期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(4)十二月刊
Directory
探討大學生空間自我效能、畫地圖能力與地圖素養之相關性與中介效果
作者:楊登順(國立中山大學教育研究所)、洪瑞兒(國立中山大學教育研究所)
卷期：61卷第4期
日期：2016年12月
頁碼：121-146
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).05
摘要：
本研究旨在探討大學生畫地圖能力、空間自我效能（方向判斷力、距離估算力、位置記憶力）、地圖素養（使用地圖、估算地圖、畫記地圖）的相關性，以及畫地圖能力對於空間自我效能、地圖素養是否具有中介效果？本研究以便利取樣選取南部某大學182位學生參與本研究，利用信度與效度良好的「回憶式速寫校園地圖」、「空間自我效能量表」及「地圖素養量表」為研究工具，蒐集大學生畫地圖能力、空間自我效能及地圖素養。本研究以t考驗、相關分析及階層迴歸分析進行資料分析，主要發現如下：一、男大學生的地圖素養顯著優於女大學生；二、大學生空間自我效能、畫地圖能力與地圖素養具有顯著正相關；三、大學生畫地圖能力在方向判斷力影響使用地圖上具有部分的中介效果。最後，針對上述評量結果提出對於提升大學生的畫地圖能力、空間自我效能及地圖素養相關議題，進行討論與建議。
關鍵詞：大學生、地圖素養、空間自我效能、速寫地圖、畫地圖能力
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 吳明隆（2013）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。新北市：易習圖書。【Wu, M.-L. (2013). SPSS statistical application and learning practice: Data analyses and applied statistics. New Taipei City, Taiwan: Book City.】
- 教育部（2015）。提升青年學生全球移動力專刊。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2015). Promoting youth students’ global mobility. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 陳柏熹、黃馨瑩、陳郁欣、葉泰廷、蘇少祖（2015）。大學生基本素養測驗的發展及信度效度分析。教育科學研究期刊，60（3），95-126。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04【Chen, P.-H., Huang, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., Yeh, T.-T., & Su, S.-T. (2015). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the general literacy test for university students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(3), 95-126. doi: 10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04】
- 陳超明（2013）。下一波的國民競爭力：國際移動力與跨文化思維。教師天地，183，14-20。【Chen, C.-M. (2013). National competitiveness on next wave: International mobility and cross-culture thinking. New Horizon Bimonthly for Teachers in Taipei, 183, 14-20.】
- 張軒瑄（2013）。外籍自助旅客於陌生城市旅遊之尋路行為研究。戶外遊憩研究，26（2），75- 101。doi:10.6130/JORS.2013.26(2)3【Chang, H.-H. (2013). Study of wayfinding behavior of independent international travelers in an unfamiliar city. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Study, 26(2), 75-101. doi:10.6130/JORS.2013.26(2)3】
» 展開更多
- 吳明隆（2013）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。新北市：易習圖書。【Wu, M.-L. (2013). SPSS statistical application and learning practice: Data analyses and applied statistics. New Taipei City, Taiwan: Book City.】
- 教育部（2015）。提升青年學生全球移動力專刊。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2015). Promoting youth students’ global mobility. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 陳柏熹、黃馨瑩、陳郁欣、葉泰廷、蘇少祖（2015）。大學生基本素養測驗的發展及信度效度分析。教育科學研究期刊，60（3），95-126。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04【Chen, P.-H., Huang, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., Yeh, T.-T., & Su, S.-T. (2015). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the general literacy test for university students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(3), 95-126. doi: 10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04】
- 陳超明（2013）。下一波的國民競爭力：國際移動力與跨文化思維。教師天地，183，14-20。【Chen, C.-M. (2013). National competitiveness on next wave: International mobility and cross-culture thinking. New Horizon Bimonthly for Teachers in Taipei, 183, 14-20.】
- 張軒瑄（2013）。外籍自助旅客於陌生城市旅遊之尋路行為研究。戶外遊憩研究，26（2），75- 101。doi:10.6130/JORS.2013.26(2)3【Chang, H.-H. (2013). Study of wayfinding behavior of independent international travelers in an unfamiliar city. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Study, 26(2), 75-101. doi:10.6130/JORS.2013.26(2)3】
- 劉惠珍（2004）。台灣國際領隊的地理素養之研究。環境與世界，9，1-27。doi:10.6304/EAW. 2004.9.1【Liu, H.-C. (2004). The study on the geography literacy of the tour manager in Taiwan. Environment and Worlds, 9, 1-27. doi:10.6304/EAW.2004.9.1】
- Anacta, V. J. A., Wang, J., & Schwering, A. (2014). Routes to remember: Comparing verbal instructions and sketch maps. In J. Huerta, S. Schade, & C. Granell (Eds.), Connecting a digital Europe through location and place (pp. 311-322). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 03611-3_18
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman. doi:10. 5860/CHOICE.35-1826
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
- Bluestein, N., & Acredolo, L. (1979). Developmental changes in map-reading skills. Child Development, 50(3), 691-697. doi:10.2307/1128934
- Chang, K.-T., & Antes, J. R. (1987). Sex and cultural differences in map reading. The American Cartographer, 14(1), 29-42. dol:10.1559/152304087783875345
