師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(2)六月刊（本期專題：師資培育：檢討、成效與前瞻）

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「社會情緒學習｣專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/10/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「高齡教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/12/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「多元視角詮釋J. Bruner跨科際的教育科學研究之傳承」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/06/30)

期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(2)六月刊（本期專題：師資培育：檢討、成效與前瞻）

回上一頁

（專題）師資培育制度變革與師範校院轉型：社會制度論的分析與反思作者:謝卓君(國立東華大學教育行政與管理學系)

卷期：61卷第2期
日期：2016年6月
頁碼：29-56
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).02

摘要：
多元化師資培育制度自1994年《師資培育法》實施至今已超過20年，這個制度的變化過程中，原本獨占師資培育管道的師範校院面臨機構轉型的壓力。本研究之目的在於從組織社會學的觀點，瞭解多元化師資培育制度變革可能對於師資培育機構造成的影響。研究以社會制度論為理論架構，採取個案研究法，透過政策文本分析與訪談，分析我國幾近兩世紀以來師資培育制度的變化，並探究師範校院在此一過程中的因應與轉型。研究結果發現，早期的師資培育制度改革聚焦制度環境忽略技術環境，個案機構採順服制度以取得組織合法性；發展至後期，制度環境與技術環境的差距逐漸縮小，個案機構需要同時考量組織合法性與增加技術效率以提升組織競爭力。為因應師資培育制度的變化，個案組織採取強制性、模仿性與規範性等多種機制，並反映出鬆散的結構特性。最後，根據研究結果對於當前師資培育制度的發展與師範校院的困境，提出批判反省。

關鍵詞：師資培育、師範校院、組織社會學、新制度論、機構轉型

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

立法院（1995）。立法院公報，84（28）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501558&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=84051300&page=%E9%A0%81431-442【Legislative Yuan. (1995). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 84(28). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501558&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=84051300&page=%E9%A0%81431-442】
立法院（1996a）。立法院公報，85（25）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501517&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8405030c&page=%E9%A0%81477-545【Legislative Yuan. (1996a). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 85(25). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501517&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8405030c&page=%E9%A0%81477-545】
立法院（1996b）。立法院公報，85（29）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9603054&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506050a&page=%E9%A0%8131-222【Legislative Yuan. (1996a). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 85(29). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9603054&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506050a&page=%E9%A0%8131-222】
立法院（1996c）。立法院公報，85（36）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=G9605355&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506290a&page=%E9%A0%8171-146【Legislative Yuan. (1996c). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 85(36). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=G9605355&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506290a&page=%E9%A0%8171-146】
立法院（1998）。立法院公報，87（40）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE= search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9809249&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8710210c&page=%E9%A0%81311-341【Legislative Yuan. (1998). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 87(40). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9809249&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8710210c&page=%E9%A0%81311-341】

