師大學報 - 教育科學研究期刊 - 期刊目錄列表 - 69卷(2024) - 【教育科學研究期刊】69(3)九月刊(學習歷程檔案評量：挑戰與創新)

以作者名、篇名、關鍵字或DOI查詢

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

[Guide for Submission]

稿約

[Style for Thesis Writing]

論文撰寫體例

[Review of Research Papers]

論文審查要點

[The Copyright]

著作權處理要點

[Flow of Review System]

審查制度流程

[Regulations Governing]

編審委員會設置要點

[Editorial Board]

本年度編審委員

[Advisory Board]

本年度諮詢委員

[Form Download]

相關表單下載

《教育科學研究期刊》「社會情緒學習｣專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/10/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「高齡教育」專題徵稿(截稿日至2024/12/31) 《教育科學研究期刊》「多元視角詮釋J. Bruner跨科際的教育科學研究之傳承」專題徵稿(截稿日至2025/06/30)

期刊目錄列表 - 69卷(2024) - 【教育科學研究期刊】69(3)九月刊(學習歷程檔案評量：挑戰與創新)

回上一頁

計畫行為理論高中生觀點分析學習歷程檔案實施與效益之研究作者:國家教育研究院教育制度及政策研究中心、國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系、國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系簡瑋成

卷期：69卷第3期
日期：2024年09月
頁碼：31-71
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0002

摘要：
本研究以計畫行為理論為基礎，聚焦高中生對學習歷程檔案的信念、態度、主觀規範、知覺行為控制、意向與投入的狀況和關係模型，並探討投入行為對核心素養、生涯規劃與升學選擇的影響。本研究以紙本問卷調查臺灣高中生，最終回收有效問卷3,638份。研究結論包括高中生對學習歷程檔案良好結果助益信念有所不足，態度略偏負面，不過，擁有準備學習歷程檔案的資源與機會還算充足，且尚能自主掌控學習歷程檔案的準備。而教育利害關係人對學習歷程檔案略表不認同，但是，認為高中生應努力充實學習歷程檔案。再者，高中生擁有學習歷程檔案準備的意願與實際投入行為，並以知覺行為控制為影響高中生準備意願與投入行為的最重要因素。最後，研究發現高中生參與學習歷程檔案的準備有益於孕育核心素養與發展生涯規劃，且略有利於提高升學意向，對部分入學管道選擇也發揮了微小影響。對未來研究建議方面，建議以高中生學習歷程資料庫中學生實際上傳的資料進行客觀分析，並建立長期追蹤調查資料，以分析趨勢變化。同時，也建議學校端與政府政策應加強宣導學習歷程檔案與制度調整，學校應藉由學習歷程檔案實踐素養導向教育與生涯發展教育的理念，教師也應著重加強學生對學習歷程檔案的自信心與自主權。

關鍵詞：生涯規劃、計畫行為理論、核心素養、高中生、學習歷程檔案

《詳全文》

參考文獻：

» 展開更多

王淑美、岳修平、黃昱凱、康維真（2020）。科系認同對管理學院大學生創業意圖的調節作用。教育科學研究期刊，65（4），1-29。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0001

【Wang, S.-M., Yueh, H.-P., Huang, Y.-K., & Kang, W.-C. (2020). Entrepreneurial intentions of management students: Moderating effects of department identification. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0001】

江怡慧、林宛儒、賴奕仲、趙淑均（2011）。影響高職畢業生選擇學校因素之研究。明新學報，37（2），143-152。https://doi.org/10.29688/MHJ.201108.0011

【Chiang, Y.-H., Lin, W.-R., Lai, Y.-C., & Jhso, S.-J. (2011). Study on the determinants of school selection for the vocational high school graduate. Ming Hsin Journal, 37(2), 143-152. https://doi.org/10.29688/ MHJ.201108.0011】

李茂能（2006）。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用：Graphics & Basic。心理。

【Li, M.-N. (2006). An introduction to Amos and its uses in scale development: Graphics & basic. Psychological.】

李隆盛（2004）。學生學習檔案的5W1H。師友月刊，445，42-45。https://doi.org/10.6437/ EM.200407.0042

【Li, L.-S. (2004). The 5W1H of student learning portfolios. The Educator Bimonthly, 445, 42-45. https://doi.org/ 10.6437/EM.200407.0042】

林海清（2021）。高中學習歷程檔案評析。教育研究月刊，329，35-50。https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602021090329003

