師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(2)六月刊（本期專題：數位學習的回顧與展望）

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「社會情緒學習｣專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/10/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「高齡教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/12/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「多元視角詮釋J. Bruner跨科際的教育科學研究之傳承」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/06/30)

期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(2)六月刊（本期專題：數位學習的回顧與展望）

回上一頁

取得中學教職的關鍵因素：運用決策樹探勘師資培育歷程作者:黃嘉莉(國立臺灣師範大學師資培育與就業輔導處)、葉怡芬(國立臺灣師範大學師資培育與就業輔導處)、許瑛玿(國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所)、曾元顯(國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所)

卷期：62卷第2期
日期：2017年6月
頁碼：89-123
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04

摘要：
本研究旨在透過大量的教育數據，運用資料探勘技術中的決策樹演算法，分析師資生於現行的師資培育歷程中，取得中學教師資格與取得正式教職的關鍵因素，以作為改進師資培育的參考。本研究以一所傳統師範體系的綜合大學2003~2010年入學的師資生為對象，運用開源碼軟體Weka分類演算法中的決策樹，針對每位師資生經歷5年培育歷程中修課與培訓的數據，進行資料探勘，用以瞭解取得教師證書與正式教職的關鍵因素。本研究主要結果為：一、三個主要學院（文、理、教育學院）的師資生取得教職所需年限有別（特別是理學院差異較大）；二、取得教師證書的關鍵因素是教育專業知識，而取得正式教職的關鍵因素則為專門知識與學科教學知識。此外，師資生拓展多元經驗亦有機會取得教職，且目前結果顯示教育實習成績並非是取得教師證書與教師工作的關鍵因素。本研究再以各類文獻驗證上述部分結果，提供師資培育較佳作法的參考建議。

關鍵詞：決策樹、教師證書、教職、學科教學知識

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

王麗雲、張民杰、張素貞（2013）。100學年度大三／四技三師資生調查描述性分析報告。取自https://teacher.edu.tw/web/file/report/hedu_100junior_p.pdf【Wang, L.-Y., Chang, M.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2013). A descriptive analysis for year 3 student teachers in 100 academic semester. Retrieved from: https://teacher.edu.tw/web/file/report/hedu_100junior_p.pdf】
朱苑瑜、葉玉珠（2003）。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報：教育類，48（1），41-66。doi:10.3966/2073753X2003044801003【Chu, Y.-Y., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2003). A study of influential to student teachers’ belief change. Journal of Taiwan University, 48(1), 41-66. doi:10.3966/2073753X2003044801003】
吳璧如（2002）。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊，10（2），45-64。【Wu, P.-J. (2002). A theoretical analysis of teachers’ perceived efficacy. Educational Research & Information, 10(2), 45-64.】
李俊湖、陳志強、陳禎祐、白博仁、陳文俊、劉淑甄…楊淑敏（2007）。少子化趨勢下臺灣師資培育之困境與省思。載於國立教育研究院籌備處（主編），第106期國小校長儲訓班專題研究彙編（pp. 45-58）。新北市：國立教育研究院籌備處。【Lee, J.-H., Chen, C.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Bai, P.-Y., Chen, W.-C., Liu, S.-C., …Yang, S.-M. (2007). Difficulties and reflections for cultivation of teachers in Taiwan under the dropping of birth rate. In Preparatory Office for National Academy for Educational Research (Ed.), Compilation of special topics in 106 primary school principals training class (pp. 45-58). New Taipei City, Taiwan: Preparatory Office for National Academy for Educational Research.】
李家宗（2011）。澳洲師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 333-352）。臺北市：教育部。【Lee, C.-T. (2011). Teacher training system and teachers’ quality in Australia. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Current situation of teachers’ cultivation system and teachers’ quality in different countries (pp. 333-352). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】

