大學生自身技術之研究：研究工具編製與類型建構
作者:郭丁熒(國立臺南大學教育學系)
卷期：60卷第3期
日期：2015年9月
頁碼：27-62
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02
摘要：
本研究旨在探討自身技術之意涵、發展評量大學生自身技術之工具，並建構大學生自身技術類型。透過文獻探討、半結構訪談，擬訂大學生自身技術量表，經專家審查，並以452位大學生為預試樣本進行試探性因素分析，再以1,361位大學生為正式樣本，進行驗證性因素分析。研究結論有：一、本研究量表之效度、信度頗佳，二階因素分析顯示模式尚稱適配；二、大學生自身技術包含鍛鍊、告解坦白、問題化、自我檢查、對話辯證、說真話、越界體驗、節制、觀察等九類。與Foucault所提之自身技術相較，臺灣大學生自身技術新增觀察一類，而無傾聽一類，可能與網路世代及文化差異有關。
關鍵詞：大學生、自身、自身技術
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 何乏筆（2003a）。從性史到修養史：論傅柯《性史》第二卷中的四元架構。載於黃瑞琪（主編），後學新論（pp. 75-106）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Heubel, Fabian (2003a). From the history of sexuality to the history of self-cultivation: The theoretical structure of Foucault’s history of sexuality II. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 75-106). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
- 何乏筆（2003b）。自我發現與自我創造：關於哈道特和傅柯修養論之差異。載於黃瑞琪（主編），後學新論（pp. 47-73）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Heubel, Fabian (2003b). Self-discovery and self-creation: On the difference between Hadot’s and Foucault’s concept of self-cultivation. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 47-73). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
- 吳秀瑾（2002）。傅科和布爾迪厄身體觀之比較。取自http://www.csat.org.tw/csa/year2002/papers %5CFoucault4_2.doc【Wu, S.-C. (2002). Corporeal perspective between Foucault and Bourdieu. Retrieved from http://www.csat.org.tw/ csa/year2002/papers%5CFoucault4_2.doc】
- 林生傳（2003）。教育研究法。臺北市：心理。【Lin, S.-C. (2003). Education research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- 邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用。臺北市：雙葉書廊。【Chiou, H.-J. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling with LISEL/SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
» 展開更多
- 何乏筆（2003a）。從性史到修養史：論傅柯《性史》第二卷中的四元架構。載於黃瑞琪（主編），後學新論（pp. 75-106）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Heubel, Fabian (2003a). From the history of sexuality to the history of self-cultivation: The theoretical structure of Foucault’s history of sexuality II. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 75-106). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
- 何乏筆（2003b）。自我發現與自我創造：關於哈道特和傅柯修養論之差異。載於黃瑞琪（主編），後學新論（pp. 47-73）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Heubel, Fabian (2003b). Self-discovery and self-creation: On the difference between Hadot’s and Foucault’s concept of self-cultivation. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 47-73). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
- 吳秀瑾（2002）。傅科和布爾迪厄身體觀之比較。取自http://www.csat.org.tw/csa/year2002/papers %5CFoucault4_2.doc【Wu, S.-C. (2002). Corporeal perspective between Foucault and Bourdieu. Retrieved from http://www.csat.org.tw/ csa/year2002/papers%5CFoucault4_2.doc】
- 林生傳（2003）。教育研究法。臺北市：心理。【Lin, S.-C. (2003). Education research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- 邱皓政（2011）。結構方程模式：LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用。臺北市：雙葉書廊。【Chiou, H.-J. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling with LISEL/SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
- 姚人多（2005）。說真話的問題化－《傅柯說真話》導讀。載於鄭義愷（譯），傅柯說真話（pp. 9-43）。臺北市：群學。【Yao, J.-T. (2005). The problematization of parrhesia: Reviewing “Fearless Speech”. In I.-K. Jeng (Trans.), Fearless speech (pp. 9-43). Taipei, Taiwan: Socio.】
- 高宣揚（2004）。傅柯的生存美學：西方思想的起點與終點。臺北市：五南。【Kao, S.-Y. (2004). L’Esthetique de l’existence chez Foucault. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 郭丁熒（2012）。增進大學生品格的教學模式之建構～以「關懷自身」為核心。課程與教學季刊，15（2），21-44。【Guo, D.-Y. (2012). The construction of caring-for-self instruction model for promoting undergraduates’ characters. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 15(2), 21-44.】
- 郭丁熒（2013）。大學學系教育目標之分析及其對課程與教學的啟示。課程與教學季刊，16（2），1-32。【Guo, D.-Y. (2013). The educational goals of university－Departments and their implications in curriculum and instruction. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 16(2), 1-32.】
