（專題）全球視野在地化的校務研究：以國立臺灣大學經驗為例
作者:李紋霞(國立臺灣大學教學發展中心)、符碧真(國立臺灣大學師資培育中心)
卷期：62卷第4期
日期：2017年12月
頁碼：1-25
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).01
摘要：
過去我國的大學經營常是「跟著感覺走」，但在校園民主化後，校務決策應以「證據」為本。2015年在教育部推動下，許多大學成立校務研究（Institutional Research, IR）辦公室進行相關工作。美國校務研究發展出成熟的運作模式，成為全球高等教育的典範，惟校務研究需高度與所處的區域、校園環境脈絡結合，故如何具有全球視野在地化的思維，從事植基於校園文化的IR工作，以解決自己的問題，是當前要務。本文以廣為學界引用的校務研究三種組織智能與五種角色功能面貌，檢視與反思國立臺灣大學過去10年發展全球視野在地化IR工作的過程和挑戰，供各校未來推動IR工作的參考。
關鍵詞：校務研究、校務研究角色功能面貌、校務研究組織智能、國立臺灣大學、證據為本
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 何希慧（2015）。大學建立校務研究體制之建議：以學習成效評估及提升機制為例。評鑑雙月刊，57，38-41。【Ho, S.-H. (2015). Suggestions on establishing institutional research system in universities: Learning outcomes assessment and improvement mechanism. Evaluation Bimonthly, 57, 38-41.】
- 呂良正（2014）。臺大土木系Capstone課程經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊，49，21-24。【Leu, L.-J. (2014). Experiences of capstone course at NTU’s Civil Engineering Department. Evaluation Bimonthly, 49, 21-24.】
- 國立臺灣大學校務研究辦公室（2016）。104學年度大學院校提升校務專業管理能力計畫期中成果報告。未出版。【Office of Institutional Research, National Taiwan University. (2016). Report of enhancing the capabilities of Institutional Management 2015. Unpublished.】
- 國立臺灣大學校務研究辦公室（2017）。國立臺灣大學校務研究中程工作計畫規劃（內部會議文件）。未出版。【Office of Institutional Research, National Taiwan University. (2017). Mid-term plan of institutional research at the National Taiwan University (Internal OIR meeting document). Unpublished.】
- 國立臺灣大學邁向頂尖計畫（2013）。臺灣大學「邁向頂尖大學計畫」102年自評報告。取自http://top100.ntu.edu.tw/outcomes/-102.pdf 【National Taiwan University Aiming for the Top University Plan. (2013). 2013 National Taiwan University self-evaluation report of aiming for the top university plan. Retrieved from http://top100.ntu.edu.tw/outcomes/ -102.pdf】
» 展開更多
- 何希慧（2015）。大學建立校務研究體制之建議：以學習成效評估及提升機制為例。評鑑雙月刊，57，38-41。【Ho, S.-H. (2015). Suggestions on establishing institutional research system in universities: Learning outcomes assessment and improvement mechanism. Evaluation Bimonthly, 57, 38-41.】
- 呂良正（2014）。臺大土木系Capstone課程經驗分享。評鑑雙月刊，49，21-24。【Leu, L.-J. (2014). Experiences of capstone course at NTU’s Civil Engineering Department. Evaluation Bimonthly, 49, 21-24.】
- 國立臺灣大學校務研究辦公室（2016）。104學年度大學院校提升校務專業管理能力計畫期中成果報告。未出版。【Office of Institutional Research, National Taiwan University. (2016). Report of enhancing the capabilities of Institutional Management 2015. Unpublished.】
- 國立臺灣大學校務研究辦公室（2017）。國立臺灣大學校務研究中程工作計畫規劃（內部會議文件）。未出版。【Office of Institutional Research, National Taiwan University. (2017). Mid-term plan of institutional research at the National Taiwan University (Internal OIR meeting document). Unpublished.】
- 國立臺灣大學邁向頂尖計畫（2013）。臺灣大學「邁向頂尖大學計畫」102年自評報告。取自http://top100.ntu.edu.tw/outcomes/-102.pdf 【National Taiwan University Aiming for the Top University Plan. (2013). 2013 National Taiwan University self-evaluation report of aiming for the top university plan. Retrieved from http://top100.ntu.edu.tw/outcomes/ -102.pdf】
- 常桐善（2014）。美國校務研究的核心內容。高教技職簡訊，95，21-24。【Chang, T.-S. (2014). The core content of American institutional research. Higher Education, Technological & Vocational Education Newsletter, 95, 21-24.】
- 符碧真（2017）。大學學習成果總檢驗：合頂石－總結性課程。教育研究集刊，63（1），31-67。【Fwu, B.-J. (2017). A total inspection of college student learning outcomes: Capstone courses as summative courses. Bulletin of Educational Research, 63(1), 31-67.】
- 陳俞澄、李紋霞（2015）。台大土木工程學系課程精進改革經驗。杜風，92。取自http://www. ntuce-newsletter.tw/vol.92/T4_14.html 【Chen, Y.-C., & Lee, J. W.-S. (2015). Curriculum reform in NTU’s Civil Engineering Department. Newsletter, 92. Retrieved from http://www.ntuce-newsletter.tw/vol.92/T4_14.html】
- 傅遠智（2016）。校務研究與大學校務評鑑。評鑑雙月刊，60，18-21。【Fu, Y.-C. (2016). Institutional research and university institutional evaluation. Evaluation Bimonthly, 60, 18-21.】
- 彭森明（2010）。大學校院如何推展學生學習成果評量。評鑑雙月刊，24，28-34。【Peng, S. (2010). How to promote student learning-outcome assessment in colleges and universities. Evaluation Bimonthly, 24, 28-34.】