【Lin, H.-C. (2021). A review on high school learning portfolio. Journal of Education Research, 329, 35-50. https://doi.org/10.53106/168063602021090329003】

林國明（2020）。學習歷程檔案審議計畫。https://www.108epo.com/courses.php

【Lin, K.-M. (2020). Learning portfolio review plan. https://www.108epo.com/courses.php】

林錦郎（2016）。從計畫行為理論探討數位學習平台知識分享行為。全球商業經營管理學報，8，43-55。

【Lin, C.-L. (2016). Study on knowledge sharing by e-learning platform from the aspect of theory of planned behavior. Journal of Global Business Management, 8, 43-55.】

邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL SIMPLIS原理與應用（二版）。雙葉書廊。

【Chiou, H.-J. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling with LISREL / SIMPLIS (2nd ed.). Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】

施佳伸、羅希哲、王仁俊（2023）。以模糊德懷術分析技術型高中製作優良學習歷程檔案的關鍵指標。工業科技教育學刊，16，168-179。https://doi.org/10.6306/JITE.202307_(16).0010

【Shi, C.-S., Lo, S.-C., & Wang, J.-J. (2023). Using fuzzy Dehuai technique analyzing the key indicators of making excellent learning history archives in technical high schools. Journal of Industrial Technology Education, 16, 168-179. https://doi.org/10.6306/JITE.202307_(16).0010】

范熾文、黃瓊玉（2014）。花蓮地區高中學生對大學多元入學方案看法之研究。學校行政，94，26-49。https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002014110094002

【Fan, C.-W., & Huang, C.-Y. (2014). A study from the view of senior high school students on the policy of university multiple entrance program in Hualien area as an example. School Administrators, 94, 26-49. https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002014110094002】

張盈潔、王詩文、呂莉婷（2021）。應用解構式計畫行為理論探討高中學生對3D虛擬實境反毒課程使用意圖之質性研究。教育科學研究期刊，66（4），133-165。https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202112_66(4).0005

【Chang, Y.-C., Wang, S.-W., & Lu, L.-T. (2021). Examining high school students’ intention to use 3D VR teaching materials against substance abuse. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(4), 133-165. https://doi.org/ 10.6209/JORIES.202112_66(4).0005】

教育部（2019）。高級中等學校學生學習歷程檔案作業要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/ LawContent.aspx?id = GL001916

【Ministry of Education. (2019). Guidelines for student learning portfolio in senior secondary schools. https:// edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id = GL001916】

教育部（2021）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/ file/35950/96151.pdf

【Ministry of Education. (2021). General guidelines of the 12-year basic education curriculum. https://cirn.moe. edu.tw/Upload/file/35950/96151.pdf】

教育部統計處（2022）。統計表快速查詢。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n= 1AC243AF6EF5E5DD&s = EDC4A4E717ED32CF

【Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2022). Quick search for statistical tables. https://depart.moe. edu.tw/ED4500/cp.aspx?n = 1AC243AF6EF5E5DD&s = EDC4A4E717ED32CF】

黃城、卓民道、林政谷、陳冠州、彭煥勝、黃瑩、鄭勝耀、洪儷瑜（2014）。教育公平：理論與實務。高等教育。

【Hwang, C., Cheng, M.-D., Lin, C.-K., Chen, K.-C., Peng, H.-S., Huang, C.-Y., Cheng, S.-Y., & Hung, L.-Y. (2014). Equity in education: Theory and practice. Higher Education.】

劉兆明（2018）。評量尺規的概念與設計。https://aca.ntua.edu.tw/uploads/files/%E8%A9%95%E9% 87%8F%E5%B0%BA%E8%A6%8F%E7%9A%84%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E8%88%87%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88-%E5%8A%89%E5%85%86%E6%98%8E%E9%A1%A7%E5%95%8F.pdf

【Liu, C.-M. (2018). The concept and design of assessment rubrics. https://aca.ntua.edu.tw/uploads/files/%E8% A9%95%E9%87%8F%E5%B0%BA%E8%A6%8F%E7%9A%84%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E8%88%87%E8%A8%AD%E8%A8%88-%E5%8A%89%E5%85%86%E6%98%8E%E9%A1%A7%E5%95%8F.pdf】

劉源俊（2019）。這樣的「學習歷程檔案」真實嗎？點教育，1（1），8-9。

【Liu, Y.-J. (2019). Is such a “learning portfolio” authentic? Dot Education, 1(1), 8-9.】