» 展開更多

王麗雲、張民杰、張素貞（2013）。100學年度大三／四技三師資生調查描述性分析報告。取自https://teacher.edu.tw/web/file/report/hedu_100junior_p.pdf【Wang, L.-Y., Chang, M.-C., & Chang, S.-C. (2013). A descriptive analysis for year 3 student teachers in 100 academic semester. Retrieved from: https://teacher.edu.tw/web/file/report/hedu_100junior_p.pdf】
朱苑瑜、葉玉珠（2003）。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報：教育類，48（1），41-66。doi:10.3966/2073753X2003044801003【Chu, Y.-Y., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2003). A study of influential to student teachers’ belief change. Journal of Taiwan University, 48(1), 41-66. doi:10.3966/2073753X2003044801003】
吳璧如（2002）。教師效能感之理論分析。教育研究資訊，10（2），45-64。【Wu, P.-J. (2002). A theoretical analysis of teachers’ perceived efficacy. Educational Research & Information, 10(2), 45-64.】
李俊湖、陳志強、陳禎祐、白博仁、陳文俊、劉淑甄…楊淑敏（2007）。少子化趨勢下臺灣師資培育之困境與省思。載於國立教育研究院籌備處（主編），第106期國小校長儲訓班專題研究彙編（pp. 45-58）。新北市：國立教育研究院籌備處。【Lee, J.-H., Chen, C.-C., Chen, C.-Y., Bai, P.-Y., Chen, W.-C., Liu, S.-C., …Yang, S.-M. (2007). Difficulties and reflections for cultivation of teachers in Taiwan under the dropping of birth rate. In Preparatory Office for National Academy for Educational Research (Ed.), Compilation of special topics in 106 primary school principals training class (pp. 45-58). New Taipei City, Taiwan: Preparatory Office for National Academy for Educational Research.】
李家宗（2011）。澳洲師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 333-352）。臺北市：教育部。【Lee, C.-T. (2011). Teacher training system and teachers’ quality in Australia. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Current situation of teachers’ cultivation system and teachers’ quality in different countries (pp. 333-352). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
周祝瑛（2003）。誰捉弄了臺灣教改？臺北市：心理。【Chou, C.-P. (2003). The great experiment of Taiwanese education (1987~2003). Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
周愚文、洪仁進、吳淑禎（2010）。國立臺灣師範大學學生對師資培育課程修習認知與意願之調查研究。中等教育，61（4），40-59。doi:10.6249/SE.2010.61.4.04【Chou, Y.-W., Hung, R.-J., & Wu, S.-C. (2010). A study of National Taiwan Normal University students’ cognitions and willingness to attend the teacher education program. Secondary Education, 61(4), 40-59. doi:10.6249/SE. 2010.61.4.04】
林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀（2007）。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，3（1），57-79。【Lin, H.-F., Wang, H.-L., & Teng, P.-H. (2007). The current situation, policy and prospect of elementary and secondary teacher education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 3(1), 57-79.】
洪志成（2005）。教師檢定測驗不是教師專業最後防線。現代教育論壇，12，462-477。【Hung, C.-C. (2005). Teacher certification test is not the last line of defense for teacher profession. Modern Education Forum, 12, 462-477.】
孫志麟（2001）。教師自我效能與教學行為的關係：實徵取向的分析。國立臺北師範學院學報，14，109-140。【Sun, C.-L. (2001). The relationship between teacher efficacy and teaching behavior: An empirical analysis. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 14, 109-140.】
張其祿（2003）。美國醫療管制政策之政治經濟分析。歐美研究，33（1），1-55。【Jang, C.-L. (2003). An empirical examination of the political economy of occupational licensing in the US healthcare system. A Journal of European and American Studies, 33(1), 1-55.】
許育齡（2006）。教師效能感研究的取向及限制：邁向變動教師效能感的探究。慈濟大學教育研究學刊，2，109-137。【Hsu, Y.-L. (2006). The research approaches and limitations of the sense of teacher efficacy: On the way to exploring the unstable sense of teacher efficacy. Tzu-Chi University Journal of The Educational Research, 2, 109-137.】
郭淑芳（2013）。我國師資培育數量規劃政策實施之效能分析。測驗統計年刊，21，61-86。【Kuo, S.-F. (2013). Effectiveness analysis of planning policies in the amount of teacher education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Measurement and Statistics, 21, 61-86.】
黃凱旻、金鈐（2003）。一個輔導中學數學實習教師教學概念轉變的行動研究。師大學報：科學教育類，48（1），23-46。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2003.48(1).02【Huang, K.-M., & Chin, C. (2003). The effect of mentoring on development of a secondary mathematics probationary teacher’s conception(s) of mathematics teaching: An action research. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Mathematics & Science Education, 48(1), 23-46. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2003.48(1).02】
黃嘉莉（2013）。標準本位師資培育理念與實踐。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學出版中心。【Huang, J.-L. (2013). The idea and practice of standards-based teacher education. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University Press.】
黃嘉莉（2015a）。臺灣師資培育制度市場化與專業化之回顧與省思。載於吳清基、黃嘉莉（主編），《師資培育法》20年來的回顧與前瞻（pp. 103-140）。臺北市：中華民國師範教育學會。【Huang, J.-L. (2015a). Retrospection and reflection on the marketization and specialization of teachers’ training system in Taiwan. In C.-J. Wu & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Twenty years’ review and forward-looking for “Teacher Education Law” (pp. 103-140). Taipei, Taiwan: China Teachers’ Education Association.】
黃嘉莉（2015b）。從美國edTPA表現評量檢視我國師資職前培育的發展。臺灣教育評論月刊，4（4），87-92。【Huang, J.-L. (2015b). Reviewing the development of pre-service cultivation of teachers in Taiwan–With America edTPA performance assessment. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 4(4), 87-92.】
黃嘉莉（2016）。第一期卓越師資培育獎學金學生教學準備度之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，12（1），1-38。doi:10.3966/181665042016031201001【Huang, J.-L. (2016). A study on the teaching preparedness of students funded by project for excellent teacher education scholarship (the first phase). Journal of Educational Research and Development, 12(1), 1-38. doi:10. 3966/181665042016031201001】