- 郭丁熒（2014）。大學生關懷自身之探討：3W的分析。教育心理學報，46（1），1-26。doi:10. 6251/BEP.20131113【Guo, D.-Y. (2014). The care-for-self of undergraduates: An analysis via 3W. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 1-26. doi:10.6251/BEP.20131113】
- 教育部（2013）。教育部人才培育白皮書。取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20131209094223/ %E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E4%BA%BA%E6%89%8D%E5%9F%B9%E8%82%B2%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B81.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2013). White paper on human resource development by the Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20131209094223/%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8% E4%BA%BA%E6%89%8D%E5%9F%B9%E8%82%B2%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B81.pdf】
- 教育部（2014）。103學年度大學網路博覽會。取自http://univ.edu.tw/AreaView.asp【Ministry of Education. (2014). University networking exposition, 2014. Retrieved from http://univ.edu.tw/Area View.asp】
- 黃芳銘（2004）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市：五南。【Huwang, F.-M. (2004). Structural equation modeling: Theory and practice. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 黃瑞祺（2003）。自我修養與自我創新：晚年傅柯的主體／自我觀。載於黃瑞祺（主編），後學新論（pp. 11-45）。臺北市：左岸文化。【Hwang, R. R.-C. (2003). Self-cultivation as self-innovation: The concept of subject and self in late Foucault. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 11-45). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
- 黃騰（2005）。從「角色」到「自我」－論教師改變的歷史困境與可能。教育研究集刊，51（4），89-116。【Huang, T. (2005). From “role” to “self”: An investigation of the problems and possibilities of teacher change. Bulletin of Educational Research, 51(4), 89-116.】
- 歐用生（1991）。內容分析法。載於黃光雄、簡茂發（主編），教育研究法（pp. 229-254）。臺北市：師大書苑。【Ou, Y.-S. (1991). Content analysis. In K.-H. Huang & M.-F. Chien (Eds.), Education research (pp. 229-254). Taipei, Taiwan: Lucky Book Store.】
- 蘇永明（2006）。主體的爭議與教育－以現代和後現代哲學為範圍。臺北市：心理。【Shu, Y.-M. (2006). The controversy and education of subject: Based on modern and post-modern philosophy. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
- Foucault, M.（2005）。傅柯說真話（鄭義愷，譯）。臺北市：群學。（原著出版於2001年）【Foucault, M. (2005). Fearless speech (I.-K. Jeng, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Socio. (Original work published 2001)】
- Lewis, H. R.（2007）。失去靈魂的優秀：哈佛如何忘卻其教育宗旨？（侯定凱，譯）。臺北市：張老師文化。（原著出版於2006年）【Lewis, H. R. (2007). Excellent without a soul: How a great university forgot education (D.-K. Hou, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Living Psychology. (Original work published 2006)】
- Merquior, J. G.（1998）。傅柯（陳瑞麟，譯）。臺北市：桂冠。（原著出版於1985年）【Merquior, J. G. (1998). Foucault (R.-L. Chen, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate. (Original work published 1985)】
- Miller, J. E.（1999）。傅柯的生死愛慾（高毅，譯）。臺北市：時報。（原著出版於1993年）【Miller, J. E. (1999). The passion of Michel Foucault (Y. Kao, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: China Times. (Original work published 1993)】
- Pattonmm, M. Q.（1995）。質的評鑑與研究（吳芝儀、李奉儒，譯）。臺北市：桂冠。（原著出版於1990年）【Pattonmm, M. Q. (1995). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (C.-Y. Wu & F.-J. Lee, Trans.). Taipei, Taiwan: Laureate. (Original work published 1990)】
- Ambrosio, J. (2008). Writing the self: Ethical self-formation and the undefined work of freedom. Educational Theory, 58(3), 251-267. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00287.x
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi:10.1177/009207038801600107
- Besley, A. C. (Tina). (2005). Self-denial or self-mastery? Foucault’s genealogy of the confessional self. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 33(3), 365-382. doi:10.1080/03069880500 179582
- Birnbaum, M. G. (2008). Taking Goffman on a tour of Facebook: College students and the presentation of self in a mediated digital environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona, Tucson, AR.