- Clarke, D. (2003). Are you functionally map literate? Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference (ICC). Retrieved from http://lazarus.inf.elte.hu/cet/publications/088.pdf
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9780203771587
- Coluccia, E., & Iosue, G. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 329-340. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006
- Coluccia, E., Iosue, G., & Brandimonte, M. A. (2007). The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 135-144. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.005
- Dikmenli, Y. (2014). Geographic literacy perception scale (GLPS) validity and reliability study. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(1), 1-15. doi:10.13054/mije.13.43.4.1
- Downs, R. M., & Stea, D. (1973). Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 8-26). Chicago, IL: Aldine. doi:10.1002/9780470979587.ch41
- Harrell, W. A., Bowlby, J. W., & Hall-Hoffarth, D. (2000). Directing wayfinders with maps: The effects of gender, age, route complexity, and familiarity with the environment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(2), 169-178. doi:10.1080/00224540009600456
- Hegarty, M., Montello, D. R., Richardson, A. E., Ishikawa, T., & Lovelace, K. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial- layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151-176. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005
- Hegarty, M., Richardson, A. E., Montello, D. R., Lovelace, K., & Subbiah, I. (2002). Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence, 30(5), 425-447. doi:10. 1016/S0160-2896(02)00116-2
- Ishikawa, T., & Montello, D. R. (2006). Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: Individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 93-129. doi:10.1016/j. cogpsych.2005.08.003
- Kaiser, H. F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark IV. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111- 117. doi:10.1177/001316447403400115
- Kato, Y., & Takeuchi, Y. (2003). Individual differences in wayfinding strategies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 171-188. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00011-2
- Kelley, T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Education Psychology, 30(1), 17-24. doi:10.1037/h0057123
- Koç, H., & Demir, S. B. (2014). Developing valid and reliable map literacy scale. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 4(2), 120-137. Retrieved from http://s3.amazonaws. com/academia.edu.documents/36045199/RIGEO-V4-N2-3.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ56TQJRTWSMTNPEA&Expires=1479815917&Signature=NiaXHBJbXq%2F3h%2ByWD3NWXWqm8UI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DDeveloping_Valid_and_Reliable_Map_Litera.pdf
- Kozlowski, L. T., & Bryant, K. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(4), 590-598. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.590
- Lobben, A. K. (2007). Navigational map reading: Predicting performance and identifying relative influence of map-related abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97(1), 64-85. doi:10. 1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00524.x
- Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Malinowski, J. C., & Gillespie, W. T. (2001). Individual differences in performance on a large-scale, real-world wayfinding task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 73-82. doi:10.1006/ jevp.2000.0183
- Meilinger, T., & Knauff, M. (2008). Ask for directions or use a map: A field experiment on spatial orientation and wayfinding in an urban environment. Journal of Spatial Science, 53(2), 13-23. doi:10.1080/14498596.2008.9635147
- Meyer, M. W. (1973). Map skills instruction and the child’s developing cognitive abilities. Journal of Geography, 72(6), 27-35. doi:10.1080/00221347308981316
- O’Laughlin, E. M., & Brubaker, B. S. (1998). Use of landmarks in cognitive mapping: Gender differences in self report versus performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(5), 595-601. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00237-7
- Pearsall, H., Hawthorne, T., Block, D., Walker, B. L. E., & Masucci, M. (2015). Exploring youth socio-spatial perceptions of higher education landscapes through sketch maps. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(1), 111-130. doi:10.1080/03098265.2014.1002079
- Pease, A., & Pease, B. (1998). Why men don’t listen and women can’t read maps: Beyond the toilet seat being up. Mona Vale, Australia: Pease Training International.