黃嘉莉、武佳瀅（2015）。我國教育實習學生知覺教師專業知能習得、運用與重要之研究。教育科學研究期刊，60（2），1-32。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).01【Huang, J.-L., & Wu, C.-Y. (2015). Student teacher perception of teacher education and professional knowledge acquisition, use, and importance in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(2), 1-32. doi:10. 6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).01】
葉連祺（2004）。中小學教師檢定方法相關課題之分析。載於國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所（主編），教師檢定之理論與實務會議論文集（pp. 29-43）。臺北市：國立教育資料館。【Yeh, L.-C. (2004). A analysis for assessment methods to teachers in primary and secondary schools. In National Education Research Institute of Hualien Normal College (Ed.), Proceedings of “Teacher Certification: Theory and Practice” conference (pp. 29-43). Taipei, Taiwan: National Institute of Educational Resources and Research.】
董宜佩、李詠絮（2011）。加拿大師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 203-224）。臺北市：教育部。【Dong, Y.-P., & Li, Y.-X. (2011). Teacher training system and teachers’ quality in Canada. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Current situation of teachers’ cultivation system and teachers’ quality in different countries (pp. 203-224). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
薛梨真、朱潤康（2007）。半年全時實習問題探究。教育研究與發展期刊，3（1），209-237。【Hsueh, L.-C., & Chu, J.-K. (2007). The problems of 6-month full time internship program. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 3(1), 209-237.】
羅天豪（2011）。歐盟師資培育制度與教師素質。載於楊深坑、黃嘉莉（主編），各國師資培育制度與教師素質現況（pp. 15-42）。臺北市：教育部。【Lo, T.-H. (2011). Teacher training system and teachers’ quality in European Union. In S.-K. Yang & J.-L. Huang (Eds.), Current situation of teachers’ cultivation system and teachers’ quality in different countries (pp. 15-42). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
Alexander, R. J. (1984). Innovation and continuity in the initial teacher curriculum. In R. J. Alexander, M. Craft, & J. Lynch (Eds.), Change in teacher education: Context and provision since Robbins (pp. 103-160). London, UK: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2013). edTPA. Retrieved from http://edtpa. aacte.org/
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497-511. doi:10.1177/0022487109348479
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bastick, T. (2000). Why teacher trainees choose the teaching profession: Comparing trainees in metropolitan and developing countries. International Review of Education, 46(3-4), 343-349.
Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of American and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032
Carver, C. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (2009). Using policy to improve teacher induction: Critical elements and missing pieces. Educational Policy, 23(2), 295-328. doi:10.1177/0895904807310 036
Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Constructing outcomes in teacher education: Policy, practice and pitfalls. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 9(11), 1-56. doi:10.14507/epaa.v9n11.2001
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44. doi:10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000
Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Teacher testing and the improvement of practice. Teaching Education, 12(1), 11-34. doi:10.1080/10476210123029
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. doi:10.1177/0022487105285962
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teacher College.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9
Dodl, N. R. (1973). Selecting competency outcomes for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 194-199. doi:10.1177/002248717302400305
Druva, C. A., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 467-479. doi:10.1002/tea.3660200509
Elam, S. (1971). Performance based teacher education: What is the state of the art? Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. doi:10.1080/00336297.1972.105 19731
Epstein, R. M., & Hundert, E. M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA, 287(2), 226-235. doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.226
Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurusamy, R. (Eds.). (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence.
Feiman-Nemser, S. (2003). What new teachers need to learn. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 25-29.
Feiman-Nemser, S., & Remillard, J. (1995). Perspectives on learning to teach. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED392749)
Freund, Y., & Mason, L. (1999, June). The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bled, Slovenia.
Goldhaber, D., & Anthony, E. (2004). Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410958
Graddy, E. (1991). Toward a general theory of occupational regulation. Social Science Quarterly, 72(4), 676-695.
Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 184-205. doi:10.3102/000 2831207312906
Haertel, E. H. (1991). New forms of teacher assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17(1), 3-29. doi:10.2307/1167328
Hanushek, E. A. (2002). Teacher quality. In L. T. Izumi & W. M. Evers (Eds.), Teacher quality (pp. 1-12). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.
Hertzberg, H. W. (1976). Competency based teacher education: Does it have a past or a future? Teachers College Record, 78(1), 1-21.
Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 395-407. doi:10.1177/0022487111409415
Howsam, R. B., Corrigan, D. C., & Denemark, G. W. (1985). Educating a profession. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Hoy, A. W. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anita_Hoy/publication/237218148_Changes_in_Teacher_Efficacy_During_the_Early_Years_of_Teaching/links/00463528a2036cfb4a000000.pdf