» 展開更多

立法院（1995）。立法院公報，84（28）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501558&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=84051300&page=%E9%A0%81431-442【Legislative Yuan. (1995). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 84(28). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501558&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=84051300&page=%E9%A0%81431-442】
立法院（1996a）。立法院公報，85（25）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501517&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8405030c&page=%E9%A0%81477-545【Legislative Yuan. (1996a). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 85(25). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9501517&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8405030c&page=%E9%A0%81477-545】
立法院（1996b）。立法院公報，85（29）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9603054&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506050a&page=%E9%A0%8131-222【Legislative Yuan. (1996a). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 85(29). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9603054&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506050a&page=%E9%A0%8131-222】
立法院（1996c）。立法院公報，85（36）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=G9605355&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506290a&page=%E9%A0%8171-146【Legislative Yuan. (1996c). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 85(36). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=G9605355&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8506290a&page=%E9%A0%8171-146】
立法院（1998）。立法院公報，87（40）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE= search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9809249&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8710210c&page=%E9%A0%81311-341【Legislative Yuan. (1998). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 87(40). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=D9809249&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=8710210c&page=%E9%A0%81311-341】
立法院（2002）。立法院公報，91（37）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=E0030144&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=9106050a&page=%E 9%A0%81147-167【Legislative Yuan. (2002). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 91(37). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/merge_pdf.hpg&sysid=E0030144&jid=79001516&type=g&vol=9106050a&page=%E9%A0%81147-167】
立法院（2011）。立法院公報，100（53）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/show_gaztext.hpg&sysid=E1178873【Legislative Yuan. (2011). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 100(53). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/show_gaztext.hpg&sysid=E1178873】
立法院（2013）。立法院公報，102（84）。取自http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/hypage.cgi?HYPAGE =search/show_gaztext.hpg&sysid=E1407206【Legislative Yuan. (2013). The Legislative Yuan Gazette, 102(84). Retrieved from http://twinfo.ncl.edu.tw/tiqry/ hypage.cgi?HYPAGE=search/show_gaztext.hpg&sysid=E1407206】
吳得源（2003）。論國際關係社會建構論與組織社會學新制度論之關連性。台灣政治學刊，7（1），3-37。【Wu, D.-Y. (2003). On the linkage between social constructivism in international relations and new institutionalism in sociological and organizational analysis. Journal of Research in Taiwan Political Science, 7(1), 3-37.】
林綺雲（2002）。制度學派的理論反思：台灣教育組織的變革經驗。社會科學論叢，40，111-133。【Lin, C.-U. (2002). The critique of institutionalism: Experience research on organizational transformation of technological and vocational education system in Taiwan. Review of Social Sciences, 40, 111-133.】
紀金山（2002）。師資培育制度變革的社會學分析。嘉義縣：南華大學教育社會學研究所。【Chi, C.-S. (2002). Sociological analysis of teacher education system reform. Chiayi County, Taiwan: Institute of Sociology of Education, Nanhua University.】
教育部（2012）。中華民國師資培育白皮書。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2012). White paper for teacher education of R.O.C. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
曹仁德、梁忠銘（2002）。臺灣師資培育制度變遷之考察：師範院校、教育院系所培育機構的變革。臺東師院學報，13（下），211-240。【Tsau, R.-D., & Liang, C.-M. (2002). A study of the teacher education system in Taiwan. Journal of National Taitung Teachers College, 13(down), 211-240.】
黃源河、符碧真（2009）。一樣軌跡兩樣情：美國與我國師資培育機構轉型與教師質量之比較。教育科學研究期刊，54（4），171-200。doi:10.3966/2073753X2009125404007【Hwang, Y. R., & Fwu, B.-J. (2009). Similar routes but different paths: Teacher preparation, teacher quantity and quality in the U.S. and Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(4), 171-200. doi:10.3966/2073 753X2009125404007】
黃嘉莉（2008）。教師專業制度的社會學分析。師大學報：教育類，53（3），125-151。doi:10.3966/　2073753X2008125303006【Huang, J.-L. (2008). A sociological analysis of the teaching profession in Taiwan. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 53(3), 125-151. doi:10.3966/2073753X2008125303006】
楊深坑（2009）。德國師資培育認證制度研究。教育科學研究期刊，54（2），29-57。doi:10.3966/　2073753X2009065402002【Yang, S.-K. (2009). A study on teacher education accreditation system in Germany. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 54(2), 29-57. doi:10.3966/2073753X2009065402002】
靳知勤（2009）。中等科學師資培育機構評鑑指標之發展研究。科學教育學刊，17（4），275- 292。【Chin, C.-C. (2009). A study of the development of indicators for evaluating secondary science teacher education programs in Taiwan. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 17(4), 275-292.】
謝卓君（2004）。我國師資培育法之政策文本分析。教育政策論壇，7（2），1-28。【Hsieh, C.-C. (2004). Policy textual analysis of teacher education law in Taiwan. Educational Policy Forum, 7(2), 1-28.】
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Davies, S., Quirke, L., & Aurini, J. (2006). The new institutionalism goes to the market: The challenge of rapid growth in Private K-12 Education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 103-122). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991a). Inroduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-33). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991b). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policy- making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275-296. doi:10.2307/422246
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalism. Political Studies, 44(5), 936-957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Levy, D. C. (2006). The worldwide expansion of private higher education: Challenges for the new institutionalism. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 143-162). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Meyer, H.-D., & Rowan, B. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1978). The structure of educational organizations. In J. W. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations: Ritual and rationality (pp. 78-109). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2007). Higher education as an institution. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 187-221). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and reality. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
Ramirez, F. O. (2006). Growing commonalities and persistent differences in higher education: Universities between global models and national legacies. In H.-D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 123-142). New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rowan, B., & Miskel, C. G. (1999). Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 359-383). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sadovnik, A. R. (2007). Theory and research in sociology of education. In A. R. Sadovnik (Ed.), Sociology of education: A critical reader (pp. 3-23). New York, NY: Routledge.
Scott, W. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164-182). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108-140). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