- Perkins, C. (2008). Cultures of map use. The Cartographic Journal, 45(2), 150-158. doi:10.1179/ 174327708X305076
- Piccardi, L., Risetti, M., & Nori, R. (2011). Familiarity and environmental representations of a city: A self-report study. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 309-326. doi:10.2466/01.13.17.PR0.109.4. 309-326
- Saarinen, T. F., & MacCabe, C. L. (1995). World patterns of geographic literacy based on sketch map quality. The Professional Geographer, 47(2), 196-204. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00196.x
- Schmeinck, D., & Thurston, A. (2007). The influence of travel experiences and exposure to cartographic media on the ability of ten-year-old children to draw cognitive maps of the world. Scottish Geographical Journal, 123(1), 1-15. doi:10.1080/00369220718737280
- Schmitz, S. (1999). Gender differences in acquisition of environmental knowledge related to wayfinding behavior, spatial anxiety and self-estimated environmental competencies. Sex Roles, 41(1-2), 71-93. doi:10.1023/A:1018837808724
- Siegel, A. W., & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 9-55). New York, NY: Academic. doi:10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60007-5
- Smeeton, N. C. (1985). Early history of the kappa statistic. Biometrics, 41(3), 795.
- Uttal, D. H. (2000). Seeing the big picture: Map use and the development of spatial cognition. Developmental Science, 3(3), 247-264. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00119
- Uttal, D. H., Fisher, J. A., & Taylor, H. A. (2006). Words and maps: Developmental changes in mental models of spatial information acquired from descriptions and depictions. Developmental Science, 9(2), 221-235. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00481.x
- Weeden, P. (1997). Learning through maps. In D. Tilbury & M. Williams (Eds.), Teaching and learning geography (Vol. 16, pp. 168-179). London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203439050
- West, R. L., Welch, D. C., & Knabb, P. D. (2002). Gender and aging: Spatial self-efficacy and location recall. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 71-80. doi:10.1207/S15324834BAS P2401_7
Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(4)】December
Directory
The Relationships and Mediated Effects of College Students’ Spatial Self-Efficacy, Map-Drawing Ability and Map Literacy
Author: Teng-Shun Yang (Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University), Zuway-R Hong (Institute of Education, National Sun Yat-sen University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 61, No. 4
Date：December 2016
Pages：121-146
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).05
Abstract：
This study investigated the relationships among Taiwanese college students’ map-drawing ability, spatial self-efficacy (direction judgment, distance estimation, and location memory), and map literacy (using maps, estimating maps, drawing maps). The mediated effects of students’ map-drawing ability on the relationship between their spatial self-efficacy and map literacy were explored. A total of 182 undergraduates were selected from a university in Kaohsiung City through convenient sampling. Campus sketch maps as well as the spatial self-efficacy scale (SSES) and map literacy scale (MLS) were employed to measure college students’ map-drawing ability, spatial self-efficacy, and map literacy. These skills were then compared and contrasted through factor analyses, t tests, correlation analyses, hierarchical regression, and theme content analyses. The results revealed that male college students possessed significantly higher map literacy than their female counterparts did. The students’ spatial self-efficacy, map-drawing ability, and map literacy were significantly and positively related. In addition, this study provides evidence to support that map-drawing ability partially mediates between direction judgment and map use. The implications of the findings and recommendations for future research are discussed.
Keywords：college students, map-drawing ability, map literacy, sketch map, spatial self-efficacy