大學藝術與設計專業課程融入社會實踐之探究──以地方文化加值設計為例
作者:國立虎尾科技大學多媒體設計系廖敦如
卷期：63卷第1期
日期：2018年3月
頁碼：207-245
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).07
摘要：
臺灣近年來有關藝術與設計實務導向的相關理論研究已開始萌芽，藝術課程的實務性應建基於「實踐性」，有實踐性才能產生實務的意義；再者，具有實踐性的行動課程，關心的面向應在於是否能以廣闊的視野來論述社會和文化意義。站在藝術教育的立場，教學者有責任將抽象的理論概念，轉變為實踐的行動，讓學生直接面對真實世界的問題，此過程才能產出知識改變的力量。另者，科技部近年亦重視大學的社會責任，期許高等教育能針對臺灣的重要社會議題，提出具人文關懷與學術創新的行動方案。因此，本研究採用為期1年半的行動研究，學生以分組實作的方式，探索各鄉鎮的農業產業文化，以及面臨的問題與困境。據此，本研究的目的為：一、應用「實務導向」的課程理念創造大學生對在地文化的關懷；二、以「社會實踐」的理念規劃地方文化為主軸的藝術設計課程。本研究結果為：一、以實務導向、地方文化為課程理念，可以激發學生「人文探索」、「科技應用」、「社會創新」、「族群關懷」等能力，具有整合性人才培育的效益；二、以社會實踐為課程發展模式，應重視「問題規劃」、「學習社群」、「教學者」、「學習者」等四個層面的設計。
關鍵詞：大學藝術與設計教育、地方文化、社會實踐、問題解決導向、實務導向研究
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 何文玲、李傳房、陳俊宏（2013）。大學「藝術與設計實務導向研究」之教學個案：整合創作、理論與寫作。藝術教育研究，26，1-32。【Ho, W.-L., Li, C.-F., & Chen, C.-H. (2013). A case study on teaching art and design practice-led research in university: Integrating creation with theory and writing. Research in Arts Education, 26, 1-32.】
- 何文玲、嚴貞（2011）。藝術與設計「實務研究」應用於大學藝術系學生創作發展之研究。藝術教育研究，21，85-110。【Ho, W.-L., & Yen, J. (2011). A study of art and design practice research applied to college students’ art creation. Research in Arts Education, 21, 85-110.】
- 林我崇（2003）。問題導向教學策略對技職校院學生行銷研究學習成效及人際溝通能力提昇之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。【Lin, W.-C. (2003). A study on performance and interpersonal communication ability enhancement of problem- based teaching for vocational students studying marketing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Changhua Normal University, Changhua, Taiwan.】
- 林佩璇（2009）。課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究，22（2），95-122。【Lin, P.-H. (2009). The practical discourses of curriculum action research: From one-self towards social culture. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 22(2), 95-122.】
- 科技部（2016）。人文創新與社會實踐計畫。取自https://www.most.gov.tw/hum/ch/list?menu_id= 467bd1e5-f493-4b9a-82a3-b3d9df07de47 【Ministry of Technology and Science. (2016). Cultural innovation and social practice project. Retrieved from https://www.most.gov.tw/hum/ch/list?menu_id=467bd1e5-f493-4b9a-82a3-b3d9df07de47】
» 展開更多
- 何文玲、李傳房、陳俊宏（2013）。大學「藝術與設計實務導向研究」之教學個案：整合創作、理論與寫作。藝術教育研究，26，1-32。【Ho, W.-L., Li, C.-F., & Chen, C.-H. (2013). A case study on teaching art and design practice-led research in university: Integrating creation with theory and writing. Research in Arts Education, 26, 1-32.】
- 何文玲、嚴貞（2011）。藝術與設計「實務研究」應用於大學藝術系學生創作發展之研究。藝術教育研究，21，85-110。【Ho, W.-L., & Yen, J. (2011). A study of art and design practice research applied to college students’ art creation. Research in Arts Education, 21, 85-110.】
- 林我崇（2003）。問題導向教學策略對技職校院學生行銷研究學習成效及人際溝通能力提昇之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。【Lin, W.-C. (2003). A study on performance and interpersonal communication ability enhancement of problem- based teaching for vocational students studying marketing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Changhua Normal University, Changhua, Taiwan.】
- 林佩璇（2009）。課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究，22（2），95-122。【Lin, P.-H. (2009). The practical discourses of curriculum action research: From one-self towards social culture. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 22(2), 95-122.】
- 科技部（2016）。人文創新與社會實踐計畫。取自https://www.most.gov.tw/hum/ch/list?menu_id= 467bd1e5-f493-4b9a-82a3-b3d9df07de47 【Ministry of Technology and Science. (2016). Cultural innovation and social practice project. Retrieved from https://www.most.gov.tw/hum/ch/list?menu_id=467bd1e5-f493-4b9a-82a3-b3d9df07de47】
- 范信賢（2005）。敘說課程實踐的故事：一種敘事性觀看教師經驗的方式。教育研究月刊，130，45-55。【Fan, H.-H. (2005). Narrating a story of curricular practice: A narrative perspective of viewing teaching experience. Journal of Education Research, 130, 45-55.】
- 陳東升（2013）。從設計到社計的社會學想像（一）。巷仔口社會學。取自https://twstreetcorner. org/2013/10/28/chendungsheng/ 【Chen, D.-S. (2013). Sociological imagination from design to social design (I). Alley Sociology. Retrieved from https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/10/28/chendungsheng/】
