期刊目錄列表 - 56卷(2011) - 【教育科學研究期刊】56(3) 九月刊

摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成效 作者:陸怡琮(國立屏東教育大學教育心理與輔導學系副教授)

卷期:56卷第3期
日期:2011年9月
頁碼:91-118
DOI:10.3966/2073753X2011095603004

摘要:

本研究主要目的在設計適用於國小高年級國語科的摘要策略教學模式,並檢視此模式對提升學生摘要能力和閱讀理解之效果。研究設計採控制組前後測的準實驗設計,以屏東縣2所國小各兩班五年級學生為對象,隨機分配每校中的一班為實驗組,接受融入國語科的摘要策略教學,另一班為控制組,進行國語評量卷的習寫與回饋。教學前、後及教學結束後1個月,進行摘要能力和閱讀理解的測量,實驗組學生在教學結束後填答回饋問卷。結果顯示,摘要策略教學對提升摘要能力有立即與維持的效果,且在追蹤後測階段對低能力學生摘要表現的促進效果大於對高能力學生,但對促進閱讀理解則無顯著效果,學生對摘要策略與教學都有非常正向的態度。

關鍵詞:國小學童、摘要能力、摘要策略教學、閱讀理解

《詳全文》 檔名

中文APA引文格式陸怡琮(2011)。摘要策略教學對提升國小五年級學童摘要能力與閱讀理解的成效 。教育科學研究期刊56(3),91-118。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011095603004
APA FormatLu, I.-C. (2011). Examining the Effects of Summarization Strategy Instruction on Summary Skills and Reading Comprehension of Fifth Graders. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(3), 91-118. doi:10.3966/2073753X2011095603004

Journal directory listing - Volume 56 (2011) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【56(3)】September

Examining the Effects of Summarization Strategy Instruction on Summary Skills and Reading Comprehension of Fifth Graders Author: I-Chung Lu(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Pingtung University of Education)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 56, No. 3
Date:September 2011
Pages:91-118
DOI:10.3966/2073753X2011095603004

Abstract:

This study designed a summarization strategy instruction for elementary students and examined its effects on the summary skills and reading comprehension of fifth graders. Four fifth-grade classes from two elementary schools in Pingtung County participated in the study. Using a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest control group design, one class in each school was assigned to the experimental group, which received the summarization strategy instruction, while the other class in each school served as the control group, which took practice tests on language arts and received feedback from the teacher. Before, immediately after, and four weeks following the experiment, both groups were tested on summary skills and reading comprehension. The experimental group also filled out a questionnaire after the experiment on their perceptions of the instruction. The results indicated that the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group did in summary skills in both the posttest and delayed posttest and interaction effect was found between instruction and reading ability in the delayed posttest. The two instruction groups did not differ in reading comprehension after the experiment. Students in the experimental group were positive toward the strategy and the instruction.

Keywords:elementary school children, summary skills, summarization strategy instruction, reading comprehension