蔡長書、蔡宗宏、楊美玲（2005）。影響高中學生選校態度與決定因素之探討—以東部某國立大學為例。慈濟技術學院學報，7，237-254。

【Tsai, C.-S., Tsai, C.-H., & Yang, M.-L. (2005). Influence on senior high school students’ attitude to school choice and its effective factors: A case study on National University in Eastern Taiwan. Journal of Tzu Chi College of Technology, 7, 237-254.】

賴羿蓉（2004）。歷程檔案評量在通識課程中的應用規劃。朝陽學報，9，315-335。

【Lai, Y.-J. (2004). The application of portfolio assessment in general education. Chaoyang Journal, 9, 315-335.】

Ahmed, E., & Ward, R. (2016). A comparison of competing technology acceptance models to explore personal, academic and professional portfolio acceptance behaviour. Journal of Computers in Education, 3, 169-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0058-1
Ajayi, K. F. (2022). School choice and educational mobility: Lessons from secondary school applications in Ghana. Journal of Human Resources. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0417-8714R2
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice Hall.
Alvarez, A. R., & Moxley, D. P. (2004). The student portfolio in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 24(1), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n01_06
Arter, J. A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 11(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992. 1992.tb00230.x
Avery, C., & Hoxby, C. M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 239-302). University of Chicago Press.
Avery, C., & Kane, T. J. (2004). Student perceptions of college opportunities: The Boston COACH program. In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 355-394). University of Chicago Press.
Avery, C., Howell, J. S., & Page, L. (2014). A review of the role of college applications on students’ postsecondary outcomes. College Board.
Bánhegyi, M., & Fajt, B. (2023). Improving university students’ cooperation skills through portfolio projects: A pilot study. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 6(1), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.2022.00053
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2 nd.). Routledge.
Campbell, M. I., & Schmidt, K. J. (2005). Polaris: An undergraduate online portfolio system that encourages personal reflection and career planning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(5), 931-942.
Carrell, S. E., & Sacerdote, B. (2012). Late interventions matter too: The case of college coaching New Hampshire (No. w19031). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Chade, H., Lewis, G., & Smith, L. (2014). Student portfolios and the college admissions problem. Review of Economic Studies, 81(3), 971-1002. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdu003
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cronan, T. P., Mullins, J. K., & Douglas, D. E. (2018). Further understanding factors that explain freshman business students’ academic integrity intention and behavior: Plagiarism and sharing homework. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551- 015-2988-3
Danielson, C., & Abrutyn, L. (1997). An introduction to using portfolios in the classroom. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Davis, L. E., Ajzen, I., Saunders, J., & Williams, T. (2002). The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 810-819. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.810
Dewberry, C., & Jackson, D. J. R. (2018). An application of the theory of planned behavior to student retention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jvb.2018.03.005
Didarloo, A., Sharafkhani, N., Gharaaghaji, R., & Sheikhi, S. (2017). Application of theory of planned behavior to improve obesity preventive lifestyle among students: A school-based interventional study. International Journal of Pediatrics, 5(11), 6057-6067. https://doi.org/ 10.22038/ijp.2017.24040.2044
Downs, D. S., Graham, G. M., Yang, S., Bargainnier, S., & Vasil, J. (2006). Youth exercise intention and past exercise behavior: Examining the moderating influences of sex and meeting exercise recommendations. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 77(1), 91-99. https://doi.org/ 10.5641/027013606X13080769704000
Drier, H. N., Jesen, L., Kompelien, K., Lavary, E., Magnuson, C., Teddlie, J., Voltaggio, L., & Whitfield, E. (1994). Planning for life program guidebook. Career planning: Definition, improvement ideas and self-review process. Army Recruiting Command.
Efendi, Z., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2017). Implementation of portfolio assessment in teaching English writing. English Education Journal, 8(2), 187-198.
Farr, R., & Tone, B. (1994). Portfolio and performance assessment: Helping students evaluate their progress as readers and writers. Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Fishbein, M. A., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley.
Fishbein, M. A., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2), 130-132.
Fu, C. (2014). Equilibrium tuition, applications, admissions, and enrollment in the college market. Journal of Political Economy, 122(2), 225-281. https://doi.org/10.1086/675503
Gallagher, P. (2001). An evaluation of a standard-based portfolio. Nurse Education Today, 21(3), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2000.0536
Gencel, I. E. (2017). The effect of portfolio assessments on metacognitive skills and on attitudes toward a course. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 17(1), 293-319. https://doi.org/ 10.12738/estp.2017.1.0378
Gillard, D. (1997). Report of the national committee of inquiry into higher education (The Dearing Report). http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/dearing1997/dearing1997.html
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
Hanson, M. F., & Gilkerson, D. (1999). Portfolio assessment: More than ABCs and 123s. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(2), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026044126583
Harding, T. S., Mayhew, M. J., Finelli, C. J., & Carpenter, D. D. (2007). The theory of planned behavior as a model of academic dishonesty in engineering and humanities undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior, 17(3), 255-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420701519239
Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Hoxby, C. M., & Avery, C. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students (No. w18586). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ibrahim, M. & Callaway, R. (2018). Investigating the effect of using E-portfolio on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, proficiency and intention to use technology in their future classroom. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), Proceedings of edmedia: World conference on educational media and technology (pp. 129-140). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Ingram, K. L., Cope, J. G., Harju, B. L., & Wuensch, K. L. (2000). Applying to graduate school: A test of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2), 215-225.
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(3), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4rd ed.). Guilford.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 001316447003000308
Lee, P. H., Kuo, S. Y., Ou, T. S., Lin, Y. K., Chi, M. J., Chen, S. R., Lin, P. C., & Lai, H. R. (2020). Predicting exercise intention and behavior of Taiwanese children in a longitudinal sample. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 51, 50-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2019.08.008
Leitch, S. (2006). Prosperity for all in the global economy-world class skills: Final report. The Stationery Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/354161/Prosperity_for_all_in_the_global_economy_-_summary.pdf
Ling, M. K. (2016). The use of academic portfolio in the learning and assessment of physics students from a Singapore private college. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 3(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.245199
Liu, V. Y. T., Minaya, V., & Xu, D. (2022). The impact of dual enrollment on college application choice and admission success (CCRC Working Paper No. 129). Community College Research Center.
Lorenzo, G., & Ittelson, J. (2005). An overview of e-portfolios. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(1), 1-27.
Lu, Y. J., Lai, H. R., Lin, P. C., Kuo, S. Y., Chen, S. R., & Lee, P. H. (2022). Predicting exercise behaviors and intentions of Taiwanese urban high school students using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 62, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.07.001
Luchoomun, D., McLuckie, J., & Van, Wesel M. (2010). Collaborative e-learning: e-Portfolios for assessment, teaching and learning. Electron J e-Learning, 8(1), 21-30.
Mayhew, M. J., Hubbard, S. M., Finelli, C. J., Harding, T. S., & Carpenter, D. D. (2009). Using structural equation modeling to validate the theory of planned behavior as a model for predicting student cheating. The Review of Higher Education, 32(4), 441-468. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/rhe.0.0080
McMullan, M. (2006). Students’ perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43(3), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005
Nicholson, D. T. (2018). Enhancing student engagement through online portfolio assessment. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 11(1), 15-31.
Oudkerk P., A., Govaerts, M. J. B., Jaarsma, D. A. D. C., & Driessen, E. W. (2018). From aggregation to interpretation: How assessors judge complex data in a competency-based portfolio. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23, 275-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10459-017-9793-y
Pallais, A. (2015). Small differences that matter: Mistakes in applying to college. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(2), 493-520. https://doi.org/10.1086/678520
Paulson, F. L., Paulason, R. P., & Mayer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60-63.
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2003). Progress files for higher education: Guidelines for HE progress files. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8480/1/progfile2001.pdf
Quinn, R., & Ogburn, L. (2020). Ideas and the politics of school choice policy: Portfolio management in Philadelphia. Educational Policy, 34(1), 144-165. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0895904819881159
Samad, A. A., Kaur, C., & Singh, S. (2013). The use of portfolio as an assessment tool in the Malaysian L2 classroom. International Journal of English Language Education, 1(1), 94-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v1i1.2851
Samad, I., Jannah, M., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). EFL students’ strategies dealing with common difficulties in TOEFL reading comprehension section. IJoLE: International Journal of Language Education, 1(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.2869
Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
Shokraie, S. A. S., & Tabrizi, A. R. N. (2016). The effect of portfolio assessment on EFL learners’ L2 writing performance. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 321-331.
Shorrer, R. I. (2019). Simultaneous search: Beyond independent successes. In A. Karlin, N. Immorlica, & R. Johari (Eds.), The 2019 ACM conference on economics and computation (pp. 347-348). Association for Computing Machinery.
Stefani, L., Mason, R., & Pegler, C. (2007). The educational potential of e-portfolios: Supporting personal development and reflective learning. Routledge.
Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L. (2010). Predicting academic misconduct intentions and behavior using the theory of planned behavior and personality. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903539895
Tahriri, A., Sabet, M. K., & Aeineh, A. (2014). The effect of portfolio assessment on learning idioms in writing. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2(2), 53-57.
Tierney, R. J., Carter, M. A., & Desai, L. E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Christopher-Gordon.
Universities UK. (2007). Beyond the honours degree classification: Burgess Group final report. https://www.hear.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Burgess_final2007.pdf
Wang, L., & Wang, L. (2015). Using theory of planned behavior to predict the physical activity of children: Probing gender differences. BioMed Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/ 2015/536904