- Bisson, S. (2002). Learning styles: Allowing children to “unmold”. Teach, Jan/Feb, 9-11.
- Britton, C., & Baxter, A. (1999). Becoming a mature student: Gendered narratives of the self. Gender and Education, 11(2), 179-193. doi:10.1080/09540259920681
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
- Cahill, H. (2012). Form and governance: Considering the drama as a “technology of the self”. Research in Drama Education, 17(3), 405-424. doi:10.1080/13569783.2012.701444
- Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(5), 754-761. doi:10.1037/0022- 006X.56.5.754
- Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Foucault, M. (1983). Afterword by Michel Foucault: The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed., pp. 208- 226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Foucault, M. (1985). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality volume two (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Pantheon Books. (Original work published 1984)
- Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16-49). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.
- Foucault, M. (1997a). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (P. Rabinow Ed.; R. Hurley and others, Trans.). New York, NY: The New Press. (Original work published 1994)
- Foucault, M. (1997b). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), P. Rainbow (Series Ed.), R. Hurley et al. (Trans.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity and truth, the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 1, pp. 281-301). London, UK: Penguin Press.
- Foucault, M. (1998). What is an author? In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), P. Rainbow (Series Ed.), R. Hurley et al. (Trans.), Aesthetics, method, and epistemology: Essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984 (Vol. 2, pp. 205-222). New York, NY: The New Press.
- Foucault, M. (2006). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the College de France, 1981-1982 (F. Gros, Ed.; G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Picador. (Original work published 2001)
- Hodges, B. (2004). Medical student bodies and the pedagogy of self-reflection, self-assessment, and self-regulation. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 20(2), 41-52.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10. 1080/10705519909540118
- Infinito, J. (2003). Jane Elliot meets Foucault: The formation of ethical identities in the classroom. Journal of Moral Education, 32(1), 67-76. doi:10.1080/0305724022000073347
- Marshall, J. D. (2008). ‘Developing’ the self in the knowledge economy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(2-3), 149-159. doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9086-7
- McPherson, P., & Shulenburger, D. (2010). Expanding undergraduate education to meet national goals: The role of research universities. Change, 42(1), 51-56. doi:10.1080/00091380903449136
- Meyer, K. A. (2003). The Web’s impact on student learning. THE Journal, 30(10), 14-24.
- Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Project update–May 2012. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/48088270.pdf
- Peters, M. A. (2003). Truth-telling as an educational practice of the self: Foucault, Parrhesia and the ethics of subjectivity. Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 207-224. doi:10.1080/030549803 2000080684
- Peters, M. A. (2005). Foucault, counselling and the aesthetics of existence. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33(3), 383-396. doi:10.1080/03069880500179616
- Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111. doi:10.2307/3586356
- Slifkin, J. M. (2001). Writing the care of the self: Variances in higher order thinking and narrative topics in high school students’ reflective journals. English Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 5-9.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(3)】September
Undergraduates’ Technologies of the Self: Inventory and Taxonomy
Author: Ding-Ying Guo(Department of Education, National University of Tainan)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 60, No. 3
Date：September 2015
Pages：27-62
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02
Abstract：
This study explores the meaning of “technologies of the self” and develops an inventory to identify and measure undergraduates’ technologies of the self. The inventory was proposed according to a literature review, semistructured interviews, expert review, exploratory factor analysis involving 452 undergraduates, and confirmatory factor analysis involving 1,361 undergraduates. The conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) The validity and reliability of the inventory developed are favorable, and the fitness of the model is acceptable according to second-order confirmatory factor analysis. (2) Nine categories of undergraduates’ technologies of the self are Exercise, Confession, Problematization, Self-examination, Dialog, Parrhesia, Transgressive experience, Moderation, and Observation. Unlike the technologies of the self proposed by Foucault, Taiwanese undergraduates reveal a new category of observation and do not exhibit the category of Listening. These discrepancies may result from cultural differences between Taiwan and Europe as well as computer networks in the Net Generation.
Keywords：undergraduate, self, technologies of the self