期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(2)六月刊(本期專題:師資培育:檢討、成效與前瞻)
Directory

大學生全球公民素養的自覺評價與結構模型分析之研究
作者:陳淑敏(大同大學通識教育中心)

卷期:61卷第2期
日期:2016年6月
頁碼:213-245
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).08

摘要:
面對全球化社會的劇烈轉變之際,大學校院是培育新一代青年具有全球公民素養的重要機構,基於此趨向,本研究運用文獻和理論論述、深度訪談與焦點會議等方法,建構研究問卷後,以全國大學校院學生為對象,進一步以平均數、多變量考驗分析、結構方程模式等統計策略,分析大學生之全球公民素養的表現與影響情形。研究發現包括:一、大學生全球公民素養之表現,在不同構面、觀察變項和個別題項上,存在強烈程度不一的情形,當涉及跨國或全球層次者,得分較為偏低;二、大學生的全球公民素養之認知、德性與行動表現,部分受到性別、學校類型、學生年級別等背景變項的影響;三、大學生的全球公民素養之認知、德性與行動表現上,存在影響路徑機制與效果。研究者提供增進大學生全球公民素養和未來研究實施的建議。
 

關鍵詞:大學生、公民素養、全球化、結構方程模式

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
    1. 王俊斌(2008)。後民主化狀況及其公民教育問題─一種趨向性對比範式的建構。彰化師大教育學報,14,19-41。【Wang, C.-P. (2008). Post-democratizing condition and problems of citizenship education: A comparative mode of dichotomous perspectives. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 14, 19-41.】
    2. 余民寧(2006)。潛在變項模式:SIMPLIS的應用。臺北市:高等教育。【Yu, M.-N. (2006). Latent variable models: The application of SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
    3. 沈宗瑞(2000)。兩種公民資格觀的衝突與融合。載於國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育學系舉辦之二十一世紀公民與道德教育學術研討會論文集(pp. 165-186),臺北市。【Shen, T.-R. (2000). The historical dialogue between republican citizenship and liberalist citizenship. In Department (Graduate Institute) of Civic and Moral Education, National Taiwan Normal University (Ed.), Symposium of Studies in Civics and Moral Education for 21th Century (pp. 165-186), Taipei, Taiwan.】
    4. 沈清松(2004)。大學理念與外推精神。臺北市:五南。【Shen, V. (2004). Idea of university and spirit of strangification. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
    5. 洪玉雪(2007)。大學生參與國際性志願服務經驗探討─以輔大2007年菲律賓海外服務方案為例(未出版碩士論文)。輔仁大學,新北市。【Hung, Y.-H. (2007). Exploring the experience of university student involvement in international voluntary service-A case study of an overseas service project of Fu Jen university in the Philippines in 2007 (Unpublished master’s thesis). Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式陳淑敏(2016)。大學生全球公民素養的自覺評價與結構模型分析之研究。教育科學研究期刊61(2),213-245。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).08
APA FormatChen, A. S. (2016). Undergraduates' Self-Evaluation and Structural Equation Model Analysis of Global Citizenship Competences. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 213-245. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(1).08
 

Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(2)】June (Special Issue: Teacher Education: Reflection, Effect, and Prospect)
Directory

Undergraduates' Self-Evaluation and Structural Equation Model Analysis of Global Citizenship Competences
Author: Amy Shumin Chen(Center for General Education, Tatung University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 61, No. 2
Date: June 2016
Pages:213-245
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).08

Abstract:

Colleges and universities are vital organizations for cultivating the participation of future generations of youths in addressing the dramatic transformations of global society. Regarding this movement, this study employed a literature and theoretical analysis as well as in-depth interviews and focus group meetings to construct a research questionnaire. The questionnaire was administered to undergraduates. The survey data were analyzed through various statistical methods including: analysis of variance, t test, and post hoc and structural equation modeling to explore the undergraduates’ global participation achievements and performance. The research findings are as follows: (1) College students’ achievements in global citizenship competences demonstrated varying levels of performance in each studied dimension; some low scores were observed, particularly regarding global or cross-national problems. (2) The performance of some of the undergraduates in the cognition, virtue, and action dimensions of global citizenship competences were influenced by their background variables. (3) The model of the relationships among the undergraduates’ performance in the cognitive, virtue, and action dimensions of global citizenship competences revealed the significant effects in the structural equation model. This paper offers suggestions for improving undergraduates’ competencies in global citizenship attainments and for directions for future research.

Keywords:undergraduate, citizenship, globalization, structural equation model