中文APA引文格式	簡瑋成（2024）。計畫行為理論高中生觀點分析學習歷程檔案實施與效益之研究。教育科學研究期刊，69（3），31-71。 https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0002
APA Format	Chien, W.-C. (2024). Investigating the Implementation and Benefits of the Academic Portfolio From the Perspective of High School Students by Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 69(3), 31-71. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0002

Journal directory listing - Volume 69 (2024) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【69(3)】September(Special Issue:Porfolio Assessment: Challenge and Innovations )

Top

Investigating the Implementation and Benefits of the Academic Portfolio From the Perspective of High School Students by Using the Theory of Planned Behavior Author: Wei-Cheng Chien ( Research Center for Educational System and Policy, National Academy for Educational Research; Department of Education and Learning Technology, National Tsing Hua University; Department of Graphics Arts and Communtions, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 69, No. 3
Date：September 2024
Pages：31-71
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202409_69(3).0002

Abstract：
Research motivation and purpose
The Academic Portfolio, a pivotal component of the Master Framework for the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education, is designed to promote literacy education and support high school students in career planning. Determining the effectiveness of the Academic Portfolio and understanding students’ perspectives and participation is necessary. A nationwide survey, in conjunction with empirical data, is required to validate the effectiveness of the Academic Portfolio and its influence on higher education choices. This study used the framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to examine high school students’ beliefs, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, intention, and behavior toward the Academic Portfolio and the influence of behavior on core competencies, career planning, and higher education choices.
Literature
The Academic Portfolio refers to a method of assessment that documents students’ learning processes, growth, and changes by collecting various processes and outputs, thereby authentically reflecting students’ learning performance. The Portfolio is accessible not only to students but also to peers, parents, and teachers, who can observe the students’ learning outcomes and related achievements. Additionally, observers can understand students’ strengths and weaknesses, intrinsic motivations, learning feedback, and self-actualization throughout the learning process. The 12-Year Basic Education program requires that students complete an Academic Portfolio in high school. The K-12 Education Administration of the Ministry of Education has established a student Academic Portfolio database for the senior secondary education stage that hosts relevant data uploaded by Taiwanese school students within a specified time frame. Subsequently, when students apply to universities, their files in the database, with their consent, can be provided to the applying schools as a reference for admissions. The greatest benefit of this system is that it allows universities to understand the students’ interests and aspirations without requiring high school seniors to create additional résumé files. The database contains information on students’ basic information, course records, course learning outcomes, diverse performances, student statements, and other materials (Lin, 2021; Ministry of Education, 2019; Shih et al., 2023). Following the implementation of the 108 Curriculum Guidelines, promoting the Academic Portfolio system has become a key policy initiative. Core competencies and practical learning activities within schools are imperative. However, the promotion of the Academic Portfolio system has encountered numerous misunderstandings and difficulties, not only from students and parents but also from school teachers and the general public (Lin, 2021; Liu, 2019). Therefore, this study examined the current implementation status of this initiative from the perspective of students by using a large-scale survey.
The TPB posits that the likelihood of an individual engaging in a particular action is primarily determined by the individual’s intention to perform that action, which is influenced by three main factors: attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1977). Within the TPB model, an individual’s engagement in a behavior is determined by their specific behavioral intention, which is influenced by their attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control (Wang et al., 2020; Chang et al., 2021). These factors can be traced back to behavioral beliefs, normative beliefs, and control beliefs, respectively. Behavioral beliefs refer to an individual’s favorable thoughts about the outcomes of completing a specific behavior. Normative beliefs involve