中文APA引文格式	謝卓君(2016)。師資培育制度變革與師範校院轉型：社會制度論的分析與反思。教育科學研究期刊，61(2)，29-56。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).02
APA Format	Hsieh, C.-C. (2016). Teacher Education Reform and Its Impact on Teachers Colleges in Taiwan: An Analysis and Reflections Based on Sociological Institutionalism. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 29-56. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).02

Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(2)】June (Special Issue: Teacher Education: Reflection, Effect, and Prospect)

Top

(Special Issue) Teacher Education Reform and Its Impact on Teachers Colleges in Taiwan: An Analysis and Reflections Based on Sociological Institutionalism Author: Chuo-Chun Hsieh(Department of Educational Administration and Management, National Dong Hwa University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 61, No. 2
Date：June 2016
Pages：29-56
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(2).02

Abstract：

The 1994 Teacher Education Act marked the start of a more diversified system of teacher training in Taiwan. Subsequently, the number of teacher education providers increased substantially; consequently, the normal universities and colleges, which had been the dominant organizations participating in teacher preparation in Taiwan, were pressured to adapt. To understand how teacher colleges have adjusted to the reform of the teacher education system, this study conducted a textual analysis of relevant documents and policies released during 1994-2014 and interviewed members of a selected teacher college. Sociological institutionalism was utilized as a theoretical framework to analyze the institutional changes and organizational adaptations. The research findings showed that at the earlier stage of the teacher education reform, the prevailing trend was to focus on changing the institutional environment, and the case study college complied with this orientation in both letter and spirit to maintain its organizational legitimacy. At the later stage, however, the teacher education reform started incorporating additional changes related to the technical environment, and this caused the case study teachers college to increase its focus on technical efficiency to strengthen its organizational competitiveness. The experience of the case study college when choosing among diverse mechanisms (i.e., coercive, mimetic, and normative) to adapt to institutional change revealed that the organization in question exhibited a loosely coupled organizational structure. This paper offers reflections on the institutional reform of teacher education as well as the transformation of the case study teachers college.

Keywords：teacher education, teachers college, sociology of organization, new institutionalism, organizational change

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(2)六月刊（本期專題：師資培育：檢討、成效與前瞻） 回上一頁

（專題）師資培育制度變革與師範校院轉型：社會制度論的分析與反思 作者:謝卓君(國立東華大學教育行政與管理學系)

Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(2)】June (Special Issue: Teacher Education: Reflection, Effect, and Prospect) Top

(Special Issue) Teacher Education Reform and Its Impact on Teachers Colleges in Taiwan: An Analysis and Reflections Based on Sociological Institutionalism Author: Chuo-Chun Hsieh(Department of Educational Administration and Management, National Dong Hwa University)

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 61卷(2016) - 【教育科學研究期刊】61(2)六月刊（本期專題：師資培育：檢討、成效與前瞻）

回上一頁

（專題）師資培育制度變革與師範校院轉型：社會制度論的分析與反思作者:謝卓君(國立東華大學教育行政與管理學系)

Journal directory listing - Volume 61 (2016) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【61(2)】June (Special Issue: Teacher Education: Reflection, Effect, and Prospect)

Top