期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(1)三月刊
Directory
我如何知道我關心什麼？─不同背景大學生的自身技術之分析
作者:郭丁熒(國立臺南大學教育學系)
卷期：61卷第1期
日期：2016年3月
頁碼：169-199
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07
摘要：
本研究旨在探討大學生運用自身技術之現況，並比較不同背景變項大學生的自身技術之差異情形。先根據文獻探討及40位大學生訪談資料所編製之「大學生自身技術量表」，針對452位大學生進行預試，再以修訂後之量表調查1,361位大學生，調查資料經以SPSS for Windows 21.0版套裝軟體中次數分配、單因子多變項分析、薛費事後多重比較分析法來進行資料處理與分析。研究結果發現：（一）大學生的自身技術包括鍛鍊、告解坦白、問題化、自我檢查、對話辯證、說真話、越界體驗、節制、觀察等九類，運用情形大都為中高程度；（二）大學生最常採用的自身技術是鍛鍊，而最不常採用的是告解坦白；（三）大學生採用的自身技術因其背景之不同而呈現多樣性，其中以有宗教信仰者最為多元。本研究反映出大學生可透過自身技術來治理自我之可能性，而最常使用鍛鍊可能與大學生的學習角色有關，最不常使用告解坦白則可能與教育或文化有關。
關鍵詞：大學生、自身、自身技術
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王保進（2006）。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市：心理。【Wang, B.-J. (2006). Chinese windows version SPSS and behavioral science research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- 王浩威（2014）。是怎樣的一個社會，逼出鄭捷這樣的生命狀態？天下雜誌。取自http://www. cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058359&idSubChannel=49【Wang, H.-W. (2014). What is a society to extract a life state of Zheng Jie? Common Wealth. Retrieved from http:// www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058359&idSubChannel=49】
- 王震武、林文瑛、張郡雯（2011）。科學教育有助於消除迷信嗎？－從思考統整層面所做的觀察。教育心理學報，42（3），467-490。doi:10.6251/BEP.20091112【Wang, J.-W., Lin, W.-Y., & Chang, Y.-W. (2011). The effect of science education on scientific thinking and superstitious thinking in terms of local coherence and global coherence. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 42(3), 467-490. doi:10.6251/BEP.20091112】
- 行政院主計總處（2013）。101年家庭收支調查報告。臺北市：作者。【Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. (2013). Household income and expenditure survey, 2012. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 何乏筆（2003）。從性史到修養史－論傅柯《性史》第二卷中的四元架構。載於黃瑞琪（主編），後學新論：後現代／後結構／後殖民（pp. 75-103）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Heubel, F. (2003). From the history of sexuality to the history of self-cultivation: The theoretical structure of Foucault’s history of sexuality II. In R. R. C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 75-103). Taipei, Taiwan: Walkers Cultural.】
» 展開更多
- 王保進（2006）。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北市：心理。【Wang, B.-J. (2006). Chinese windows version SPSS and behavioral science research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- 王浩威（2014）。是怎樣的一個社會，逼出鄭捷這樣的生命狀態？天下雜誌。取自http://www. cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058359&idSubChannel=49【Wang, H.-W. (2014). What is a society to extract a life state of Zheng Jie? Common Wealth. Retrieved from http:// www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5058359&idSubChannel=49】
- 王震武、林文瑛、張郡雯（2011）。科學教育有助於消除迷信嗎？－從思考統整層面所做的觀察。教育心理學報，42（3），467-490。doi:10.6251/BEP.20091112【Wang, J.-W., Lin, W.-Y., & Chang, Y.-W. (2011). The effect of science education on scientific thinking and superstitious thinking in terms of local coherence and global coherence. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 42(3), 467-490. doi:10.6251/BEP.20091112】
- 行政院主計總處（2013）。101年家庭收支調查報告。臺北市：作者。【Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan. (2013). Household income and expenditure survey, 2012. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 何乏筆（2003）。從性史到修養史－論傅柯《性史》第二卷中的四元架構。載於黃瑞琪（主編），後學新論：後現代／後結構／後殖民（pp. 75-103）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Heubel, F. (2003). From the history of sexuality to the history of self-cultivation: The theoretical structure of Foucault’s history of sexuality II. In R. R. C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 75-103). Taipei, Taiwan: Walkers Cultural.】
- 吳承澤（2013）。時尚、啟蒙與表演：論傅柯筆下的花花公子主義作為一種自我技術。載於黃瑞祺（主編），理論的饗宴（pp. 147-184）。臺北市：碩亞。【Wu, C.-T. (2013). Fashion, enlightenment, and performance: Foucault’s dandysme as a technology of the self. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), Symposia on theories (pp. 147-184). Taipei, Taiwan: ASIAWORLD Digital Technology.】