the perceived behavioral expectations of significant others, such as relatives, friends, and teachers. Control beliefs refer to an individual’s perception of the resources and opportunities available to them or the barriers they may encounter when undertaking a specific behavior (Ajzen, 1991; Davis et al., 2002). Intention, in this context, represents the strength of an individual’s willingness to perform a specific behavior. Attitude refers to an individual’s positive or negative feelings toward the behavior. Subjective norms refers to the perceived social pressure to perform or not perform the behavior. Perceived behavioral control refers to an individual’s perception of the extent to which they can autonomously control the behavior (Ajzen, 1991; Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975). The definitions of all these TPB-related variables in the context of this study are as follows:
1. Behavioral beliefs: High school students’ beliefs that engaging in the preparation of the Academic Portfolio will lead to favorable outcomes, categorized into affective and instrumental beliefs.
2. Normative beliefs: Evaluations of the Academic Portfolio by high school students’ teachers, peers, relatives, and societal norms.
3. Control beliefs: High school students’ perceptions of the time, resources, and opportunities they have for preparing the Academic Portfolio.
4. Attitude: High school students’ positive or negative evaluations of the Academic Portfolio.
5. Subjective norms: The social pressure high school students perceive in relation to the Academic Portfolio, meaning the influence of significant others (teachers, peers, relatives, societal norms) on students’ attitudes and behaviors regarding the Portfolio.
6. Perceived behavioral control: High school students’ perception of their autonomy and confidence in preparing the Academic Portfolio.
7. Behavioral intention: The subjective probability that high school students will engage in preparing the Academic Portfolio, reflecting their willingness to do so.
8. Behavior: The degree to which high school students are actually involved in the preparation of the Academic Portfolio.
Methods
This study primarily analyzed feedback from high school students about the Academic Portfolio system. Data were collected through a paper-based questionnaire survey from second- and third-year high school students in Taiwan. A total of 120 high schools of various types were randomly selected, and 40 students were randomly chosen from each school, resulting in a total of 4,800 questionnaires being distributed, from which 3,638 valid responses were collected.
Results and conclusion
1. High school students still lack sufficient belief in the benefits of the Academic Portfolio.
2. Educational stakeholders express slight disagreement with the Academic Portfolio.
3. High school students generally have adequate resources and opportunities to prepare their Academic Portfolio.
4. High school students hold a somewhat negative attitude towards the Academic Portfolio.
5. Educational stakeholders believe that high school students should make efforts to enrich their Academic Portfolios.
6. High school students are still able to autonomously manage the preparation of their Academic Portfolios.
7. High school students exhibit a willingness to prepare their Academic Portfolios and engage in actual preparatory behavior.
8. Perceived behavioral control is the most crucial factor influencing high school students’ willingness and behavior towards preparing their Academic Portfolio.
9. Participation in the preparation of the Academic Portfolio is beneficial for cultivating core competencies and career planning among high school students.
10. High school students’ engagement in preparing their Academic Portfolio slightly increases their intention to pursue higher education and exerts a minor influence on their choice of admission pathways.

Keywords：career planning, theory of planned behavior, core competency, high school students, academic portfolio

本網站獲「科技部人文社會科學研究中心」補助

地址：臺北市大安區和平東路一段162號國立臺灣師範大學圖書館出版中心

電話：(02)7749-5279

CONTRIBUTORSNOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 69卷(2024) - 【教育科學研究期刊】69(3)九月刊(學習歷程檔案評量：挑戰與創新) 回上一頁

計畫行為理論高中生觀點分析學習歷程檔案實施與效益之研究 作者:國家教育研究院教育制度及政策研究中心、國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系、國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系簡瑋成

Journal directory listing - Volume 69 (2024) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【69(3)】September(Special Issue:Porfolio Assessment: Challenge and Innovations ) Top

CONTRIBUTORS
NOTICE

期刊目錄列表 - 69卷(2024) - 【教育科學研究期刊】69(3)九月刊(學習歷程檔案評量：挑戰與創新)

回上一頁

計畫行為理論高中生觀點分析學習歷程檔案實施與效益之研究作者:國家教育研究院教育制度及政策研究中心、國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系、國立臺灣師範大學圖文傳播學系簡瑋成

Journal directory listing - Volume 69 (2024) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【69(3)】September(Special Issue:Porfolio Assessment: Challenge and Innovations )

Top