期刊目錄列表 - 60卷(2015) - 【教育科學研究期刊】60(2) 六月刊

以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養 作者:陳冠利(國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心)、劉湘瑤(國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所)、陳柏熹(國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系)、黃書涵(國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所)

卷期:60卷第2期
日期:2015年6月
頁碼:167-196
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06

摘要:
能源素養為知識、態度與行為組成的多面向架構,為瞭解學生能源素養的表現情形,本研究以先前發展的能源素養架構為基礎,對應各指標內涵設計六個情境式題組作為評量工具,以全國國、高中學生為施測對象,共取得2,066份有效樣本。結果顯示,學生的能源素養尚需加強,尤其是評估與判斷國際能源議題的素養指標能力,另從評量試題的文字作答分析發現,學生對溫室效應成因和生質能源等議題持有迷思概念。相關分析呈現知識與行為面向的關聯性較態度與行為的關聯性高。對節能減碳的看法和參加研習次數與素養表現有正相關;年級愈高的學生在素養的整體表現上愈好。本研究建議發展有效的能源課程及教學方式,作為能源教育推動策略之參考。
 

關鍵詞:能源素養、能源教育、情境式題組
 

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 王如哲、黃月純(2011)。節能減碳教育:國際觀點與案例。臺北市:高等教育。【Wang, R.-J., & Huang, Y.-C. (2011). Energy education: International perspectives. Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】
  2. 宋曜廷、黃信樽、陳學志(2012)。能源與氣候變遷概念之內容分析─以自然與生活科技領域為例。教科書研究,5(2),1-30。【Sung, Y.-T., Huang, H.-T., & Chen, H.-C. (2012). Content analysis of energy and climate change concepts in elementary and middle school scientific textbooks. Journal of Textbook Research, 5(2), 1-30.】
  3. 林煥祥(2009)。科學素養的評量。科學發展,438,66-69。【Lin, H.-S. (2009). Assessment of scientific literacy. Science Development, 438, 66-69.】
  4. 林樹聲、黃柏鴻(2009)。國小六年級學生在社會性科學議題教學中之論證能力研究-不同學業成就學生間之比較。科學教育學刊,17(2),111-133。【Lin, S.-S., & Huang, P.-H. (2009). Students’ constructing argumentation about a socioscientific issue-The differences between sixth graders with different levels of academic achievement. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 17(2), 111-133.】
  5. 邱皓政2005)。量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術。臺北市:雙葉書廊。【Chiou, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods II: Statistical principles and analytic techniques. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式陳冠利、劉湘瑤、陳柏熹、黃書涵(2015)。以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養。教育科學研究期刊60(2),167-196。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06
APA FormatChen, K.-L., Liu, S.-Y., Chen, P.-H., & Huang, S.-H. (2015). Using Contextualized Assessment to Measure the Energy Literacy of Middle and High School Students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(2), 167-96. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06
 

Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(2)】June

Using Contextualized Assessment to Measure the Energy Literacy of Middle and High School Students Author: Kuan-Li Chen(Science Education Center, National Taiwan Normal University), Shiang-Yao Liu(Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Po-Hsi Chen(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Su-Han Huang(Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 60, No. 2
Date:June 2015
Pages:167-196
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).06

Abstract:

Energy literacy is multidimensional, comprising broad content knowledge as well as affect and behavior. In this study, an assessment was designed using six contextualized test units to examine student energy literacy. A total of 2,066 secondary students participated in the survey. The results indicated that student energy literacy is low, particularly with respect to the dimension of “reasoning on energy controversies”. Qualitative analyses of student written responses to various question items revealed that students have misconceptions of biomass energy and misconstrue the sources of greenhouse gas. Inter-correlation among the dimensions of energy literacy indicated that energy knowledge and behavior are more closely correlated with each other than are affect and behavior. The students in southern Taiwan scored higher on energy literacy assessments than did the students in northern, central, as well as eastern Taiwan. These findings are a reference for developing energy-related curricula and educational materials to improve student energy literacy.

Keywords:energy literacy, energy education, contextualized test unit