- 邱珍琬（2011）。首次離家大學女生對家的觀感－初探研究。彰化師大教育學報，19，31-58。【Chiu, J.-W. (2011). First-time leave-home college freshwomen’s perception of home－A pilot study. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 19, 31-58.】
- 南方朔（2004）。將北部影響力擴大到南部。遠見，215，180。取自http://www.gvm.com.tw/ Boardcontent_9741.html【Nan, F.-S. (2004). Expanding the influence in the north to the south. Global Views Monthly, 215, 180. Retrieved from http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_9741.html】
- 姚人多（2005）。說真話的問題化－《傅柯說真話》導讀。載於鄭義愷（譯），傅柯說真話（pp. 9-43）。臺北市：群學。【Yao, J.-T. (2005). The problematization of parrhesia: Reviewing “Fearless Speech”. In I.-K. Jeng (Trans.), Fearless speech (pp. 9-43). Taipei, Taiwan: Socio.】
- 胡蘭沁（2007）。大學生之背景、生活型態及兼職工作對其消費決策型態及消費類型影響力之探討。人文研究學報，41（2），99-124。【Hwu, L.-C. (2007). A study of the influence of college students’ background, life style and part-time job on their consumption decision style and types of consumption. Journal of Humanistic Studies, 41(2), 99-124.】
- 范信賢（1999）。國民教育中的國家角色初探：「以學生為主體」的省視。研習資訊，16（2），60-67。【Fan, H.-H. (1999). The role of nation in national education: Call upon the subject of student. Educator and Professional Development, 16(2), 60-67.】
- 夏學理（2014）。「震」垮蔣偉寧！夏學理：知識份子弱化成知識販子！NOWnews。取自http://www.nownews.com/n/2014/ 07/16/1324049【Hsia, H.-L. (2014). Intellectuals weakened into knowledge traffickers. NOWnews. Retrieved from http://www. nownews.com/n/2014/07/16/1324049】
- 高宣揚（2004）。傅柯的生存美學：西方思想的起點與終點。臺北市：五南。【Kao, S.-Y. (2004). L’ Esthetique de l’existence chez Foucault. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 教育部（2014）。103學年度大學網路博覽會。取自http://univ.edu.tw/AreaView.asp【Ministry of Education. (2014). University networking exposition, 2014. Retrieved from http://univ.edu.tw/Area View.asp】
- 教育部統計處（2014）。教育統計查詢網。取自https://stats.moe.gov.tw/【Deportment of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2014). Education statistics query network. Retrieved from https:// stats.moe.gov.tw/】
- 郭丁熒（2013）。大學學系教育目標之分析及其對課程與教學的啟示。課程與教學季刊，16（2），1-32。【Guo, D.-Y. (2013). The educational goals of university-departments and their implications in curriculum and instruction. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(2), 1-32.】
- 郭丁熒（2014）。大學生關懷自身之探討：3W的分析。教育心理學報，46（1），1-26。doi:10. 6251/BEP.20131113【Guo, D.-Y. (2014). The care-for-self of undergraduates: An analysis via 3W. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 1-26. doi:10.6251/BEP.20131113】
- 郭丁熒（2015）。大學生自身技術之研究：研究工具編製與類型建構。教育科學研究期刊，60（3），27-62。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02【Guo, D.-Y. (2015). The study of undergraduates’ technologies of self: Inventory and taxonomy. Journal of Research in Education Science, 60(3), 27-62. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02】
- 陳一姍（2010）。大學危機1－高等教育退場朝啟動，我的大學不見了！天下雜誌，444，72-77。【Chen, Y.-S. (2010). Taiwanese higher education in crisis (I): My university has disappeared. Common Wealth, 444, 72-77.】
- 陳秉華、程玲玲、范嵐欣、莊雅婷（2013）。融入基督信仰的靈性諮商課程暨成果評估。教育心理學報，44（4），853-874。doi:10.6251/BEP.20120504【Chen, P.-H., Cheng, L.-L., Fan, L.-H., & Juang, Y.-T. (2013). Teaching a course on integrating spirituality into counseling. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 44(4), 853-874. doi:10.6251/BEP.20120504】
- 程小蘋（2009）。教育的方法（二）－輔導、諮商。載於徐宗林、簡成熙、吳錦惠、董宜佩、陳惠萍、鄭世仁…吳俊憲等，教育導論（pp. 319-358）。臺北市：五南。【Cheng, H.-P. (2009). Guidance and counselling. In Z.-L. Syu, C.-H. Chien, C.-H. Wu, I.-P. Tung, H.-P. Chen, S.-J. Cheng, …C.-H. Wu (Eds.), Introduction to education (pp. 319-358). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 黃芳銘（2004）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市：五南。【Huwang, F.-M. (2004). Structural equation modeling: Theory and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 黃瑞祺（2003）。自我修養與自我創新：晚年傅柯的主體／自我觀。載於黃瑞祺（主編），後學新論（pp. 11-45）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Hwang, R. R.-C. (2003). Self-cultivation as self-innovation: The concept of subject and self in late Foucault. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 11-45). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