Ingvarson, L. (2005). Teaching standards: Foundations for professional development reform. In M. Fullan (Ed.), Fundamental change: International handbook of educational change (pp. 336- 361). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4454-2_17
Klug, J., Bruder, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Which variable predict teachers’ diagnostic competence when diagnosing students’ learning behavior at different stages of a teacher’s career? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(4), 461-484. doi:10.1080/13540602.2015.1082729
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles (pp. 227-247). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410605986
Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-97. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2003. 10.002
Labone, E. (2004). Teacher efficacy: Maturing the construct through research in alternative paradigms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(4), 341-359. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.013
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lindsey, M. (1973). Performance-based teacher education: Examination of a slogan. Journal for Teacher Education, 24(3), 180-186. doi:10.1177/002248717302400303
Löfström, E., Poom-Valicks, K., Hannula, M. S., & Mathews, S. R. (2010). Supporting emerging teacher identities: Can we identify teacher potential among students? European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 167-184. doi:10.1080/02619761003631831
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and science education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. doi:10. 1007/0-306-47217-1_4
Meijer, P. C., de Graaf, G., & Meirink, J. (2011). Key experiences in student teachers’ development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 17(1), 115-129. doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.538 502
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 877-904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Orey, M. A., & Nelson, W. A. (1997). The impact of situated cognition: Instructional design paradigms in transition. In C. R. Dills & A. J. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp. 269-282). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Park, H., & Byun, S.-Y. (2015). Why some countries attract more high-ability young students to teaching: Cross-National comparisons of students’ expectation of becoming a teacher. Comparative Education Review, 59(3), 523-549. doi:10.1086/681930
Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Robinson, S. (2013, November 8). AACTE Celebrates Official Launch of edTPA. Retrieved from http://edprepmatters.net/2013/11/announcing-edtpa-field-test-results-recommended-passing-score/
Rots, I., Aelterman, A., Vlerick, P., & Vermeulen, K. (2007). Teacher education, graduates’ teaching commitment and entrance into the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 543-556. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.012
Shulman, L. S. (1975). Teaching as clinical information processing. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED111807)
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 4-36). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Managing complexity in medicine and teaching. In S. M. Wilson (Ed.), The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach (pp. 251-271). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Siwatu, K. O., & Chesnut, S. R. (2014). The career development of preservice and inservice teachers: Why teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs matter. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 212-229). New York, NY: Routledge.
Tamir, P. (1991). Professional and personal knowledge of teachers and teacher educators. Teaching & Teacher Education, 7(3), 263-268. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90033-L
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tseng, Y.-H., Lin, C.-J., & Lin, Y.-I. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management: An International Journal, 43(5), 1216-1247. doi:10.1016/j.ipm. 2006.11.011
Turner-Bisset, R. (1999). The knowledge bases of the expert teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 39-55. doi:10.1080/0141192990250104
Valli, L., & Rennert-Ariev, P. (2002). New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 201-225. doi:10.1080/00220270 110093625
Webster, N. L., & Valeo, A. (2011). Teacher preparedness for a changing demographic of language learners. TESL Canada Journal, 28(2), 105-128. doi:10.18806/tesl.v28i2.1075
Whitty, G., & Willmott, E. (1991). Competence-based teacher education: Approaches and issues. Cambridge Journal of Education, 21(3), 309-318. doi:10.1080/0305764910210305
Wideen, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130-178. doi:10.2307/1170752
Wilson, A. H. (1982). Cross-cultural experiential learning for teachers. Theory Into Practice, 21(3), 184-192. doi:10.1080/00405848209543004
Wilson, S. M. (1995). Performance-based assessment of teachers. In S. W. Soled (Ed.), Assessment, testing and evaluation in teacher education (pp. 189-219). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, E. R. (1987). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104-124). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Witten, I. H., Frank, E., & Hall, M. A. (2011). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19715-5