- 彭森明（2014，10月）。大學校務研究：理念與實踐。簡報發表於教育部103年度校務研究辦公室建置與運作實務研討會，新竹市。【Peng, S. (2014, October). University intuitional research: Idea and practice. PPTs presented at the 2014 Seminar on Establishment and Operation of Institutional Research Office Sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Hsinchu, Taiwan.】
- 劉孟奇（2016）。以校務研究為校務決策之本。評鑑雙月刊，60，10-12。【Liu, M.-C. (2016). School policy-making based on institutional research. Evaluation Bimonthly, 60, 10-12.】
- 劉維琪（2009）。迎接以SLO為中心的評鑑新時代。評鑑雙月刊，20，6-7。【Liu, V.-W. (2009). Toward the new age of SLO-centered evaluation. Evaluation Bimonthly, 20, 6-7.】
- 蔡景婷（2016）。臺灣第一個校務研究專業組織成立：黃榮村榮膺首任理事長。評鑑雙月刊，60，8-9。【Tsai, C.-T. (2016). The first professional association for institutional research in Taiwan: Jong-Tsun Huang is be honored with the first president. Evaluation Bimonthly, 60, 8-9.】
- 鄭語謙（2016a，8月21日）。誰是台大學生？學者研究台北市大安區最多。聯合報。取自https://video.udn.com/news/546349 【Zheng, Y.-Q. (2016a, August 21). Who are NTU students? Dá an district, Taipei city has the highest number. United Daily News. Retrieved from https://video.udn.com/news/546349】
- 鄭語謙（2016b，8月19日）。台大碩士找不到工作？楊泮池：應是個案。聯合報。取自http://udn.com/news/story/6928/1906045 【Zheng, Y.-Q. (2016b, August 19). NTU master alumni can’t find a job? Yang, Pan-Chyr: It’s a special case. United Daily News. Retrieved from http://udn.com/news/story/6928/1906045】
- 駱明慶（2016）。誰是台大學生？（2001-2014）－多元入學的影響。取自http://www.econ.ntu. edu.tw/ter/new/data/new/forthcoming/104-014.pdf 【Luoh, M.-C. (2016). Who are NTU students? (2001-2014)—The effects of multi-channel admission program. Retrieved from http://www.econ.ntu.edu.tw/ter/new/data/new/forthcoming/104-014.pdf】
- Black, K. E., & Hundley, S. P. (2004). Capping off the curriculum. Assessment Update, 16(1), 3.
- Chirikov, I. (2013). Research universities as knowledge networks: The role of institutional research. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 456-469. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.773778
- Eimers, M. T., Ko, J. W., & Gardner, D. (2012). Practicing institutional research. In R. D. Howard, G. W. McLaughlin, W. E. Knight, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of institutional research (pp. 40-56). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Foraker, M. (2014). Institutional research: Serving university deans and department heads. Retrieved from https://www.wku.edu/instres/documents/foraker_ir_serving_deans_dept_heads_ 2014.pdf
- Glover, R. (2009). Strengthening institutional research and information technology capacity through achieving the dream: Principles and practices of student success. Retrieved from http://www. achievingthedream.org/sites/default/files/resources/ PrinciplesAndPracticesofStudentSuccess_StrengtheningInstitutional ResearchAndInformationTechnologyCapacityThroughATD.pdf
- Hau, K.-T., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Chinese students’ motivation and achievement. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 187-204). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Hauhart, R. C., & Grahe, J. E. (2015). Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Holdsworth, A., Watty, K., & Davies, M. (2009). Developing capstone experiences. Retrieved from http://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/1761203/Capstone_Guide_09.pdf
- Knight, W. E., & Leimer, C. (2009). Will IR staff stick? An exploration of institutional researchers’ intentions to remain in or leave their jobs. Research in Higher Education, 51(2), 109-131. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9152-9
- Lange, L., Saavedra, F. M., & Romano, J. (2013). Institutional research in emerging countries of Southern Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East and North Africa: Global frameworks and local practices. New Directions for Institutional Research, 157, 23-35. doi:10.1002/ir.20037
- Leimer, C. (2011, April). Wave of the future?: Integrating IR, outcomes assessment, planning, program review, and accreditation. Paper presented at the Western Association of School and Colleges Academic Resource Conference, San Francisco, CA.