- 黃瑞祺（主編）（2013）。理論的饗宴。臺北市：碩亞。【Hwang, R. R.-C. (Ed.). (2013). Symposia on theories. Taipei, Taiwan: ASIAWORLD.】
- 楊朝祥（2002）。私校發展之困境與突破。通識教育季刊，9（1），111-120。【Yang, C.-S. (2002). Development obstacles and strategies of private university in Taiwan. Journal of General Education, 9(1), 111-120.】
- 劉若蘭（2009）。大學教育品質與學生學習發展之因果模式研究。教育政策論壇，12（3），99-124。【Liu, R.-L. (2009). The causal model of quality for college education and outcomes of learning and development of students. Educational Policy Forum, 12(3), 99-124.】
- 劉若蘭、林大森（2011）。影響大學生畢業流向因素之研究。當代教育研究，19（1），101-144。 doi:10.6151/CERQ.2011.1901.03【Liu, R.-L., & Lin, D.-S. (2011). A study of impact factors on graduate destination. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 19(1), 101-144. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2011.1901.03】
- 蔡明璋（2014）。要市場社會，不要市場經濟：以台灣為主體的發展。取自http://pnn.pts.org.tw/ main/2014/05/05/%e8%a6%81%e5%b8%82%e5%a0%b4%e7%a4%be%e6%9c%83%ef%bc%8c%e4%b8%8d%e8%a6%81%e5%b8%82%e5%a0%b4%e7%b6%93%e6%bf%9f%ef%bc%9a%e4%bb%a5%e5%8f%b0%e7%81%a3%e7%82%ba%e4%b8%bb%e9%ab%94%e7%9a%84%e7%99%bc%e5%b1%95/【Tsai, M.-C. (2014). To market society, not a market economy: Taiwan as the subject of development. Retrieved from http://pnn.pts.org.tw/main/2014/05/05/%e8%a6%81%e5%b8%82%e5%a0%b4%e7%a4%be%e6%9c%83 %ef%bc%8c%e4%b8%8d%e8%a6%81%e5%b8%82%e5%a0%b4%e7%b6%93%e6%bf%9f%ef%bc%9a%e4%bb%a5%e5%8f%b0%e7%81%a3%e7%82%ba%e4%b8%bb%e9%ab%94%e7%9a%84%e7%99%bc%e5%b1%95/】
- 鄭文勝、郭丁熒（2008）。傅科的思想進路與自我技術之探討。教育學誌，19，29-62。【Cheng, W.-S., & Guo, D.-Y. (2008). The stages of Foucault’s thoughts and the technologies of the self. Journal of Education, 19, 29-62.】
- 還孩子做自己的行動聯盟（2014）。源起與聲明。取自http://www.letchildrenbe.org/?page_id=487【The Action Coalition of Children Do Their Own. (2014). Origin and declaration. Retrieved from http://www. letchildrenbe.org/?page_id=487】
- Foucault, M.（2005）。傅柯說真話（鄭義愷，譯）。臺北市：群學。（原著出版於2001年）【Foucault, M. (2005). Fearless speech (I.-K. Jeng, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Socio. (Original work published 2001)】
- Jay, M.（2014）。20世代，你的人生是不是卡住了：你以為時間還很多，但有些決定不能拖（胡琦君，譯）。臺北市：天下文化。（原著出版於2012年）【Jay, M. (2014). The defining decade: Why your twenties matter and how to make the most of them now (C.-J. Hu, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: CommonWealth. (Original work published 2012)】
- Lewis, H. R.（2007）。失去靈魂的優秀－哈佛如何忘卻其教育宗旨？（侯定凱，譯）。臺北市：張老師文化。（原著出版於2006年）【Lewis, H. R. (2007). Excellent without a soul: How a great university forgot education (D.-K. Hou, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Living Psychology. (Original work published 2006)】
- Merquior, J. G.（1998）。傅柯（陳瑞麟，譯）。臺北市：桂冠。（原著出版於1985年）【Merquior, J. G. (1998). Foucault (R.-L. Chen, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate. (Original work published 1985)】
- Baudelaire, C. (1995). The painter of modern life and other essays (2nd ed.) (J. Mayne, Trans.). London, UK: Phaidon Press. (Original work published 1964)
- Birnbaum, M. G. (2008). Taking Goffman on a tour of Facebook: College students and the presentation of self in a mediated digital environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
- Bordo, S. (1989). The body and the reproduction of femininity: A feminist approbation of Foucault. In A. M. Jaggar & S. Bordo (Eds.), Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstruction of being and knowing (pp. 13-33). New Brunswick, Canada: Rutgers University Press.