- 陳國泰（2007）。問題導向學習的教學策略在大學課程與教學創新的應用之探究。載於國立聯合大學舉辦之「大學課程與教學之卓越化」研討會論文集（pp. 119-132），苗栗市。【Chen, K.-T. (2007). A study on applying problem-based teaching strategy to curriculum and teaching innovation in universities. In National United University (Ed.), Symposium on optimization of college curriculum and teaching (pp. 119-132), Miaoli, Taiwan.】
- 黃世輝（2012）。從社區開始改變─人文創新與社會實踐的機會。人文與社會科學簡訊，14（1），17-25。【Huang, S.-H. (2012). Change from community – Chance for cultural innovation and social practice. Humanities and Social Sciences Newsletter, 14(1), 17-25.】
- 董維琇（2013）。藝術介入社群：社會參與式的美學與藝術實踐。藝術研究學報，6（2），27-38。【Tung, W.-H. (2013). Art intervention into the community: A socially engaged aesthetics and art practice. Journal of Performing and Visual Arts Studies, 6(2), 27-38.】
- 廖敦如（2007）。應用問題導向學習策略於建立大專學生公民美學觀之藝術行動課程研究。國際藝術教育學刊，5（2），79-118。【Liao, T.-J. (2007). A study on applying problem-based learning strategy to art action course for establishing citizen aesthetics of college students. International Journal of Arts Education, 5(2), 79-118.】
- 廖敦如（2009）。建構社區文化圖像之藝術行動課程─「行動學習」導向在大學通識藝術教育上的應用。教育科學研究期刊，54（2），163-198。【Liao, T.-J. (2009). Art action programs that establish community cultural image: Application of “Action learning” to art curriculum programs in liberal education in universities. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(2), 163-198.】
- 劉豐榮（2004）。視覺藝術創作研究方法之理論基礎探析：以質化研究觀點為基礎。藝術教育研究，8，73-94。【Liu, F.-J. (2004). An analysis of theoretical foundation for research methods of visual art production: Qualitative perspectives. Research in Arts Education, 8, 73-94.】
- 鄧宗聖（2014）。藝術本位對素養教育實踐之啟示。藝術研究期刊，10，159-186。【Deng, T.-S. (2014). Art-based in competence education practice. Journal of Art Research, 10, 159-186.】
- 顧瑜君（2006）。學校、教育與村落：談社會實踐與關懷課程落實的可能。國教學報，18，29-48。【Ku, Y.-C. (2006). School, education and village: The possibility of the social practice and concerning curriculum. Journal of Research on Elementary Education, 18, 29-48.】
- Barell, J.（2011）。問題引導學習：探究取向（黃永和、黃儒傑、陳新轉、林佑真、林曜聖、曾俊傑…陳永裕，譯；徐超聖，總校閱）。臺北市：華騰文化。（原著出版於1998年）【Barell, J. (2011). Problem-based learning: Research oriented (Y.-H., Huang, J.-C., Huang, H.-C., Chen, Y.-C., Lin, Y.-S., Lin, C.-C., Tseng, …Y.-Y. Chen, Trans.; S.-C. Hsu, Rev.). Taipei, Taiwan: Farterng. (Original work published 1998)】
- McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J.（2004）。行動研究―原理與實作（朱仲謀，譯）。臺北市：五南。（原著出版於1988年） 【McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2004). Action research – Principles and practice (C.-M. Chu, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book. (Original work published 1988)】
- Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1991). Participatory action research and action science compared: A commentary. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 85-96). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412985383.n6
- Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design: A review of forty years of design research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16-29. doi:10.1162/074793604772933739
- Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics (S. Pleasance & F. Woods, Trans.). Dijon, France: LesPresse du réel. (Original work published 1988)
- Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide. Retrieved from https://www.creativityand cognition.com/resources/PBR%20Guide-1.1-2006.pdf
- Crang, P. (1997). Cultural turns and the (re) constitution of economic geography: Introducation to section one. In R. Lee & J. Wills (Eds.), Geographies of economic (pp. 3-15). London, UK: Arnold.
- de Freitas, N. (2007). Activating a research context in art and design practice. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 1-15. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010214
- Doll, Jr. W. E. (1998). Curriculum and concepts of control. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum toward new identities (pp. 295-323). New York, NY: Garland.
- Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
- Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education, 20(1) (pp. 3-56). Washington, DC: AERA. doi:10.3102/0091732X020001003
- Flood, R. L. (2001). The relationship of “systems thinking” to action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 133-144). London, UK: Sage.
- Grundy, S., & Kemmis, S. (1981). Educational action research in Australia: The state of the art. In S. Kemmis & R. McTaggart (Eds.), The action research reade (pp. 321-334). Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
- Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook. New York, NY: Jorge Pinto Books.
- Irwin, R. I., & O’Donoghue, D. (2012). Encountering pedagogy through relational art practices. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 31(3), 221-236. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01760.x
- Jaehan, B. (2017). Art as social practice: Pedagogical enlightenments. The International Journal of Arts Education, 14(2), 1-21.
- Jennings, L. E., & Graham, A. P. (1996). Exposing discourses through action research. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 165-181). London, UK: The Falmer Press. doi:10.4324/9780203392935_chapter_10
- Keller, D., & Sandlin, J. (2013). Socially engaged practice and pedagogy: A new lexicon. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/5654246/Socially_Engaged_Practice_as_Public_Pedagogy
- Kemmis, S. (1988). Action research in retrospect and prospect. In Deakin University Production Unit (Ed.), The action research reader (3rd ed., pp. 27-46). Geelong, AU: Deakin University Press.
- Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner. Geelong, AU: Deakin University.
- Kemmis, S., & Wilkinson, M. (1998). Participatory action research and the study of practice. In B. Atweh, S. Kemmis, & P. Weeks (Eds.), Action research in practice: Partnerships for social justice in education (pp. 21-36). New York, NY: Routledge.
- McKernan, J. (1996). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner (2nd ed.). London, UK: Kogan Page.
- Rubinstein, D., & Schwarzschild, S. S. (1982). Marx and Wittgenstein: Social praxis and social explanation. Contemporary Sociology, 11(6), 733-734. doi:10.2307/2068582
- Shim, D.-S. (2014). A study on the Rirkrit Tiravanija’s artwork: Focused on relational aesthetics and post-colonialism (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sung-shin University, Seoul, South Kore.
- Somekh, B., & Thaler, M. (1997). Contradictions of management theory organizational cultures and the self. In S. Hollingsworth (Ed.), International action research (pp. 275-287). Washington, DC: Falmer.
- Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, UK: Heinemann.
- Tanner, C. K. (1997). Problem-based learning in advanced preparation of educational leaders. Educational Planning, 10(3). 3-12.
- Thompson, N. (2011). Socially engaged contemporary art: Tactical and strategic manifestations. Retrieved from https://animatingdemocracy.org/sites/default/files/NThompson%20Trend%20 Paper.pdf
- Thompson, N. (2012). Living as form. In N. Thompson (Ed.), Living as form: Socially engaged art from 1991-2011 (pp. 16-33). New York, NY: Creative Time Books.
- Towsend, G. C. (1997). New PBL dental curriculum at the university of Adelaide. Journal of Dental Education, 61(4), 374-384.
- Wilkerson, L., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1996). Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: Theory and practice. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 68, 33-43.
- Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. M. (1995). Using action research as a vehicle for student teacher reflection: A social reconstructionist approach. In S. E. Noffke & R. B. Stevenson (Eds.), Educational action research: Becoming practically critical (pp. 13-30). New York, NY: Teachers College.
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(1)】March
Integrating Social Practice into the Specialty Program of Art and Design in Universities: An Example of a Value-Added Concept for the Local Culture
Author: Tun-Ju Liao (Department of Multimedia Design, National Formosa University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.1
Date：March 2018
Pages：207-245
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2018.63(1).07
Abstract：
Studies on theories related to practice-led art and design have been conducted for several years in Taiwan. The practice of an art program should be based on practicality. Furthermore, a practical program must have social and cultural significance with a broad vision to become a topic of conversation. Therefore, teachers of art education are responsible for turning abstract theoretical concepts into practical actions for students to overcome the problems faced in real-world learning. The process of learning may yield the power of affecting change through knowledge. Moreover, the Taiwanese ministries of education and technology have recently emphasized the social responsibility of universities and expected that higher education students can propose social programs for various human concerns and perform academic innovation to solve crucial social issues in Taiwan. Consequently, an 18-month social activity study was conducted. Students were grouped to explore the agricultural culture and the problems encountered in the towns of Yunlin County. The purposes of this study were: (1) To identify college students’ concerns toward local culture by applying practice-led program ideas and (2) To plan an art design curriculum on the basis of the local culture with a primary focus on social practice. The following results were obtained: (1) Programs based on practice and local culture develop students’ abilities related to cultural discovery, technological application, social innovation, and group care. (2) Programs based on social practice should stress planning, the learning community, and teachers and learners.
Keywords：local culture, practice-led research, problem-based learning, social practice, university art and design education