- Posey, J. T., & Pitter, G. W. (2012). Integrating the functions of institutional research, institutional effectiveness, and information management. AIR Professional File, 126. Retrieved from https://www.airweb.org/EducationAndEvents/Publications/Documents/126.pdf
- Santos, J. L. (2006). Institutional research (IR) meets knowledge management (KM). In A. S. Metcalfe (Ed.), Knowledge management and higher education: A critical analysis (pp. 93-114). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
- Saupe, J. L. (1990). The functions of institutional research (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://admin. airweb.org/AboutUs/History/Documents/Papers-Books-Manuscripts/Functions-of-IR-Saupe-1edition.pdf
- Saupe, J. L., & Montgomery, J. R. (1970). The nature and role of institutional research: A memo to a college or university. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED049672)
- Serban, A. M. (2002). Knowledge management: The fifth face of institutional research. In A. M. Serban & J. Luan (Eds.), Knowledge management: Building a competitive advantage in higher education (pp. 105-112). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Sheehan, B. (1975). The question of synthesis in higher education management. In P. J. Plourde & C. R. Thomas (Eds.), Innovative systems: Solution or illusion? (pp. 135-155). Boulder, CO: College and University Systems Exchange.
- Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 1-10. doi:10.1007/BF00991859
- Terenzini, P. T. (2013). “On the nature of institutional research” revisited: Plus ça change…? Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 137-148. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9274-3
- The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. Retrieved from http://webcms.colostate.edu/reinventioncenter/media/sites/74/2015/08/Boyer CommissionReport.pdf
- Volkwein, J. F. (1999). The four faces of institutional research. In J. F. Volkwein (Ed.), What is institutional research all about? A critical and comprehensive assessment of the profession (pp. 9-19). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Volkwein, J. F. (2008). The foundations and evolution of institutional research. In D. G. Terkla (Ed.), Institutional research: More than just data (pp. 5-20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Volkwein, J. F., Liu, Y., & Woodell, J. (2012). The structure and functions of institutional research offices. In R. D. Howard, G. W. McLaughlin, W. E. Knight, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of institutional research (pp. 22-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Webber, K. (2012). The role of institutional research in a high profile study of undergraduate research. Research of Higher Education, 53(7), 695-716. doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9257-4
- Webber, K., & Calderon, A. (2015). Institutional research and planning in higher education: Global contexts and themes. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Webber, K., Calderon, A., Nauffal, D., Saavedra, M., Bramblett, S., & Borden, V. (2015, May). IR in the world around us. Paper presented at the Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Denver, CO.
Journal directory listing - Volume 62 (2017) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【62(4)】December (Special Issue: Institutional Research and Higher Education Development)
(Special Issue) Think Globally and Act Locally: National Taiwan University’s Experience of Institutional Research
Author: Jennifer Wen-Shya Lee(Center for Teaching and Learning Development, National Taiwan University), Bih-Jen Fwu(Center for Teacher Education, National Taiwan University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 62, No.4
Date：December 2017
Pages：1-25
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).01
Abstract：
Previously, university management in Taiwan was often guided by common sense or decision-makers’ intuition. However, because university governing bodies have become more democratic, policymaking need to be more evidence based. In 2015, with the promotion of the Ministry of Education, many universities established institutional research (IR) offices to support evidence-based policymaking. The mature U.S. IR model has long been considered a global standard. However, because each university has its own campus culture and governance style, the U.S. model must be adapted and modified to suit Taiwanese universities. The major objective of IR is to think globally and act locally by maintaining a global perspective, staying informed of local concerns, and working within regional constraints. By using the well-cited frameworks of three organizational intelligences and five IR faces, this paper examined and reflected on the processes and challenges of IR at National Taiwan University (NTU). NTU’s experience may provide insights into future IR development in Taiwanese higher education.
Keywords：evidence-based, faces of institutional research, institutional research, National Taiwan University, organizational intelligence