- Britton, C., & Baxter, A. (1999). Becoming a mature student: Gendered narratives of the self. Gender and Education, 11(2), 179-193. doi:10.1080/09540259920681
- Cahill, H. (2012). Form and governance: Considering the drama as a ‘technology of the self’. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Perforance, 17(3), 405-424. doi:10.1080/13569783.2012.701444
- Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1975)
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
- Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32-50). New York, NY: Pantheon.
- Foucault, M. (1988a). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
- Foucault, M. (1988b). Politics, philosophy, culture (A. Sheridan & Others, Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1984)
- Foucault, M. (1996). Foucault live (interviews, 1961-1984). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
- Foucault, M. (2006). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the College de France, 1981-1982 (G. Frédéric, Ed., G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Picador. (Original work published 2001)
- Freire, P. (1999). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New revised 20th-anniversary edition) (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1970)
- Hardy, I. (2015). Education as a ‘risky business’: Theorising student and teacher learning in complex times. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(3), 375-394. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013. 829746
- Hodges, B. (2004). Medical student bodies and the pedagogy of self-reflection, self-assessment, and self-regulation. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 20(2), 41-52.
- Infinito, J. (2003). Jane Elliot meets Foucault: The formation of ethical identities in the classroom. Journal of Moral Education, 32(1), 67-76. doi:10.1080/0305724022000073347
- Karakitapoğlu-Aygün, Z. (2004). Self, identity, and emotional well-being among Turkish university students. The Journal of Psychology, 138(5), 457-478. doi:10.3200/JRLP.138.5.457-480
- Lotringer, S., & Hochroth, L. (Eds.). (1997). The politics of truth. New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
- Mpofu, E. (1994). Exploring the self-concept in an African culture. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 155(3), 341-354. doi:10.1080/00221325.1994.9914784
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Pollack, W. S. (2006). The “war” for boys: Hearing “real boys” voices, healing their pain. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(2), 190-195. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.37.2.190
- Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London, UK: Routledge.
- Slifkin, J. M. (2001). Writing the care of the self: Variances in higher order thinking and narrative topics in high school students’ reflective journals. English Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 5-9.
- Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282-298. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1
- Warin, J. (2015). Identity capital: An application from a longitudinal ethnographic study of self- construction during the years of school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(5), 689-706. doi:10.1080/01425692.2013.849565
| 中文APA引文格式 | 郭丁熒(2016)。我如何知道我關心什麼？─不同背景大學生的自身技術之分析。教育科學研究期刊，61(1)，169-199。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07
|
|---|
| APA Format | Guo, D.-Y. (2016). How Do I Know What I Care About?—Analysis of Technologies-of-Self for Undergraduates With Different Backgrounds. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(1), 169-199. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07
|
|---|
Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(1)】March
Directory
How Do I Know What I Care About?—Analysis of Technologies-of-Self for Undergraduates With Different Backgrounds
Author: Ding-Ying Guo(Department of Education, National University of Tainan)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 61, No. 1
Date：March 2016
Pages：169-199
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).07
Abstract：
The purposes of this study were to survey the current status of undergraduates’ technologies-of-self and to analyze the differences of technologies-of-self for undergraduates with different backgrounds. The subjects were 1,361 undergraduates who participated in the survey study by using “The Technologies-of-Self Inventory for Undergraduates” as an instrument. The protocol of this instrument was prepared according to a literature review and data obtained from interviewing 40 undergraduates, whereas the validity and reliability of the instrument were established using a subsequent pretest in which 452 undergraduates participated. The data obtained from the survey study were statistically analyzed through frequency distribution, MONOVA, and a Scheffé Post Hoc Test by using SPSS for Windows 21.0 as software. The findings of this study indicate that the undergraduates adopted nine types of technologies-of-self: exercise, confession, problematization, self-examination, dialogue, parrhesia, transgressive experience, moderation, and observation. Their use of technologies-of-self was determined to be medium–high. The exercise technology was most often adopted by the undergraduates, whereas the confession technology was the most seldom used. The frequent use of exercise technology may have occurred because learning is the salient role of undergraduates, whereas the infrequent use of confession technology may have resulted from educational or cultural differences between Taiwan and Western countries. Undergraduates with a specific religious belief adopted more technologies-of-self compared with those with no specific religious beliefs. The results of this study imply that self-discovery and self-formation can be achieved by undergraduates through technologies-of-self.
Keywords：undergraduate, self, technologies-of-self