards%204.15.13.pdf
- Vygotsky, S. L. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97.
- Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2015). Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 17, 1-14. doi:10.1016/j. tsc.2015.02.001
- Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., Cheng, C.-L., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Application of the Rasch model to the measurement of creativity: The creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 62-71. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.843347
- Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., Wu, J.-J., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Development of the scientific imagination model: A concept-mapping perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 106-119. doi:10. 1016/j.tsc.2014.04.001
- Wang, W.-C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9(4), 1-22.
- Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1-40. doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1010
- Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring processions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 716-730. doi:10.1002/tea.20318
- Wolfe, E. W., & Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007). Understanding Rasch measurement: Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II-Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(2), 204-233.
- Wood, K. D., & Endres, C. (2004). Motivating student interest with the imagine, elaborate, predict, and confirm (IEPC) strategy. The Reading Teacher, 58(4), 346-357. doi:10.1598/RT.58.4.4
- Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2007). ConQuest [Computer software and manual]. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Zabriskie, B. (2004). Imagination as laboratory. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49(2), 235-242. doi:10.1111/j.1465-5922.2004.00455.x
- Zarnowski, M. (2009). The thought experiment: An imaginative way into civic literacy. Social Studies, 100(2), 55-62. doi:10.3200/TSSS.100.2.55-62
Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(4)】December
Directory
Development of the Scientific Imagination Test-Figural
Author: Chia-Chi Wang (Center for Teaher Educaion, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Ying-Yao Cheng (Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University), Hsiao-Chi Ho (Center for Humanities Innovation and Social Engagement, National Sun Yat-sen University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 61, No. 4
Date：December 2016
Pages：177-204
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).07
Abstract：
This study developed the Scientific Imagination Test-Figural (SIT-Figural) for 5th and 6th graders on the basis of the scientific imagination process. A total of 1,256 students who completed the SIT-Figural constituted Sample 1 (n = 558) and Sample 2 (n = 698). The SIT-Figural, which was designed to measure the students’ scientific imagination, comprised four tasks, A, B, C, and D–which covered three dimensions of the scientific imagination process, namely brainstorming, association, and transformation (or elaboration). The Rasch partial credit model was used to assess the model–data fit. A differential item functioning analysis was conducted to assess the consistency of the ratings provided by male and female students. The results revealed that the three dimensions of the SIT-Figural exhibited an acceptable model–data fit. The three subtests had person separate reliabilities of .88, .88, and .87. Finally, suggestions for future revisions and applications of the SIT-Figural have been proposed in this paper.
Keywords：Rasch partial credit model, scientific imagination process, Scientific Imagination Test-Figural