中文APA引文格式	黃嘉莉、葉怡芬、許瑛玿、曾元顯(2017)。取得中學教職的關鍵因素：運用決策樹探勘師資培育歷程。教育科學研究期刊，62(2)，89-123。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04
APA Format	Huang, J.-L., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., &Tseng, Y.-H. (2017). Critical factors of becoming secondary school teachers: Mining the process of teacher education by decision trees. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 89-123. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04

Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(2)】June (Special Issue: Digital Learning: Retrospect and Prospect)

Top

Critical Factors of Becoming Secondary School Teachers: Mining the Process of Teacher Education by Decision Trees Author: Jia-Li Huang(Teacher Education and Careers Service, National Taiwan Normal University), Yi-Fen Yeh(Teacher Education and Careers Service, National Taiwan Normal University), Ying-Shao Hsu(Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Yuen-Hsien Tseng(Graduate Institute of Library & Information Studies, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 62, No.2
Date：June 2017
Pages：89-123
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04

Abstract：

This study aimed to identify the critical factors leading teacher students to successfully receive teacher certificates and become secondary school teachers by mining vast educational data using decision trees in order to provide actionable suggestions to improve teacher education. The five-year learning evidence of the teacher students enrolled during 2003-2010 school years from a normal university in Taiwan was collected and then analyzed with the open source data mining software Weka by use of its decision tree algorithms. The major findings include: (1) Years spent to receive a teacher job were different among the three major colleges, namely colleges of Education, Liberal Arts, and Science; (2) Education knowledge is the critical predictor to receive a teacher certificate, while pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge play the most critical roles to obtain a teacher job. In addition, more practical experiences were also useful to obtain a teacher job, and the score of education practicum was an ineffective predictor, as the current result shows. This study verifies part of the findings with previous work to provide solid suggestions for better teacher education practice.

Keywords：Critical Factors of Becoming Secondary School Teachers: Mining the Process of Teacher Education by Decision Trees

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(2)六月刊（本期專題：數位學習的回顧與展望） 回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(2)】June (Special Issue: Digital Learning: Retrospect and Prospect) Top

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 62卷(2017) - 【教育科學研究期刊】62(2)六月刊（本期專題：數位學習的回顧與展望）

回上一頁

Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(2)】June (Special Issue: Digital Learning: Retrospect and Prospect)

Top